Romneys paid $1.94 million in federal taxes for 2011

WASHINGTON (AP) - Mitt Romney, one of the wealthiest candidates ever to seek the presidency, paid nearly $2 million in federal taxes on the $13.7 million in income reported for himself and his wife last year, his U.S. returns showed Friday. That comes to an effective tax rate of 14.1 percent, lower than millions of middle-income Americans but actually more than he had to pay.
Most of Romney's income was from investment returns. That is why his rate was lower than taxpayers whose income was mostly from wages, which can be taxed at higher rates.
Romney's taxes have emerged as a key issue during the 2012 presidential race with President Barack Obama. Romney released his 2010 returns in January, but he continues to decline to disclose returns from previous years - including those while he worked at Bain Capital, the private equity firm he co-founded.
The Obama campaign and other Democrats have pushed for fuller disclosures, reminding the Republican candidate that his father, George Romney, released a dozen years of returns when he ran for president.
There also has been Democratic criticism of Romney's foreign investments. Several tax law experts said Friday that his newly released tax returns would not be much help in resolving critics' questions about his sprawling finances - whether he used aggressive tax-deferral strategies, what might be the specifics and tax advantages of his numerous offshore investments, what was the source of his massive retirement account and what are the details behind his now-closed $3 million Swiss bank account.
Apparently hoping to resolve basic questions voters might have, the Romney campaign also released a letter from his accountants saying that in the 20 years prior to 2010 the Romneys paid an average annual effective rate of 20.2 percent, never lower than 13.66 percent. On average, middle-income families - those making from $50,000 to $75,000 a year - pay 12.8 percent of their income in federal taxes, according to Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation. But many pay a higher rate.
The former Massachusetts governor, whose wealth is estimated at perhaps $250 million, is aggressively competing with Obama for the support of middle class voters.
Obama's own tax return for last year showed that he and his wife, Michelle, paid $162,074 in federal taxes on $789,674 in adjusted gross income, an effective tax rate of 20.5 percent. Their income plunged from $1.7 million in 2010, with declining sales of the president's books. In 2009, the Obamas reported income of $5.5 million, fueled by the best-selling books.
The Romneys' tax bill could have been lower.
For the year, they claimed a deduction for $2.25 million of their $4.021 million in charitable contributions, said Brad Malt, trustee of the candidate's blind trust. They could have claimed more, Malt said, but the couple "limited their deductions of charitable contributions to conform to the governor's statement (n August, based on the January estimate of income, that he paid at least 13 percent in income taxes in each of the last 10 years."
Romney seemed to be painted into a corner by that statement, which came in reaction to Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's claim to have heard that the Republican had paid no taxes in some years.
Romney will surely be reminded by the Democrats that he also said in August, defending his right to pay no more taxes than he owed: "I don't pay more than are legally due, and frankly if I had paid more than are legally due I don't think I'd be qualified to become president."
He appears to be physically qualified by any measure.
The campaign released a separate report Friday - by Romney's longtime physician, Dr. Randall Gaz of Massachusetts General Hospital - that said he is healthy and ready to meet the rigorous demands of the presidency.
The report said Romney's heart appears healthy, and he takes a baby aspirin and medicine to treat high cholesterol to help keep it that way. He doesn't smoke or drink. And his resting heart rate is a low 40 beats per minute, in the range of well-trained athletes and reminiscent of President George W. Bush, who also had a low resting rate.
Romney is 6 feet 1½ inches tall and weighs 184 pounds.
As for his taxes, the Romneys' 2011 rate was slightly above the 13.9 percent effective rate they paid for 2010 when their federal tax bill was about $3 million.
They paid federal taxes of $1,935,708 on income of $13,696.951 for last year, according to the returns filed Friday with the Internal Revenue Service. They had obtained a filing extension beyond the usual April 15 tax deadline. His campaign earlier estimated that he would pay about $3.2 million in taxes for the year, well above the $1.9 million actually paid.
Most of Romney's income is from investments held in a blind trust, and campaign aides have stressed that he makes no decisions on how his money is invested.
