Same-sex military couples struggle for recognition

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) - Sgt. Karen Alexander fought for her country in Iraq, but back home she often feels the U.S. Army is fighting against her.
Married to another female soldier with a 4-year-old son, Alexander is denied the same housing allowance and other family-friendly benefits she would be entitled to if married to a man. As far as Uncle Sam is concerned, she's still single.
"I'm married to my best friend, who just happens to be of the same sex as me," said Alexander, 29, who is stationed at Fort Bragg. "We fight for everyone else's rights, but we're treated as second-class citizens."
Nearly a year and half after President Obama and Congress ended "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," same-sex couples are faced with daily reminders of the conflict inherent in serving openly as gays and lesbians under a government that still refuses to acknowledge their relationships.
Pentagon officials say they are bound by the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which forbids the federal government from recognizing any marriage other than that between a man and a woman.
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on the constitutionality of DOMA in June, but advocacy groups say there are numerous steps the Pentagon could take now to treat struggling same-sex military couples more fairly.
Among the steps proposed by such advocacy groups as OutServe-Servicemembers Legal Defense Network and the American Military Partner Association are issuing military IDs to same-sex spouses, ensuring spouses have full access to on-base social programs, and letting same-sex couples qualify for military housing.
"Clearly DOMA prevents commanders from truly treating their service members equally, but there is so much they could do to treat them with greater equity," said Allyson Robinson, Outserve-SLDN's executive director. "The fact they choose not to is shocking."
The Defense Department's public response to these proposals hasn't changed over the past year.
"The Department is conducting a deliberative and comprehensive review of the possibility of extending eligibility for benefits, when legally permitted, to same-sex domestic partners," Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen wrote in an e-mail this week. "The benefits are being examined from a policy, fiscal, legal and feasibility perspective."
Almost verbatim, that's the same message conveyed to gay-rights activists in March 2012 by acting Undersecretary of Defense Jo Ann Rooney.
Robinson said it was possible that military leaders were waiting for the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on DOMA. If the law is struck down, which is by no means certain, the military would have a clear path to treat married sex-sex couples equally.
"If they're waiting, that in itself is a troubling decision," Robinson said. "For some of these service members, waiting even a few months is an incredible difficulty."
The next step for the activist groups will be putting pressure on Chuck Hagel, President Barack Obama's nominee to be the next defense secretary, in hopes that he will take up the cause if he is confirmed.
Hagel, a former Republican senator, has apologized for 1998 remarks referring to an ambassadorial nominee as "openly, aggressively gay" and he pledged this week in a letter to Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., to "do everything possible to the extent permissible under current law to provide equal benefits to the families of all our service members."
While the Pentagon brass ponders the issue, Alexander and her wife, Pvt. Allison Hanson, struggle to pay their bills.
The couple met in an Army training program for chemical, biological and nuclear warfare in 2010. They got married last year in Washington, D.C., one of an increasing number places where same-sex marriage is legal.
Despite assurances to the contrary before she transferred, it was only after Alexander reported for duty at Fort Bragg in September the couple learned that post officials would not approve money for off-base housing, even the lesser amount provided to single soldiers with no dependents. Hanson said exceptions are routinely granted to unmarried heterosexual soldiers for various domestic reasons, and that she believes commanders at Bragg have the discretion to do so in Alexander's case if they wanted to.
"I can't live in the barracks with her," said Hanson, a National Guard soldier who lost her job when she followed Alexander to North Carolina.
The couple got a tiny one-bedroom apartment in nearby Fayetteville, where inexpensive housing can be tough to come by. After rent, the payment for their shared car, insurance, utilities and other bills, Alexander's modest enlisted salary provides them less than a $100 a week.
"I don't know if people have this Will and Grace image of how homosexuals live, like we're all rich or something, but that's not the case at all," Alexander said. "We're lucky we're vegetarians, so we don't really spend that much money on food."
Hanson made the agonizing decision to send her son to live with her ex-husband and his new wife in Utah because they cannot afford to care for him.
Beyond pocketbook issues, same-sex couples based at Bragg say they face social stigma.
After returning from a nine-month tour in Afghanistan, 1st Lt. Nakisha Hardy and her civilian wife were invited to attend a retreat at the Pinehurst resort intended to help strengthen relationships that can be strained by long separations. Though Hardy was told in advance that a same-sex couple would be welcome, on the second day they were asked to leave by an Army chaplain.
"He said that the program is funded under DOMA and that we were making other families feel uncomfortable and creating a distraction," Hardy said. "It definitely makes you question whether the culture is changing. People's personal beliefs aren't going to change just because laws do."
