School turnarounds prompt community backlash

LOS ANGELES (AP) - The federal government's push for drastic reforms at chronically low achieving schools has led to takeovers by charter operators, overhauls of staff and curriculum, and even school shutdowns across the country.
It's also generated a growing backlash among the mostly low-income, minority communities where some see the reforms as not only disruptive in struggling neighborhoods, but also as civil rights violations since turnaround efforts primarily affect black and Latino students.
"Our concern is that these reforms have further destabilized our communities," said Jitu Brown, education organizer of Chicago's Kenwood-Oakwood Community Organization. "It's clear there's a different set of rules for African-American and Latino children than for their white counterparts."
The U.S. Department of Education's civil rights office has opened investigations into 33 complaints from parents and community members, representing 29 school districts ranging from big city systems such as Chicago, Detroit and Washington D.C. to smaller cities including Wichita and Ambler, Penn., said spokesman Daren Briscoe. Two additional complaints are under evaluation, and more cities, including Los Angeles, are preparing their filings.
Last week, Secretary Arne Duncan fielded complaints at a public forum in Washington. The forum was attended by some 250 people who boarded buses, vans and planes from around the country to demand a moratorium on school closings and present a reform model that calls for more community input, among other items.
The recurrent theme is that communities are fed up with substandard education, but want solutions that will not create upheaval at the schools, which are often seen as pillars of stability in neighborhoods where social fabric is fragile.
Instead of focusing on dramatically changing the structure of a school, officials should invest in improving teaching, learning, equipment, and community engagement, which happens more often at schools in white, affluent neighborhoods, Brown said.
"But the response of the school district is to throw a grenade into our schools," Brown said.
Reformers say civil rights complaints are misguided because school failure disproportionately impacts minorities in the first place. Turnarounds are efforts to improve that, said Michael Petrilli, executive vice president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, an education think tank.
However, he noted that turnarounds are often a "Band-Aid solution. Most of the turnarounds aren't going to succeed because the school continues to exist in a dysfunctional school system. Radical change at the district may be what's needed."
Federal officials said they are open to working with communities to lessen the impact of turnarounds.
"On the ground, these policies can have an impact we don't see," Briscoe said. "But there's no promise that we'll be able to satisfy all people."
Overhauling the nation's 5,000 lowest-performing schools is a cornerstone of the Obama administration's education policy. To do that, the federal government revamped the existing School Improvement Grant program, boosting it from a $125 million annual initiative in 2007 to $535 million for the current school year.
Under the renewed program, which launched in 2010 with a onetime $3.5 billion infusion, districts receive grants to institute one of four school jumpstart models. They can turn the school over to a charter or other operator, replace at least half of the staff and principal, transform the school with a new principal and learning strategy, or simply close the school. Improvement schools can receive up to $2 million annually for three years.
Results have been mixed.
In Chicago, where the nation's third largest school system has undertaken one of the more extensive turnaround programs, a study of 36 schools by the University of Chicago found some improvement in academic achievement in elementary and middle schools but not until the second or third year of either a principal or staff replacement or a charter conversion.
"They're closing the gap but it's taking some time to do so," said Marisa de la Torre, who directed the study.
With high schools, researchers did not have academic data to parse, so instead looked at attendance rates, which are often a good indicator of performance, de la Torre said. Attendance rates improved in the first year of a turnaround, but then reverted to pre-turnaround rates. "We can't really say if the glass is half full or half empty," de la Torre said.
A study released last May found graduation rates and college-prep course participation increased dramatically at a Los Angeles high school in the Watts section taken over by charter Green Dot Public Schools in 2008. The National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing called the new Locke High School "an impressive success story in many ways," but noted overall achievement remains low.
To boost academic performance, Green Dot now plans to revamp its ninth-grade curriculum to offer more remedial help and open a middle school to better prepare kids for high school.
With no guarantee that turnarounds produce solid results quickly, some question whether drastic reform is worth the disruption, and whether less radical changes could work as well given adequate time and funding.
