Plan to change Confederate park names causes uproar

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (AP) - The statue of Confederate fighter Nathan Bedford Forrest astride a horse towers above the Memphis park bearing his name. It's a larger-than-life tribute to the warrior still admired by many for fiercely defending the South in the Civil War - and scorned by others for a slave-trading past and ties to the Ku Klux Klan.
Though the bloodiest war on American soil was fought 150 years ago, racially tinged discord flared before its City Council voted this week to strip Forrest's name from the downtown park and call it Health Sciences Park. It also voted to rename Confederate Park as Memphis Park and Jefferson Davis Park as Mississippi River Park.
A committee has been formed to help the council decide on permanent names for the parks.
The changes have drawn praise from those who said bygone reminders of the Confederacy had to be swept away in what today is a racially diverse city. Critics cried foul, saying moves to blot out such associations were tantamount to rewriting the history of a Mississippi River city steeped in Old South heritage.
The struggle over Forrest's legacy and moves to rename other parks highlights a broader national debate over what Confederate figures represent in the 21st century as a far more diverse nation takes new stock of the war on its 150th anniversary with the hindsight of the civil rights era.
Although the Forrest name change had been expected, a simultaneous move by the City Council to rename Confederate Park and Jefferson Davis Park was not. It arose quickly after council members learned of pending state legislation aimed at preventing the renaming any parks honoring wars or historical military figures.
Kennith Van Buren, a local African-American civil rights activist, said stripping away park names tied to the Confederacy or its leading figures were overdue.
"It's very offensive," he said. "How can we have unity in the nation when we have one city, right here in Memphis, which fails to be unified?"
Most of the emotion over the council's action has centered on Forrest. His defenders, mostly white, cite Forrest's accomplishments as an alderman, businessman and military leader. Critics, black and white, say honoring Forrest glorifies a slave trader and Ku Klux Klan member.
Katherine Blaylock, a Memphis resident who opposes the name changes, defended Forrest and accused the council of trying to rewrite history.
"Memphis has always been a racially divided city," Blaylock, 43, said after Tuesday's meeting. "It's been a big clash since way back when. We do what we can to come together and be a community, but the antagonists that keep bringing it out on both sides are the bad apples."
Forrest lived in Memphis before the Civil War, working as a cotton farmer and slave trader. Though lacking traditional military training, he rose to lieutenant general in the Confederate Army. He became legendary for fast horseback raids that disrupted the enemy's supply lines and communications.
Forrest also led the siege against Union-held Fort Pillow in 1864. With the clear advantage, Forrest ordered Union Maj. William Bradford and his troops to surrender. Forrest's men then stormed the fort and killed about 300 soldiers, half of them black. They also took black and white prisoners.
Questions linger whether the Union soldiers at Fort Pillow were killed as they tried to surrender. Northern newspaper reports referred to the battle as an atrocity, but some historians say the deaths were a consequence of battle.
Forrest later became a member of the Klan, which intimidated and threatened Southern blacks. His level of involvement in the Klan is a source of argument, and he is believed to have helped disband the first incarnation of the Klan in 1869.
Supporters praise him for offering to free 45 of his own slaves if they would serve in the Confederacy. They also claim Forrest was reluctant to divide families when he bought slaves.
Forrest died in 1877 and his body was moved to Forrest Park in the early 1900s. The tree-lined park about as large as a city block is just miles from the old Lorraine Hotel, the site of Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination in 1968.
King's murder is a cloud that lingers over Memphis long after the civil rights leader was slain. Race remains an undercurrent in many aspects of daily life. Not until last year did the city name its first street for King.
This is not the first time Forrest Park has sparked acrid debate. Memphis officials, led by the city's black mayor, rejected an effort to rename it in 2005. Other cities in the U.S. have also wrestled with the issue of naming parks and buildings after Forrest.
In 2008, a majority white school board in Jacksonville, Fla., rejected an attempt to rename Nathan Bedford Forrest High School.
Last September, the City Council in Selma, Ala. voted to stop work on a monument honoring Forrest at a city cemetery after someone removed Forrest's bust from the site. The apparent theft had led to protests by civil rights advocates not to replace it.
And, in December, Dixie State College in Utah removed a bronze statue of Confederate soldiers from campus.
Tennessee also has a state park named for Forrest and a modern-day statue of him in Nashville erected on private land.
The most recent move to rename the Memphis park began in January.
Councilman Myron Lowery proposed renaming Forrest Park after Ida B. Wells, a black journalist who exposed the horrors of lynching and fought for civil rights for African-Americans and women.