Most of the income for the year came from investments, which are now generally taxed at 15 percent whereas the top marginal rate for income from wages is 35 percent.
The Romneys reported $6.8 million in capital gains, such as from the sale of stocks and other securities, and $6.37 million from dividends and taxable interest.
Romney's vast fortune and his long association with Bain Capital have been much discussed this year.
Analysts said details about his investments could emerge only if Romney provided far more of his tax returns - including files dating back to his years at Bain, the private firm he left in 2001. Romney, who initially refused to disclose any tax returns, has drawn the line at providing those from the past two years.
"All the important compliance and policy questions relating to Romney's personal tax matters relate to the past," said Edward D. Kleinbard, a law professor at the University of Southern California and former chief of staff of Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation. "The issue has never been Romney's 2011 tax return - in fact, it is a distraction to the real issues."
Only multiple returns would provide details about Romney's $100 million retirement account and how it grew, Kleinbard said. He also earlier returns would be crucial in knowing how often he paid gift tax on family trusts.
Joseph Bankman, a Stanford University law school professor and expert on tax law, said, "It's the Bain years we'd really need to know to have a full assessment of his tax strategies." Bankman said that the 2010 and 2011 returns "only raised these questions, but they can't provide real answers."
___
Associated Press writers Stephen Braun, Stephen Ohlemacher, Kasie Hunt and Philip Elliott contributed.
Most of Romney's income was from investment returns. That is why his rate was lower than taxpayers whose income was mostly from wages, which can be taxed at higher rates.
Romney's taxes have emerged as a key issue during the 2012 presidential race with President Barack Obama. Romney released his 2010 returns in January, but he continues to decline to disclose returns from previous years - including those while he worked at Bain Capital, the private equity firm he co-founded.
The Obama campaign and other Democrats have pushed for fuller disclosures, reminding the Republican candidate that his father, George Romney, released a dozen years of returns when he ran for president.
There also has been Democratic criticism of Romney's foreign investments. Several tax law experts said Friday that his newly released tax returns would not be much help in resolving critics' questions about his sprawling finances - whether he used aggressive tax-deferral strategies, what might be the specifics and tax advantages of his numerous offshore investments, what was the source of his massive retirement account and what are the details behind his now-closed $3 million Swiss bank account.
Apparently hoping to resolve basic questions voters might have, the Romney campaign also released a letter from his accountants saying that in the 20 years prior to 2010 the Romneys paid an average annual effective rate of 20.2 percent, never lower than 13.66 percent. On average, middle-income families - those making from $50,000 to $75,000 a year - pay 12.8 percent of their income in federal taxes, according to Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation. But many pay a higher rate.
The former Massachusetts governor, whose wealth is estimated at perhaps $250 million, is aggressively competing with Obama for the support of middle class voters.
Obama's own tax return for last year showed that he and his wife, Michelle, paid $162,074 in federal taxes on $789,674 in adjusted gross income, an effective tax rate of 20.5 percent. Their income plunged from $1.7 million in 2010, with declining sales of the president's books. In 2009, the Obamas reported income of $5.5 million, fueled by the best-selling books.
The Romneys' tax bill could have been lower.
For the year, they claimed a deduction for $2.25 million of their $4.021 million in charitable contributions, said Brad Malt, trustee of the candidate's blind trust. They could have claimed more, Malt said, but the couple "limited their deductions of charitable contributions to conform to the governor's statement (n August, based on the January estimate of income, that he paid at least 13 percent in income taxes in each of the last 10 years."
Romney seemed to be painted into a corner by that statement, which came in reaction to Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's claim to have heard that the Republican had paid no taxes in some years.
Romney will surely be reminded by the Democrats that he also said in August, defending his right to pay no more taxes than he owed: "I don't pay more than are legally due, and frankly if I had paid more than are legally due I don't think I'd be qualified to become president."
He appears to be physically qualified by any measure.
The campaign released a separate report Friday - by Romney's longtime physician, Dr. Randall Gaz of Massachusetts General Hospital - that said he is healthy and ready to meet the rigorous demands of the presidency.