"We take issue with experimental reforms such as these when it is only children of color who are the subject of the experiment and especially when the experiment has already failed," wrote Jonathan Stith of Empower DC in his federal complaint about Washington D.C. schools.
Staff replacements have proven especially problematic at schools where teachers have to reapply for their jobs. Many don't reapply out of resentment and it's hard to find experienced teachers who want to work in an urban classroom.
A study by the National Education Policy Center found that in turnaround schools in Louisville, Ken., 40 percent of teachers were fresh out of college. Other reformed schools have had to start off with substitutes.
"Teachers are like their surrogate parents," said Christina Lewis, a special education teacher at Crenshaw High School in Los Angeles, where teachers will have to reapply for jobs in the fall when the school is converted to a magnet. "I'm so afraid that teachers who have put their hearts and souls into their jobs won't return next year. We just need stability and resources."
Experts also note that impoverished children often rely on schools for meals, positive role models, and mentors for personal issues, as well as education. Trust built with familiar faces in the school community gets severed by drastic reforms, said John Rogers, director at the University of California Los Angeles' Institute for Democracy, Education and Access.
Several students at Crenshaw High School in Los Angeles, where teachers must reapply for their jobs when the school is converted to a magnet program next fall, said it was disconcerting not to know who or what to expect.
"We have a lot of kids in foster care. Their lives are changing all the time," said Crenshaw student Anita Parker. "We have teachers who ask me if I need to talk. We have teachers who care about us."
The prospect of a civil rights complaint does not faze Los Angeles Unified Superintendent John Deasy, who has several high schools on his turnaround list. For Deasy, the real civil rights issue is that these schools have been allowed to fail for so long.
Crenshaw High School, the turnaround that is spurring community advocates to file the complaint, is the lowest performing school in the nation's second-largest system, a fact that Deasy called "immoral" at a recent school board meeting.
Just three percent of students are proficient in math and 17 percent in reading. Just 37 percent of students attend school 96 percent of the time. Just half of the class of 2012 graduated.
"Students aren't learning. Students aren't graduating," he said. "The purpose of this decision is to make sure Crenshaw gets dramatically and fundamentally better."
School board member Marguerite P. LaMotte, the board's only black member who represents the Crenshaw area, said she was angry that every effort to reform Crenshaw had gone nowhere and civil rights was about improving the school: "We have got to change something at Crenshaw for the better."
It's also generated a growing backlash among the mostly low-income, minority communities where some see the reforms as not only disruptive in struggling neighborhoods, but also as civil rights violations since turnaround efforts primarily affect black and Latino students.
"Our concern is that these reforms have further destabilized our communities," said Jitu Brown, education organizer of Chicago's Kenwood-Oakwood Community Organization. "It's clear there's a different set of rules for African-American and Latino children than for their white counterparts."
The U.S. Department of Education's civil rights office has opened investigations into 33 complaints from parents and community members, representing 29 school districts ranging from big city systems such as Chicago, Detroit and Washington D.C. to smaller cities including Wichita and Ambler, Penn., said spokesman Daren Briscoe. Two additional complaints are under evaluation, and more cities, including Los Angeles, are preparing their filings.
Last week, Secretary Arne Duncan fielded complaints at a public forum in Washington. The forum was attended by some 250 people who boarded buses, vans and planes from around the country to demand a moratorium on school closings and present a reform model that calls for more community input, among other items.
The recurrent theme is that communities are fed up with substandard education, but want solutions that will not create upheaval at the schools, which are often seen as pillars of stability in neighborhoods where social fabric is fragile.
Instead of focusing on dramatically changing the structure of a school, officials should invest in improving teaching, learning, equipment, and community engagement, which happens more often at schools in white, affluent neighborhoods, Brown said.
"But the response of the school district is to throw a grenade into our schools," Brown said.
Reformers say civil rights complaints are misguided because school failure disproportionately impacts minorities in the first place. Turnarounds are efforts to improve that, said Michael Petrilli, executive vice president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, an education think tank.