At a park committee meeting last month, Councilwoman Janis Fullilove left in tears after another council member, Bill Boyd, defended Forrest as a benefactor and promoter of black people after the Civil War.
Fullilove, who is black, denounced Boyd's comments as lies. Boyd, who is white, has proposed keeping Forrest's name on the park and renaming a separate city park after Wells.
Historians at Tuesday's meeting of the park commission meeting highlighted the ambiguity of Forrest's legacy.
Rhodes College historian Charles McKinney said Forrest represents subjugation and division. But historian and Sons of Confederate Veterans member Lee Millar said slave trading was a part of doing business in the South in Forrest's day.
"Forrest was known as a very humane slave trader," said Millar, who is white. "He never split families. He allowed his slaves for sale to seek their own master."
A committee including historians, council members and an NAACP representative will discuss what to permanently name the parks. Some black and white council members hope the process helps bring people together.
Others say the city needs to discuss more pressing matters such as crime and education.
"I don't care if it's named for Nathan Bedford Forrest," said Councilman Harold Collins, who is black. "He's a dead man."
Though the bloodiest war on American soil was fought 150 years ago, racially tinged discord flared before its City Council voted this week to strip Forrest's name from the downtown park and call it Health Sciences Park. It also voted to rename Confederate Park as Memphis Park and Jefferson Davis Park as Mississippi River Park.
A committee has been formed to help the council decide on permanent names for the parks.
The changes have drawn praise from those who said bygone reminders of the Confederacy had to be swept away in what today is a racially diverse city. Critics cried foul, saying moves to blot out such associations were tantamount to rewriting the history of a Mississippi River city steeped in Old South heritage.
The struggle over Forrest's legacy and moves to rename other parks highlights a broader national debate over what Confederate figures represent in the 21st century as a far more diverse nation takes new stock of the war on its 150th anniversary with the hindsight of the civil rights era.
Although the Forrest name change had been expected, a simultaneous move by the City Council to rename Confederate Park and Jefferson Davis Park was not. It arose quickly after council members learned of pending state legislation aimed at preventing the renaming any parks honoring wars or historical military figures.
Kennith Van Buren, a local African-American civil rights activist, said stripping away park names tied to the Confederacy or its leading figures were overdue.
"It's very offensive," he said. "How can we have unity in the nation when we have one city, right here in Memphis, which fails to be unified?"
Most of the emotion over the council's action has centered on Forrest. His defenders, mostly white, cite Forrest's accomplishments as an alderman, businessman and military leader. Critics, black and white, say honoring Forrest glorifies a slave trader and Ku Klux Klan member.
Katherine Blaylock, a Memphis resident who opposes the name changes, defended Forrest and accused the council of trying to rewrite history.
"Memphis has always been a racially divided city," Blaylock, 43, said after Tuesday's meeting. "It's been a big clash since way back when. We do what we can to come together and be a community, but the antagonists that keep bringing it out on both sides are the bad apples."
Forrest lived in Memphis before the Civil War, working as a cotton farmer and slave trader. Though lacking traditional military training, he rose to lieutenant general in the Confederate Army. He became legendary for fast horseback raids that disrupted the enemy's supply lines and communications.
Forrest also led the siege against Union-held Fort Pillow in 1864. With the clear advantage, Forrest ordered Union Maj. William Bradford and his troops to surrender. Forrest's men then stormed the fort and killed about 300 soldiers, half of them black. They also took black and white prisoners.
Questions linger whether the Union soldiers at Fort Pillow were killed as they tried to surrender. Northern newspaper reports referred to the battle as an atrocity, but some historians say the deaths were a consequence of battle.
Forrest later became a member of the Klan, which intimidated and threatened Southern blacks. His level of involvement in the Klan is a source of argument, and he is believed to have helped disband the first incarnation of the Klan in 1869.
Supporters praise him for offering to free 45 of his own slaves if they would serve in the Confederacy. They also claim Forrest was reluctant to divide families when he bought slaves.
Forrest died in 1877 and his body was moved to Forrest Park in the early 1900s. The tree-lined park about as large as a city block is just miles from the old Lorraine Hotel, the site of Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination in 1968.
King's murder is a cloud that lingers over Memphis long after the civil rights leader was slain. Race remains an undercurrent in many aspects of daily life. Not until last year did the city name its first street for King.
This is not the first time Forrest Park has sparked acrid debate. Memphis officials, led by the city's black mayor, rejected an effort to rename it in 2005. Other cities in the U.S. have also wrestled with the issue of naming parks and buildings after Forrest.