The report said Romney's heart appears healthy, and he takes a baby aspirin and medicine to treat high cholesterol to help keep it that way. He doesn't smoke or drink. And his resting heart rate is a low 40 beats per minute, in the range of well-trained athletes and reminiscent of President George W. Bush, who also had a low resting rate.
Romney is 6 feet 1½ inches tall and weighs 184 pounds.
As for his taxes, the Romneys' 2011 rate was slightly above the 13.9 percent effective rate they paid for 2010 when their federal tax bill was about $3 million.
They paid federal taxes of $1,935,708 on income of $13,696.951 for last year, according to the returns filed Friday with the Internal Revenue Service. They had obtained a filing extension beyond the usual April 15 tax deadline. His campaign earlier estimated that he would pay about $3.2 million in taxes for the year, well above the $1.9 million actually paid.
Most of Romney's income is from investments held in a blind trust, and campaign aides have stressed that he makes no decisions on how his money is invested.
Most of the income for the year came from investments, which are now generally taxed at 15 percent whereas the top marginal rate for income from wages is 35 percent.
The Romneys reported $6.8 million in capital gains, such as from the sale of stocks and other securities, and $6.37 million from dividends and taxable interest.
Romney's vast fortune and his long association with Bain Capital have been much discussed this year.
Analysts said details about his investments could emerge only if Romney provided far more of his tax returns - including files dating back to his years at Bain, the private firm he left in 2001. Romney, who initially refused to disclose any tax returns, has drawn the line at providing those from the past two years.
"All the important compliance and policy questions relating to Romney's personal tax matters relate to the past," said Edward D. Kleinbard, a law professor at the University of Southern California and former chief of staff of Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation. "The issue has never been Romney's 2011 tax return - in fact, it is a distraction to the real issues."
Only multiple returns would provide details about Romney's $100 million retirement account and how it grew, Kleinbard said. He also earlier returns would be crucial in knowing how often he paid gift tax on family trusts.
Joseph Bankman, a Stanford University law school professor and expert on tax law, said, "It's the Bain years we'd really need to know to have a full assessment of his tax strategies." Bankman said that the 2010 and 2011 returns "only raised these questions, but they can't provide real answers."
___
Associated Press writers Stephen Braun, Stephen Ohlemacher, Kasie Hunt and Philip Elliott contributed.
He also donated over 4M to charity.Â
Â
NICE OF THE AP CLOWNS TO LEAVE THAT OUT, with the blessings of HOMO news again.
Â
This is meaningless. I want a person of integrity, character and honor to represent the United States as our Chief Executive. Obama is a fake, vacationing dead beat empty suit. A user with no qualifications.
Â
Community organizer. What the !@$##!% is that? Affirmative action class envy nobody.
Â
Like Eastwood said, if the man is not doing the job we need to let him go. And how. And NOW.
Â
And Komo, up yours for the stupid picture. Talk about deliberate you biased jack wagons.
Â
GET OBOZO OUT. VOTE ROMNEY AND GIVE HIM A CHANCE OVER BARRY MARX.
 @pbs7mm Name call much?
The 4 m to charity was an intended  write off as well or the 1.94 would have been much higher. I hope this guy can beat Obama but he keeps opening his mouth and the wrong message comes out.
As much as I cannot stand Gov. "Etch A Sketch" Romney it is not fair for KOMO to keep using that silly picture of him. I am sure you guys have a better stock photo of him.
 @Hagar I like this one: http://www.google.com/imgres?um=1&hl=en&client=firefox-a&sa=N&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&biw=1366&bih=651&tbm=isch&tbnid=qdHIy8tQF0G8CM:&imgrefurl=http://zennie62blog.com/2012/09/21/did-mitt-romney-brown-his-face-for-univision-town-hall-yes-37387/&docid=-e7PiSOp8PTkOM&imgurl=http://www.zennie62blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/romney-brown-face.jpg&w=651&h=470&ei=wk5dUPC0MNDwiQKz74DIAQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=377&vpy=162&dur=315&hovh=166&hovw=230&tx=138&ty=122&sig=114772471440713746122&page=1&tbnh=134&tbnw=186&start=0&ndsp=18&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0,i:78
Harry Reids Walls
Â
"Well the walls come tumbling down the walls come tumbling down Just when you think you've got it made the walls come tumbling down"
Â
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/sep/21/nevada-republican-harry-reid-make-our-day-release-/
 @ByeByeBarry http://youtu.be/9Vr842TpBWE
But did he tithe 10% to the church? If so, even if I don't like him, I'll at least give him credit for being consistent with his beliefs.