However, he noted that turnarounds are often a "Band-Aid solution. Most of the turnarounds aren't going to succeed because the school continues to exist in a dysfunctional school system. Radical change at the district may be what's needed."
Federal officials said they are open to working with communities to lessen the impact of turnarounds.
"On the ground, these policies can have an impact we don't see," Briscoe said. "But there's no promise that we'll be able to satisfy all people."
Overhauling the nation's 5,000 lowest-performing schools is a cornerstone of the Obama administration's education policy. To do that, the federal government revamped the existing School Improvement Grant program, boosting it from a $125 million annual initiative in 2007 to $535 million for the current school year.
Under the renewed program, which launched in 2010 with a onetime $3.5 billion infusion, districts receive grants to institute one of four school jumpstart models. They can turn the school over to a charter or other operator, replace at least half of the staff and principal, transform the school with a new principal and learning strategy, or simply close the school. Improvement schools can receive up to $2 million annually for three years.
Results have been mixed.
In Chicago, where the nation's third largest school system has undertaken one of the more extensive turnaround programs, a study of 36 schools by the University of Chicago found some improvement in academic achievement in elementary and middle schools but not until the second or third year of either a principal or staff replacement or a charter conversion.
"They're closing the gap but it's taking some time to do so," said Marisa de la Torre, who directed the study.
With high schools, researchers did not have academic data to parse, so instead looked at attendance rates, which are often a good indicator of performance, de la Torre said. Attendance rates improved in the first year of a turnaround, but then reverted to pre-turnaround rates. "We can't really say if the glass is half full or half empty," de la Torre said.
A study released last May found graduation rates and college-prep course participation increased dramatically at a Los Angeles high school in the Watts section taken over by charter Green Dot Public Schools in 2008. The National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing called the new Locke High School "an impressive success story in many ways," but noted overall achievement remains low.
To boost academic performance, Green Dot now plans to revamp its ninth-grade curriculum to offer more remedial help and open a middle school to better prepare kids for high school.
With no guarantee that turnarounds produce solid results quickly, some question whether drastic reform is worth the disruption, and whether less radical changes could work as well given adequate time and funding.
"We take issue with experimental reforms such as these when it is only children of color who are the subject of the experiment and especially when the experiment has already failed," wrote Jonathan Stith of Empower DC in his federal complaint about Washington D.C. schools.
Staff replacements have proven especially problematic at schools where teachers have to reapply for their jobs. Many don't reapply out of resentment and it's hard to find experienced teachers who want to work in an urban classroom.
A study by the National Education Policy Center found that in turnaround schools in Louisville, Ken., 40 percent of teachers were fresh out of college. Other reformed schools have had to start off with substitutes.
"Teachers are like their surrogate parents," said Christina Lewis, a special education teacher at Crenshaw High School in Los Angeles, where teachers will have to reapply for jobs in the fall when the school is converted to a magnet. "I'm so afraid that teachers who have put their hearts and souls into their jobs won't return next year. We just need stability and resources."
Experts also note that impoverished children often rely on schools for meals, positive role models, and mentors for personal issues, as well as education. Trust built with familiar faces in the school community gets severed by drastic reforms, said John Rogers, director at the University of California Los Angeles' Institute for Democracy, Education and Access.
Several students at Crenshaw High School in Los Angeles, where teachers must reapply for their jobs when the school is converted to a magnet program next fall, said it was disconcerting not to know who or what to expect.
"We have a lot of kids in foster care. Their lives are changing all the time," said Crenshaw student Anita Parker. "We have teachers who ask me if I need to talk. We have teachers who care about us."
The prospect of a civil rights complaint does not faze Los Angeles Unified Superintendent John Deasy, who has several high schools on his turnaround list. For Deasy, the real civil rights issue is that these schools have been allowed to fail for so long.
Crenshaw High School, the turnaround that is spurring community advocates to file the complaint, is the lowest performing school in the nation's second-largest system, a fact that Deasy called "immoral" at a recent school board meeting.