In 2008, a majority white school board in Jacksonville, Fla., rejected an attempt to rename Nathan Bedford Forrest High School.
Last September, the City Council in Selma, Ala. voted to stop work on a monument honoring Forrest at a city cemetery after someone removed Forrest's bust from the site. The apparent theft had led to protests by civil rights advocates not to replace it.
And, in December, Dixie State College in Utah removed a bronze statue of Confederate soldiers from campus.
Tennessee also has a state park named for Forrest and a modern-day statue of him in Nashville erected on private land.
The most recent move to rename the Memphis park began in January.
Councilman Myron Lowery proposed renaming Forrest Park after Ida B. Wells, a black journalist who exposed the horrors of lynching and fought for civil rights for African-Americans and women.
At a park committee meeting last month, Councilwoman Janis Fullilove left in tears after another council member, Bill Boyd, defended Forrest as a benefactor and promoter of black people after the Civil War.
Fullilove, who is black, denounced Boyd's comments as lies. Boyd, who is white, has proposed keeping Forrest's name on the park and renaming a separate city park after Wells.
Historians at Tuesday's meeting of the park commission meeting highlighted the ambiguity of Forrest's legacy.
Rhodes College historian Charles McKinney said Forrest represents subjugation and division. But historian and Sons of Confederate Veterans member Lee Millar said slave trading was a part of doing business in the South in Forrest's day.
"Forrest was known as a very humane slave trader," said Millar, who is white. "He never split families. He allowed his slaves for sale to seek their own master."
A committee including historians, council members and an NAACP representative will discuss what to permanently name the parks. Some black and white council members hope the process helps bring people together.
Others say the city needs to discuss more pressing matters such as crime and education.
"I don't care if it's named for Nathan Bedford Forrest," said Councilman Harold Collins, who is black. "He's a dead man."
We have "Black History Month," and it's not racist. These parks and places were named after people directly related to black history. One can't pick and choose things that happened in the past, glorify one, and bastardize the other. We don't have "White History Month," because that would be racist, and someone would get offended. I think people need to loosen up a little bit. No sense continuing to be butthurt and offended by things that happened 150 years ago. How about concentrating your anger and frustration within your communities NOW, and stop the senseless violence caused by people who still blame that guy who's statue is in the park for all of the bad that's happened to you, even though he died two or more generations before you were BORN.
@Harley-H.S.C. So honoring someone who kept and sold slaves and started the KKK is just fine? That said, why is the KKK organizing a protest over protecting the park?
Â
Sorry, this guy was a monster and needs to be viewed as such. Naming a park after him is NOT the way he needs to be remembered. Remembering what he did to others and how poorly he viewed human life is.
@what? Maybe if there was no NAACP, La Raza, or any other organization and holiday that casts spotlight on a race or ethnicity, then maybe there would not be a park that honors a slave trader with ties to the KKK. Maybe all men (and women) are created equal as our Bill of Rights states. This kind of treatment only continues to galvanize the divide between races and ethnicities.
I was born and grew up in the memphis area. i have known since i was a child that the park and statue glorifying nathan bedford forrest were offensive and would someday go away. we knew this because vandals painted graffiti all over his statue on a regular basis and this kept the issue alive for years. i am glad to see him go away at long last.
Â
that being said, there is no point in pretending the civil war never existed and park names which allude to this are quaint reminders that we do, indeed, have a history - for better or for worse - and let us remember and learn.Â
George Washington himself was a slave owner, and we are not going to rename everything. I am not comparing him to Forrest, but the notion that we must subdue history is questionable. We have proud moments and not so proud moments - true for many decisions our leaders made. Heck, even Truman was listed as KKK member at some time. We have a Pope with a Nazi youth history and so on. Really depends how we deal with it with respect to what these things meant at the time, not what we think they mean now.
I think anybody that lays awake a night and is mad or offended by something that happened 150 years ago needs to have their head examined!
Â
While your at it why not tear down Auschwitz and the memorial at Pearl Harbor and rename those too!
Â
Those people that are so willing to forget our nation's history are bound to repeat it!
@Handsup70 Because people will find a way to complain no matter what concessions are made to their benefit. What happened a few hundred years ago to the Indians by the white man has nothing to do with me. What the "white devil" did to blacks a century ago and during the 50s and 60s isnt my fault and I'm not going to apologize either. Affirmative action, black history month, this or that, people will never be happy. Maybe if minorities and gang bangers stop shooting each other and start doing something to benefit themselves with what they have been given, I'll feel differently
We can't rewrite history, we learn by it.Â
Why change it now? It is history, that is how we learn to move forward, plain and simple.