 @Bellevue Scott if he did it because he is Mormon and the thing to do, yes.
But if I remember correctly, he had to amend his 2010 taxes to retroactively donate more to make up the difference.
Â
Its is speculated that part of the reason he won't release 10 years worth of taxes is becuase it will show he has been giving a lot less than 10%Â and that would make him look bad.
Â
 @T H I S  @Bellevue Scott what president has had to show 10 years worth of tax returns? did you forget that the kenned'y were extremely rich as well but they did not show there tax returns.
William Jefferson Clinton
Net worth: $38 millionIn office: 1993 - 200142nd president.
Â
John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Net worth: $1 billion In office: 1961 - 1963 35th presidentNow
Â
Shut up and move Forward! Â
Â
 @Tacobender 49Â
Great examples.
kenedy left office with 5.7 unemployment,
Clinton left with 4.00 unemployment.
Yup, we need mroe democrats in office.
Â
 @Tacobender 49 The issue isn't just wealth. Your disconnect is amazing.
 @WhatRJDidÂ
Â
"The issue isn't just wealth"
Â
No your right.
The issue is liberals...that think wealth is the entire issue. Does the 1% ring a bell? Liberals (socialists) that believe everyone should share equally. In fact you hide behind the title of liberal, in reality the Democrat party has been hijacked by Marxists, Socialists, and Communists. And while you unite in your quest now, if you win, one day, as history has proven, you will fight for power amongst yourselves. One group of leftists thinking the other group isn't far left enough.
Â
 The problem is your disconnect, your inability to understand that government does not create jobs, the private sector does. Oh sure, government can create government jobs but who pays for it? The private sector does! So while Obama goes about his business of destroying the private sector (smallest workforce in 30 years, over 8% unemployment for over 42 months, fulfilling the left's general war on "evil business"  real unemployment is near 19%) you cheer him on, incoherent of the fact that he is borrowing the money to maintain the public sector jobs. That is where the "stimulus" money went. That and a pipe dream (presently) of "green energy" and "green jobs." (Where are those MILLIONS of green jobs Obama and Biden promised?) When those loans become due and the private sector can no longer create enough wealth to pay those debts this country will be in real trouble, and so will you liberals. The people of this country are going to come after you and members of your propaganda arm, the mainstream media. Your scared of our guns now? Just wait until you get close to destroying our country. You are.
Â
 @Hagar  @ByeByeBarry  @WhatRJDid "If so, then a proper disclosure might be in order."
Â
Dream on...that would require a modicum of character...
 @ByeByeBarry  @WhatRJDid Copied almost verbatim from Mint Rawmoney's web site. Do you work for his campaign? If so, then a proper disclosure might be in order.
 @OrcasThunder "
"You people have so grossly twisted our positions that you might as well be speaking in tongues - the two sides simply are not using the same language."
Â
It is intentional. They can not rationally and factually argue against what Liberals are saying, so they have to use strawman arguments.
Â
Â
Liberals: "we need to stop spending so much on the military"
Conservative: "Why do liberals what the united states to not have a military?"
Â
Liberals: "Maybe banning assualt riffled, and high capacity magazines would limiti mass shootings"
Conservatives: "why do liberals want to ban all guns?"
Â
Liberals: "The tax code is allowing the wealthiest to not contribute fairly while running up the debt."
Conservatives: "Why do you want to take all themoney from rich people?"
Â
Â
 @ByeByeBarry  @WhatRJDid "Liberals (socialists) that believe everyone should share equally"...