Last month, Bragg received national attention when Ashley Broadway, who is married to Lt. Col. Heather Mack, was denied membership in the officers' spouses club because she does not have a spouse identification badge issued by the military.
Though she and Mack have been together for 15 years, the only pass base officials will provide to Broadway names her as a caregiver to their 2-year-old son - the same credential given to nannies.
On Thursday, the club announced they would allow Broadway admittance as a "guest member." She said Friday anything less than full membership is not acceptable.
"It's another slap in the face to my life and that of thousands of gay and lesbian soldiers because it basically it's like, 'Yes, please wear the uniform, please sacrifice, put yourself in harm's way, but, by the way, we're not going to take care of your family or your spouse back home,'" Broadway said.
Alexander and Hanson said change isn't coming fast enough. Although she says she loves military life and always thought she'd serve until retirement, Alexander is now considering leaving the Army she has served for nearly 10 years.
"The Pentagon has the option to change things, right now," Hanson said. "My wife and I both raised our right hands and swore to defend the Constitution. At what point does someone protect our rights?"
___
Crary reported from New York.
Married to another female soldier with a 4-year-old son, Alexander is denied the same housing allowance and other family-friendly benefits she would be entitled to if married to a man. As far as Uncle Sam is concerned, she's still single.
"I'm married to my best friend, who just happens to be of the same sex as me," said Alexander, 29, who is stationed at Fort Bragg. "We fight for everyone else's rights, but we're treated as second-class citizens."
Nearly a year and half after President Obama and Congress ended "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," same-sex couples are faced with daily reminders of the conflict inherent in serving openly as gays and lesbians under a government that still refuses to acknowledge their relationships.
Pentagon officials say they are bound by the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which forbids the federal government from recognizing any marriage other than that between a man and a woman.
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on the constitutionality of DOMA in June, but advocacy groups say there are numerous steps the Pentagon could take now to treat struggling same-sex military couples more fairly.
Among the steps proposed by such advocacy groups as OutServe-Servicemembers Legal Defense Network and the American Military Partner Association are issuing military IDs to same-sex spouses, ensuring spouses have full access to on-base social programs, and letting same-sex couples qualify for military housing.
"Clearly DOMA prevents commanders from truly treating their service members equally, but there is so much they could do to treat them with greater equity," said Allyson Robinson, Outserve-SLDN's executive director. "The fact they choose not to is shocking."
The Defense Department's public response to these proposals hasn't changed over the past year.
"The Department is conducting a deliberative and comprehensive review of the possibility of extending eligibility for benefits, when legally permitted, to same-sex domestic partners," Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen wrote in an e-mail this week. "The benefits are being examined from a policy, fiscal, legal and feasibility perspective."
Almost verbatim, that's the same message conveyed to gay-rights activists in March 2012 by acting Undersecretary of Defense Jo Ann Rooney.
Robinson said it was possible that military leaders were waiting for the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on DOMA. If the law is struck down, which is by no means certain, the military would have a clear path to treat married sex-sex couples equally.
"If they're waiting, that in itself is a troubling decision," Robinson said. "For some of these service members, waiting even a few months is an incredible difficulty."
The next step for the activist groups will be putting pressure on Chuck Hagel, President Barack Obama's nominee to be the next defense secretary, in hopes that he will take up the cause if he is confirmed.
Hagel, a former Republican senator, has apologized for 1998 remarks referring to an ambassadorial nominee as "openly, aggressively gay" and he pledged this week in a letter to Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., to "do everything possible to the extent permissible under current law to provide equal benefits to the families of all our service members."
While the Pentagon brass ponders the issue, Alexander and her wife, Pvt. Allison Hanson, struggle to pay their bills.
The couple met in an Army training program for chemical, biological and nuclear warfare in 2010. They got married last year in Washington, D.C., one of an increasing number places where same-sex marriage is legal.
Despite assurances to the contrary before she transferred, it was only after Alexander reported for duty at Fort Bragg in September the couple learned that post officials would not approve money for off-base housing, even the lesser amount provided to single soldiers with no dependents. Hanson said exceptions are routinely granted to unmarried heterosexual soldiers for various domestic reasons, and that she believes commanders at Bragg have the discretion to do so in Alexander's case if they wanted to.
"I can't live in the barracks with her," said Hanson, a National Guard soldier who lost her job when she followed Alexander to North Carolina.