With the passive liberals re-writing history all across the nation, (remember the re-write of the Texas school texts), our nations history is vastly changed form the actual events. Sure, there were injustices in our young nation. Slavery and the forced drive to place native Americans on reservations are shameful IMO. To ignore or hide and forget what our history really is though is to beg to repeat the mistakes we've already made. Maybe not in the same way, but some version of injustice. As far as renaming school mascots go, its ridiculous. Those names were chosen with pride. The Chiefs, The Braves, these names should inspire pride in heritage. Â
 @SargeMcC "To many Texans, however, whatâs more mind-boggling are some of the revisions. Critics charge that they promote Christian fundamentalism, boost conservative political figures, and force-feed American âexceptionalism,â while downplaying the historical contributions of minorities."  Yes far right evangelical McCleary wants to do this rewrite. Yea, very liberal.Â
Hmm I don't see what the up roar is over Mr. Forrest was a Democrat
 @Exiled_Patriot Sarcasm? The southern democrats and northern were pro slavery.
The GOP, Lincoln's party freed the slaves. Â
maybe a re-match is in order? I wonder how differently things might turn out the 2nd time around, what with all the western states now in the mix....excluding Mexifornia of course.......that one is already gone.
"I don't care if it's named for Nathan Bedford Forrest," said Councilman Harold Collins, who is black. "He's a dead man."
That's a good, healthy attitude. When they took the "Lee/Jackson" out of Lee/King/Jackson Day in the South, it didn't stop people from calling it Lee/King/Jackson day. It just changed the name on the school calendars.
I donât care much for the idea of changing the name of a park, but I donât live there. This can be a cautionary tale as well as remembering history as it happened, not as we wished it did. Believing he was doing the right thing, Forrest did his best and you canât change that.
 @tats76 "Believing he was doing the right thing, Forrest did his best and you canât change that."
That could also be said about a number of Germans in the 1930-1945 period. Does that justify naming a park after them?
Learn about Forrest - the man was an arrogant, bigoted, violent human bring. In HS mind, the kkk was simply trying to "bring law and order to the n*****s".
 @OrcasThunder You misunderstood me. Take it as a lesson, not as honoring a hero. He believed in what he was doing - that can be a cautionary tale.
@tats76 Yeah ok. Let's celebrate the concept of 'doing the right thing' that slave trading and the KKK really convey.
 @what? You misunderstood me. I'm not talking about celebrating him, but learning from what his fervor did.
History is history, we are supposed to learn from it. Why are we so anxious to strip it away as thought it never happened, do we want to relive it again.
Â
For better or for worse leave it the hell alone.
@al_wa Because the Democrats don't want people to know who demanded slavery and who founded the KKK. Democrats in this nation have always demanded some one else work to support them. Look at today the welfare state people demanding that others work so they don't have to.
 @Exiled_Patriot  @al_wa As if the GOP has held so strongly to the principles of Abe Lincoln - an avowed Socialist and admired by Marx...
While I see the purpose for the push in a name change, I wonder how far in our attempt to become 100% "P.C." are we willing to go. Rename high school mascots, because they are possibly offensive to the Native Americans. Now changing a n historical name of a park because of a perceived definition not even the true reason for the name? It is getting too much IMO.
 @aintno1special "because of a perceived definition not even the true reason for the name"
How does a known history as a slave trader and being the founder of the kkk amount to a simple "perception"?
 @OrcasThunder The name of the park is not currently "Nathan Bedford Forrest Park" it is Confederate Park. But not the point you are making I trust.
Â
So by renaming it and what, removing the statue of Forrest, we will be righting all the wrongs of our founders past? Rewriting history or merely sweeping it under the rug out of shame or just as some symbolic measure of faith aimed at appeasement?
Â
I think what was done was horrific and tragic, my ancestors were Native American, so I may be more biased than most. However, I don't think hiding the history under a new name or symbol does anything...except make those doing it feel better about what their "fathers" did.
 @OrcasThunder sorry, meant to respond to aintno1special Â
 @lazarus Are you responding to me? I did not say that they were all one park - in fact I only mentioned his name, not the park.
Â
I really have no problem with parks named "Confederate" and even "Jefferson Davis".
   @OrcasThunder you've got it wrong. i am from memphis. nathan bedford park, confederate park, and jefferson davis park are three separate and distinct parks. i, personally, have always known NBF was offensive and should go. the other two are pretty benign, though, and i feel they should be left alone.