The only people I know who say or think that are right wing nutcases who drank the entire swamp of kool-aid...
You people have so grossly twisted our positions that you might as well be speaking in tongues - the two sides simply are not using the same language.
This "socialist" crap got old a very long time ago - and it's totally untrue and a fabrication. What it does is make you sound like fear-mongers without a message...you speak in verse from some old moldy playbook that is reminiscent of people like Joe McCarthy...you toss out "truths" like breadcrumbs luring the geese to the trap...and yet you are continuously evading the real truth based in facts by either deflection or simply ignoring it.
And then, when there is a threat of your losing the political democratic vote, you mumble about bringing out your guns...? Is that the pathetic kind of "America" your revered founding fathers envisioned?
 @ByeByeBarry  @WhatRJDid "The issue is liberals...that think wealth is the entire issue."
Â
You are SOOOOO deluded in what you "see" as our issues with Willard...It's not the money, stupid, it's the arrogance!
 @ByeByeBarry "Does the 1% ring a bell? Liberals (socialists) that believe everyone should share equally"
Â
Oh look, a strawman. No one is arguing that everything should be shared equally.
-----------------------------
"In fact you hide behind the title of liberal, in reality the Democrat party has been hijacked by Marxists, Socialists, and Communists"
Â
Oh look, more strawman and projection. Socialists.. sure. Im ok with that. But please list all the marxists and communists and what specifically makes them comunists.  Â
Dificulty: No farking lying.
Â
And the projection is from a republican whos pary has been hijacked by a bunch of john galt wannabes.Â
Â
Â
--------------------------------
"your inability to understand that government does not create jobs, the private sector does."
Â
But you will still sit there and blame Obama for unemployment.
-------------------------------------------
Â
"So while Obama goes about his business of destroying the private sector (smallest workforce in 30 years, over 8% unemployment for over 42 months, fulfilling "
Â
Yup, blaming Obama.
So again, I would like a specific list of things Obama has done to "destroy the private sector"Â
Â
OH, and then there is this:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/privatejobs_aug10.jpg
Â
Yeah, your whole talking point is a lie.Â
Â
-------------------------------------------
"When those loans become due and the private sector can no longer create enough wealth to pay those debts this country will be in real trouble, and so will you liberals."
Â
Then maybe, in 2001, when we were projected to have the debt paid off at the endof the decade, we should not have passed a large tax cut and started a bunch of wars.Â
Â
OH, and the democrats have put spendiong cuts in their patform.Â
Â
What have the republicans offered? More farking tax cuts.Â
----------------------------------
The people of this country are going to come after you and members of your propaganda arm, the mainstream media
Â
Oh look, more projection.  Are you talking about the mainstream media that keeps reporting onthe BS things the GOP does?Â
-----------------------------------
Your scared of our guns now?
Should I be? You are you actually on the internet threatening people?
Â
Oh yeah, you came unarmed last time, but the liberals are the dangerous ones.
------------------------------
Â
Just wait until you get close to destroying our country.Â
Â
Oh look, you ended your post with even more projection.Â
Â
 @WhatRJDid Its called deflection. When they are not projecting, exhibiting cognative dissonance, or just pretending facts don't matter, they are deflecting.Â
 @T H I S  @WhatRJDid what has obama done for us?  besides giving us the biggest tax increase our country has ever had, and selling guns to criminals in another country, and bowing to foreign leaders, saying sorry to japan for dropping the a-bomb on them, and not doing anything while our embassy's are attacked, saying sorry for a stupid movie that was made and put on youtube. what about his famous quote "if you have a succesfull business..... you didn't build that...... somebody else...... made that happen." " somewhere along the way..... somebody gave you help.... somewhere in your life there was a great teacher."
 @T H I S  @WhatRJDid Deflection, you mean like Obama Foreign policy in the Mideast. Oh, it's not me it was the Video.
Â
Dems are so disconnected from the truth.