Just three percent of students are proficient in math and 17 percent in reading. Just 37 percent of students attend school 96 percent of the time. Just half of the class of 2012 graduated.
"Students aren't learning. Students aren't graduating," he said. "The purpose of this decision is to make sure Crenshaw gets dramatically and fundamentally better."
School board member Marguerite P. LaMotte, the board's only black member who represents the Crenshaw area, said she was angry that every effort to reform Crenshaw had gone nowhere and civil rights was about improving the school: "We have got to change something at Crenshaw for the better."
One cannot expect a school to do what parents fail to do.   Education begins in the home.   Schools are generally a reflection of the surrounding population. It must be very difficult to attract the top teachers to work in these schools.  And when the good teachers accept jobs in these schools how long do they last?  There is far more to this problem than political correctness will acknowledge.  The real tragedy is that many people who want a solid education for their children, are forced to live in depressed socio-econmic areas with poor schools. More power to these particular parents who are advocating for their children. These are the children who will succeed despite the odds while we look for solutions to our education system for the rest.
".... Students aren't learning. Students aren't graduating," he said. "The purpose of this decision is to make sure Crenshaw gets dramatically and fundamentally better ...."
Â
But what they fail to realize when they try to make such a huge drastic change in so short of a time, is that they are not going to succeed., and they are going to pi## off the parents.
Â
The kids did not suddenly wake up stupid one day during their sophmore year. This is years & years woirth of failure compounded. They need to start at BOTH ends. Work to improve the elementary school education of ALL their students. As they become stronger academically, that will work it's way up through the following grades. They also need to NOT totally gut a school & rebuild it from the ground up. They need to tak it apart, piece by piece. See what is working - replicate that. See what is not working - get rid of that.
Â
I am SO thankful my son has graduated. The passage of charter schools here in Washington is NOT a good thing. There will be a disctinct 2 layer system now, since charters will not be required to take any & all students, like public schools do. All that will happen is that the charter schools will take the cream off the top, and leave the harder to educate students in public schools in a greater proportion, which will make it harder for them to educate ALL the students.
 @LocalLady There already is a two tiered system. Those like myself who sacrifice everything else to PAY for our kids education (while simultaneosly being forced to pay for everyone elses) and everyone else who expects the government to pay for their kid's education. Personally I wouldn't waste a minute of my kid's time sending them to a government cesspool! I will wait to buy the fancy car, expensive vacations, gym memberships, going out to eat, movies, etc. and will invest that money for a few more years in my kid's education at a private school. The rest of you can trust your kids to the government!Â
There are two problems, and are so different in nature. Â 1) The parents in these schools need to look at themselves first. The kids are allowed to speak in unintelligible grunts at home, good work is rarely rewarded, and too many parents are MIA when it comes to actually parenting. Â The word on the street is that it's not cool to be good in school in those neighborhoods. Â A school is only as good as the parents. Â I tell people that when they obsess over one middle class suburb over another... the school is what you make it...
Â
UNLESS.... Â 2) School maintenance and funding is directly related to the income/property taxes in their District area. Â That means if you have the misfortune of being born in a poor area, your school will be most likely crumbing around you. They will not be able to pay for the best teacher, and frankly most teachers don't WANT to teach in inner city schools because once the kids hit 3rd grade they have attitude issues and problems at home. Add to that some of the worse parents, ever, and it's a disaster. Â Sadly, too many parents in these disadvantaged areas are so good at protesting, complaining, screaming about outrage, about these things.. but nary a peep when their own son shoots someone or their kid drops out, or cannot read. Â Â
Â
I think that ALL schools should have the same source of funding, and it should be equal. Period. I think that parenting classes and accountability should be required for people on public assistance (yes, I'm a liberal.) Â My mother was held accountable if I ditched school, and these kids should have the same. Â
This shouldn't be turned into a race issue. Not all low income households are black or hispanic. There are plenty of whites and every other race who fit into low income brackets. Our schools are simply failing the kids and there are far less parents actively engaged in their children's education than ever before. You can't fix this problem with more money because that's not the problem. These kids need parents to participate in their lives and make sure they are learning, not just complain because "someone else" is doing the wrong thing. At least we are at a point where the statistics are beginning to show the results of years of neglect and perhaps something will finally be done about the schools and education.