The couple got a tiny one-bedroom apartment in nearby Fayetteville, where inexpensive housing can be tough to come by. After rent, the payment for their shared car, insurance, utilities and other bills, Alexander's modest enlisted salary provides them less than a $100 a week.
"I don't know if people have this Will and Grace image of how homosexuals live, like we're all rich or something, but that's not the case at all," Alexander said. "We're lucky we're vegetarians, so we don't really spend that much money on food."
Hanson made the agonizing decision to send her son to live with her ex-husband and his new wife in Utah because they cannot afford to care for him.
Beyond pocketbook issues, same-sex couples based at Bragg say they face social stigma.
After returning from a nine-month tour in Afghanistan, 1st Lt. Nakisha Hardy and her civilian wife were invited to attend a retreat at the Pinehurst resort intended to help strengthen relationships that can be strained by long separations. Though Hardy was told in advance that a same-sex couple would be welcome, on the second day they were asked to leave by an Army chaplain.
"He said that the program is funded under DOMA and that we were making other families feel uncomfortable and creating a distraction," Hardy said. "It definitely makes you question whether the culture is changing. People's personal beliefs aren't going to change just because laws do."
Last month, Bragg received national attention when Ashley Broadway, who is married to Lt. Col. Heather Mack, was denied membership in the officers' spouses club because she does not have a spouse identification badge issued by the military.
Though she and Mack have been together for 15 years, the only pass base officials will provide to Broadway names her as a caregiver to their 2-year-old son - the same credential given to nannies.
On Thursday, the club announced they would allow Broadway admittance as a "guest member." She said Friday anything less than full membership is not acceptable.
"It's another slap in the face to my life and that of thousands of gay and lesbian soldiers because it basically it's like, 'Yes, please wear the uniform, please sacrifice, put yourself in harm's way, but, by the way, we're not going to take care of your family or your spouse back home,'" Broadway said.
Alexander and Hanson said change isn't coming fast enough. Although she says she loves military life and always thought she'd serve until retirement, Alexander is now considering leaving the Army she has served for nearly 10 years.
"The Pentagon has the option to change things, right now," Hanson said. "My wife and I both raised our right hands and swore to defend the Constitution. At what point does someone protect our rights?"
___
Crary reported from New York.
I want the notes that i print on my Epson to be recognized as legal tender. Â Why shouldn't my 'money' be accepted?
How does the happiness i've achieved in my new found wealth affect what's in your wallet?
It's wrong but right now the military just doesn't know what to do. In reality the soldiers chain of command should be assisting them. Failures to do so should be met with IG complaints and congressional complaints.
If there is an organization that is slow to change it is the US Army. Married gay couples will likely have a hard time for a couple more years before things get better. Even after the Supreme court strikes down the DOMA it will be at least a year before the US Army and the rest of the military branches start implimenting policy. When Dont Ask Dont tell was repealed and gays were supposed to be able to serve openly in the military there was a lot of foot dragging and studies done for nearly a year before things settled down.
 @Charl317 The military s not slow to change, the Armed service was the first to integrate their forces. The Gays always want special treatment. Just be gay and live your life, no one really cares if your gay or straight these days.
@Telman@:Â
".... The Gays always want special treatment ...."
Â
No, they simply want EQUAL treatment.
I hope they don't get these incentives.
Â
 @skeetball:Â
Why?
@Skeetball I would hope that you can see how wrong you are.
@Skeetball Why do you care keyboard commando? The closet you've done to the military is Call of Duty.
 @Skeetball I really hope they do. And luckily in a few years they WILL.
I'm married to my best friend, who just happens to be of the same sex as me," said Alexander, 29, who is stationed at Fort Bragg. "We fight for everyone else's rights, but we're treated as second-class citizens."
who cares what the goverment thinks or any one else as long as your happy that is what life is about
If ya don't make headlines, yer 'struggling for recognition'?
It really is 'all about you' isn't it?
Â
The vast majority have gotten over it. Maybe it's time YOU should move on.
 @bobalouie "The vast majority have gotten over it."
And obviously you haven't. It is ABOUT being accepted as any other military spouse would be.
This is what liberalism leads to, next thing you will see is a muslim soldier demanding to have his multiple wives recognized because of his religion, and todays liberal judges will side with him too. Nobody knows what natural means anymore, what normal means. It makes me sick when somebody gets offended and asks for unisex bathrooms, because they're not sure which bathroom they belong in. Why do these stories make it on the news every day? Why do these stupid reporters keep writing stories about people who are offended. Report real problems please.
@commentator So it is your opinion that we refuse to respect the religions of others?