Â
What a joke!Â
Mitt Romney in July of this year:Â "I donât pay more than are legally due and frankly if I had paid more than are legally due I donât think Iâd be qualified to become president. Iâd think people would want me to follow the law and pay only what the tax code requires."
Â
So, in his 2011 tax return, he could have paid just 9% on that 13.7 million, vastly less than ANY working person in this country. But he didn't. By his own word, he isn't fit to be president.
Â
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/09/21/divine-comedy-romney-releases-his-2011-tax-return-and-an-snl-skit-is-born/
Â
Â
Seriously, not one Romney defender has touched this with a ten foot pole. In four hours.
BWHAHAHAHAHA crickets, eh?
 @WhatRJDid But at least Romney is not near.
Â
 @WhatRJDid "excuse me while I whip this out"
 @T H I S Like the Sheriff ;)
You Liberal Happy now?Shut up and move Forward!Â
 @Tacobender 49 We all knew he was required by law to release this return, and no, we're not happy, because he insisted Paul Ryan give him ten years, but he'll only give the American voters 2.
Â
And why did he not take all the deductions he could? He overpaid his taxes. By his own statement in July of this year, he said he wouldn't be qualified to be the president if he didn't take every deduction he could. He did it so he wouldn't have to turn over a return showing 9% taxes paid on 13.7 million dollars. And he can file an amended return later and get the money back.
Â
Romney can't keep a single thing straight, can he?
 @WhatRJDid RJ, there is no law requiring him to release his returns, or more specifically, this return. A public disclosure statement is the only legal requirement.Â
 @JCCBlvu What do you think about him saying that he is not qualified to be president now? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NP0mQeLWCCo
Go change your underwear. It's Friday.
"They could have claimed more, Malt said, but the couple "limited their deductions of charitable contributions to conform to the governor's statement (n August, based on the January estimate of income, that he paid at least 13 percent in income taxes in each of the last 10 years.""
In other words, he didn't want to show just how low he really paid...
Â
Anyone want to take odds on how long it will take for him to file an amended return to show the "real" deduction after he loses the election?
Â
 @OrcasThunder I'm more interested in his response to his statement this Summer saying he wouldn't be qualified to be president if he didn't take every deduction he could.
 @WhatRJDid I had forgotten that...more backtrack ahead...!
 @WhatRJDid RJ, You are also the one who thinks Congress and the Senate are different. The House of Reps and the Senate together make up Congress. We have a bicameral congress.Â
Â
So, anything you say now is irrelevant to me.
 @T H I S Good spin. Good spin. Go back and look at the context of my original comment.
 @JCCBlvu You started an argument about semantics to keep people from talking about Romney's missing tax returns to prove he is not one of the 47% he is complaining about.
think long and hard about that as you crawl into bed tonight. Let that be the last thing you think about.
Â
@OrcasThunder
I said:Â Congress created this fiasco. Â Congress is responsible. Â Â The Senate needs to blame themselves for this one.
Â
I said the Senate needs to blame themselves for this one because it was a Senate report!
 @JCCBlvu But in your original statement you equated the Senate and the Congress - completely ignoring the House when you placed the blame. The House is not without it's share of the blame - and a sizable portion of the entire mess.
 @OrcasThunder No, the House and the Senate are different. Together they make up Congress.
 @WhatRJDid  @JCCBlvu "vastly less than ANY working person in this country"
Not only that, but almost nothing seems to be income from wages or salary...which is the way 99% of the American people earn their income. The man's only "job" is running for political office!
 @JCCBlvu  @WhatRJDid "RJ, You are also the one who thinks Congress and the Senate are different."...
And they are different chambers of the Congress. Different qualifications, different numbers, different rules, different terms, different ranking when it comes to matters of State such as confirming appointments.Â
 @JCCBlvu  @WhatRJDid But, if he said that "I donât pay more than are legally due and frankly if I had paid more than are legally due I donât think Iâd be qualified to become president. Iâd think people would want me to follow the law and pay only what the tax code requires." - and yet now admits that he did pay more that legally due...to keep his rate from looking even lower...does that not make him, BY HIS OWN WORDS, "unqualified" for the office of President?