The headline of this article is factually incorrect.
Â
It should read "School *privatizations* prompt community backlash."
Â
The very text of the article uses these words to describe the "turnarounds" lauded in the headline:
Â
"Results have been mixed.... overall achievement remains low.... researchers did not have academic data to parse."
Â
Charter schools are the worst kind of scam.
 @Sutekh "Charter schools are the worst kind of scam"...besides public schools! Good Lord, can you honestly with a straight face say that public school are successful? What a joke! A scam is something that takes your money for 50+ years and continually fails generation after generation as the public school system in this country has again and again. Not a big fan of charter schools either, but anything has to be better than the status quo, especially in cesspools like D.C., Chicago, Baltimore and LA! I will continue to work two jobs and tons of overtime, and do whatever it takes to keep my kids from being guinea pigs in your public school nightmare!Â
@Sutekh Obviously doing nothing at this point isn't an option. The charter schools are having good results in most cases. If you want your child to have a mediocre education at a public school that is also a choice you have.
Great caption for the pic. I'm guessing those are all school employees.
Â
'Just three percent of students are proficient in math and 17 percent in reading. Just 37 percent of students attend school 96 percent of the time. Just half of the class of 2012 graduated'.
Â
Why would ANY parent object to trying to improve these numbers? 17% can read and half the class graduates?
How does that work?
I would have thought that black and Latino parents in poor neighborhoods with low-achieving schools would have been demanding whatever drastic reforms were necessary to provide their children with a good education and a future. Â I would have been wrong. Â
 @opus8no5:Â
They probably ARE making demands for better schools. But, they are not listened to.
Â
Look at Seattle Schools. There is a "Great Dividde" (basically the Ship Canal).
Â
Those in the South end are crumbling, falling apparent, poor attendence, lower achievement. The general population in the south end is minorities with lower incomes.
Â
Those in the North end are getting brand new buildings (while buildings crumble in the south end), they have better academic & atheletic programs, the parents are listened to when they complain. They are for the most part whie, middle to high income, many "stay at home" parents who can volunteer in their chilodren's classrooms.
Â
KOMO even recently had story about the deplorable conditions of the south end schools. But many went into the story & commented about how the money is NOT needed, that the schools should somehow "find" the money in their current budget. I agree that most school districts are top-heavy in administrators, but why should the students be the ones paying the price with dilapidated schools that are literally falling around their ears?
 @LocalLady Or all the people in the picture are probably union teachers who don't want anything to change except to pay them more money for the same horrible product? Who is going to pay for all these new schools? Already Seattle School District spends $19,000 per student? The prep school my kids go to only spend $9000 per student? Wow, $10,000 more and you get a drop out? Average pay for 10 months of work, paid holidays, two weeks off at Christmas, one week off at spring break...$70,850. Average administrator pay...$132,000. Superintedent pay...$234,000! 163 employees in the Seattle School District make over $100,000 a year. For some reason we are not falling for the "all we need is more money" routine! How about you find out what the private schools are doing and emulate it? Of course that would mean getting rid of the leech sucking unions.
 @Opus8no5 Please, tell us more about your theory that "black and Latino parents" hate their children.
Â
Or.... could it be that they know just a teensy bit more about this issue than you do? Because (and I know this is difficult to understand) they are actually living it, and not just lapping up pre-digested opinions about it from right-wing propaganda sources?
 @Sutekh You REALLY need to go and take that logic class I have been recommending. Did they not have logic or at least debate classes at the public school you went to? Where exactly did Opus say that the parents "hate their children"? You just begged the question here. You rerouted what Opus said and then added a logically fallacious ending on the end of it.Â