 @commentator:Â
".... Nobody knows what natural means anymore, what normal means ...."
Â
Really? That is your stance? "Natural" and "normal" are both subjective, different people view them in different ways.
Â
As for why these ztories make news - because even though you seem to be against knowing what is going on, others DO want to know. I know many people who are in same sex relationships, and I proudly watched as Jane & Pete-e got mairried on stage at the Seattle Men's Chorus HOliday Show on December 8. Why should basic considerations & rights that hetero couples are given simply for saying "I Do" be denied to same sex couples?
@LocalLady Because we need to draw the line somewhere, is there even a black and white, clear cut line in your opinion? Don't you see that now days everything is controversial, debatable, nothing is clear anymore in people's heads. Folks don't even know if they're a man or a woman in many cases, bi, straight, neither. Sure I'm not against giving gays rights, of course they're people too.Â
But what makes me sick is that's never enough, I see lawsuits about not enough gay material in books, not enough gay actors, complaints about churches not doing gay weddings, religious institutions looking down at them, etc. Words mom and dad are offensive now because a kid with 2 moms might be offended. Whats not freaking offensive anymore? Can we get rid of this word permanently from the dictionary please, along with political correctness.
 @commentator:Â
".... Because we need to draw the line somewhere ...."
Â
But who decides? It's completely arbitrary.
Â
And THAT is the problem.
How about those that believe in plural marriages, fight to get those recognized by our govt and then a military man can have 5 wives and 30 children covered. They then are eligible for housing/medical and since most military housing is no bigger than a 4 bedroom, they will be allowed to have 5 homes all on the military dime. Give an inch and they want a mile.
@Robinsnest I have served for 16 years and never ever met anyone with more than 6 kids. So I would have to say that you are stretching the truth...significantly. Secondly, I really don't care how many wives you have or want. As long as everyone is aware of the situation and agrees to that status quo then so be it. If you feel like Haveing 5 wives and potentially 5 divorces go a head. It's your dime.
@Robinsnest But we're not talking about plural marriages right now. We are talking about gay marriage which is LEGAL in this state and many others. As a veteran, I find it completely disrespectful and appalling that our military members and their families are not be cared for nor treated with the respect they deserve while fighting for our country.
Â
"Give an inch and they want a mile." Really??? All they are asking for is to be treated equally and fairly, as hetero couples are. Have you ever served in the military? Has your spouse, if you have one? Do you know how HARD it is to be away from your family? Do you know how HARD it is for the spouse left at home to take care of the family and the bills, all while worrying if you will ever see your loved on again? How about trying to handle all that responsibility while being denied the support and benefits that other military spouses are entitled to? How would that make you feel?
Â
Dammit KOMO, bring back the dislike button!!!
@Tattooed_Angel I was a military wife for 15 years so I'm more than aware of what military life is like. I think the bottom line is here that it will take time for this to get ironed out. I know it's hard for these people to wait, but these are really big changes that have taken place in the past year and there are bound to be wrinkles in the system as it catches up to where this is headed. In the meantime there needs to be more patience. If they look at where they were even 5 years ago they will see that changes are taking place if even slowly. To constantly place demands on the system is just irritating a lot of people even those who sympathise with them.
@Common Sense Why would I? At the time I was a military wife I was within the current laws of the federal government. Someday these women may be too. In the meantime your remark is a little bit juvenile and maybe we can discuss the issue when you grow up.
@DeadRabitz There is no reason to treat anyone disrespectfully. The bottom line here is that these women had to have known what the current law says and so this should come as no big surprise to them. There are still a lot of states and the federal government that do not recognize same sex marriage and the military has not been told they can do other than what the laws allow. Change takes time and it's always possible that there will be some states who will not change their laws, that has to be accepted too. It doesn't say why the chaplain asked these women to leave the function and it's always possible as is sometimes the case that maybe they were responsible in some way for being asked to leave. I'd like to hear both sides before I start screaming discrimination.
@Jatok however to remain silent would be worse. I tell my soldiers that I can't fix problems that I don't know about. Secondly they raise a significant question about why the chain of command isn't assisting their soldiers better. Thirdly they raise the issue of bigotry. The army chaplain who asked the couple to leave should have been put in his place. He does not have to marry the couple but he must treat them respectfully. He can not kick them out of a function.
@Jatok LOL, ok why don't you just go ahead and have over your dependent ID card. Oh and you won't need that TRICARE either will you. Why don't you just wander back in the kitchen and do something useful like make a sandwich.