Â
Sure, it's silly nitpicking - but it's a nitpick of his own creation. If he HAD taken the full deduction, he wouldn't have to answer to those who say he says one thing then does another...which is what he has done.
Seriously, no one is saying he isn't "ENTITLED" to pay more than he owes, we are simply pointing out that his stated reason is dumb...lame...political slight of hand.
Â
And it's such an obvious ploy to make him look "like us" that it's hardly worth laughing over - except that it's just another dumb move in a long succession of dumb moves...
 @T H I S What someone is called (title) has no bearing on the fact that Congress is the collective term for both legislative branches.
Â
In the United States, the term Congress refers jointly to both houses of that country's national bicameral legislature, the Senate and the House of Representatives. Members of the Senate are typically referred to as "Senators", whereas members of the House of Representatives are referred to as "Representatives". Whereas the term Member of Congress applies to members of both houses, the terms Congressman and Congresswoman usually refer only to members of the House of Representatives.
 @JCCBlvu While technicaly correct, the Senate and the House make up congress.
From a semantic perspective, everyone has pretty much called the house congress and the senate the senate.
Â
A person is a Senator or a Congressmen. Sometimes "Representative" is used. But it is usually "congressmen" to denote someone who serves in the house of representatives.
So yeah, you made a technically correct statement that has no relevence to the discussion at hand, and from a common language perspected you are kind of making a fool of your self.
Â
But hey, keep saying things.
Â
 @WhatRJDid So no, I referenced Congress. I didn't reference the House.
@WhatRJDidHere is what I did say:Â Â
Senate report: Microsoft used loopholes to avoid billions in taxes
"Everyone wants to blame the cook (Microsoft) instead of the kitchen (Congress).  Microsoft hasn't done anything wrong.  Congress created this fiasco.  Congress is responsible.   The Senate needs to blame themselves for this one."
 @WhatRJDid The fact he realizes he didn't take all the deductions he is legally entitled to answers that question for you. The problem is when you do not know you are entitled to them. Nobody is "required" to take a deduction but you should be aware you can take it.
 @JCCBlvu You misspoke when you referenced the house and then said the senate should blame themselves. And now you're being a giant nozzle about it.
Â
Â
 @JCCBlvu
Yeah, he would be too irresponsible to be president. And since he said that in July, and released this tax return today, and he didn't take all his deductions we can conclude...........?
 @WhatRJDid RJ, do you pay more taxes than you are required to? His statement about not being qualified to be president was making reference to the fact that if he was irresponsible with his money (paying more taxes than required) then he would be too irresponsible to be president.
 @JCCBlvu What, no answer?
C'mon dude!
Â
Mitt Romney in July of this year:Â "I donât pay more than are legally due and frankly if I had paid more than are legally due I donât think Iâd be qualified to become president. Iâd think people would want me to follow the law and pay only what the tax code requires."
Â
So, in his 2011 tax return, he could have paid just 9% on that 13.7 million, vastly less than ANY working person in this country. But he didn't. By his own word, he isn't fit to be president.
Â
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/09/21/divine-comedy-romney-releases-his-2011-tax-return-and-an-snl-skit-is-born/
 @JCCBlvu **Yawn**
 @WhatRJDid LOL. Congress does the budget. The House of Reps nor the Senate can do anything alone.  Â
Â
The article yesterday was a review of a Senate study saying Microsoft used loopholes to avoid taxes.
Â
Congress (the House and the Senate) pass the laws.
 @JCCBlvu Don't trust me, trust a link. Or two. Or four.
Â
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/09/21/divine-comedy-romney-releases-his-2011-tax-return-and-an-snl-skit-is-born/
Â
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/romney-paid-required-raising-tax-rate-141-percent/story?id=17291504#.UF0V4VFudNI
Â
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012/09/21/romney-taxes/57821564/1
Â
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-09-21/romney-tax-return-shows-14-dot-1-percent-rate-on-13-dot-7-million-in-income
W @JCCBlvu Who spends the money? Who does the budget? You blamed the senate for the actions of the house, Einstein.