Texas inmate prepares for 3rd trip to death house

LIVINGSTON, Texas (AP) — What Cleve Foster remembers most about his recent brushes with death is the steel door, the last one condemned Texas inmates typically walk through before their execution.
"You can't take your eyes off that door," he says.
But twice over the past year and a half, Foster has come within moments of being escorted through the door, only to be told the U.S. Supreme Court had halted his scheduled punishment.
On Tuesday, Foster, 48, is scheduled for yet another trip to the death house for participating in the abduction and slaying of a 30-year-old Sudanese woman, Nyaneur Pal, a decade ago near Fort Worth.
It takes just under an hour to drive west from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Polunsky Unit, where the state's male death-row inmates are housed, to the Huntsville Unit, where condemned Texas prisoners have been put to death for nearly a century. The last 485 have been by lethal injection; the first 361, from 1924 through 1964, from the electric chair.
On execution day, the condemned inmate waits, usually for about four hours, in a tiny cell a few steps from the steel door to the death chamber.
Foster, a former Army recruiter known to his death row colleagues as "Sarge," denies his role in the murder. Prosecutors say DNA ties him to the killing and that he gave contradictory stories when questioned about Pal's death.
"I did not do it," he insisted recently from a tiny visiting cage outside death row.
Appeals again were pending in the courts, focusing on what his lawyers argued was poor legal help both at his 2004 trial in Fort Worth and by attorneys early in the appeals process. Similar appeals resulted in the three previous reprieves the courts subsequently have lifted, but his lawyers argue his case should get another look because the legal landscape has changed in death penalty cases.
"I don't want to sound vain, but I have confidence in my attorney and confidence in my God," he said. "I can win either way."
Pal's relatives haven't spoken publicly about their experiences of going to the prison to watch Foster die, only to be told the punishment has been delayed. An uncle previously on the witness list didn't return a phone call Friday from The Associated Press.
Foster, however, shared his thoughts of going through the mechanics of facing execution in Texas — and living to talk about it.
The process shifts into high gear at noon on the scheduled execution day when a four-hour-long visit with friends or relatives ends at the Polunsky Unit outside Livingston.
"That last visit, that's the only thing that bothers me," he said. "The 12 o'clock-hour hits. A dozen or so guards come to escort you."
By Foster's count, it's 111 steps to the prison gate and an area known as the box cage. That's where he's secured to a chair for electronic scrutiny to detect whether he has any metal objects hidden on his body.
It's the legacy of inmate Ponchai Wilkerson. Wilkerson, asked by the warden if he had a final statement after he was strapped to the death chamber gurney for execution in 2000, defiantly spit out a handcuff key he'd concealed in his mouth.
"You're in handcuffs, you're chained at the ankles, they give you cloth shoes and you have to shuffle to keep them on," he said.
As he waddles the 111 steps, he gets acknowledgement from fellow prisoners who tap on the glass of their cells.
At the prison gate, armed officers stand by as he's put in a van and secured to a seat for the roughly 45-mile trip to Huntsville that he says feels like a "90-mph drive." There are no side windows in the back of the van where Foster, accompanied by four officers, rides to the oldest prison in Texas. Only the back doors have windows.
"It's like stepping back in time, dungeons and dragons," he said of entering through two gates at the back of the Huntsville Unit, more commonly known as the Walls Unit because of its 20-foot-high red brick walls.
Prison officials then hustle him into the cell area adjacent to the death chamber.
"Going inside, it's a little spooky. You can tell it's been there a while," he said. "Everything's polished, but still it's real old. You look down the row. History just screams at you.
"It's almost like 'Hotel California,'" he said, referring to the song by The Eagles. "You can check out anytime, but you can't leave."
Both times he's been there, most recently last September, he's been treated "like a human being," Foster said. Officers look at him but don't smile, he said.
At one point, he saw someone walk by with a bulging envelope that he assumed contained the lethal injection drugs.
At 4 p.m., during his first trip to the death house in January 2011, he was served a final meal. He'd asked for several items, including chicken.
"It tasted so good," he said. "It actually had seasoning on it."
Two hours later, at the start of a six-hour window when his execution could be carried out, he received the Supreme Court reprieve.
Since then, inmates no longer get to make a final meal request. Procedures were changed after a state lawmaker complained that condemned inmates were taking advantage of the opportunity and that murder victims never get that chance.
Foster was looking forward to nachos and chicken, the same food served to other inmates the day last year that he made his second trip to the death house, but he never received it. Instead, his attorney tearfully brought him news of another Supreme Court reprieve just before dinner time.
He asked for a doggie bag but was refused. He was put back in the van and returned to death row.
"I've already told the chaplain: Take the phone off the hook before 4 o'clock," he said, anticipating his next trip Tuesday. "I want to get that last meal."
"You can't take your eyes off that door," he says.
But twice over the past year and a half, Foster has come within moments of being escorted through the door, only to be told the U.S. Supreme Court had halted his scheduled punishment.
On Tuesday, Foster, 48, is scheduled for yet another trip to the death house for participating in the abduction and slaying of a 30-year-old Sudanese woman, Nyaneur Pal, a decade ago near Fort Worth.
It takes just under an hour to drive west from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Polunsky Unit, where the state's male death-row inmates are housed, to the Huntsville Unit, where condemned Texas prisoners have been put to death for nearly a century. The last 485 have been by lethal injection; the first 361, from 1924 through 1964, from the electric chair.
On execution day, the condemned inmate waits, usually for about four hours, in a tiny cell a few steps from the steel door to the death chamber.
Foster, a former Army recruiter known to his death row colleagues as "Sarge," denies his role in the murder. Prosecutors say DNA ties him to the killing and that he gave contradictory stories when questioned about Pal's death.
"I did not do it," he insisted recently from a tiny visiting cage outside death row.
Appeals again were pending in the courts, focusing on what his lawyers argued was poor legal help both at his 2004 trial in Fort Worth and by attorneys early in the appeals process. Similar appeals resulted in the three previous reprieves the courts subsequently have lifted, but his lawyers argue his case should get another look because the legal landscape has changed in death penalty cases.
"I don't want to sound vain, but I have confidence in my attorney and confidence in my God," he said. "I can win either way."
Pal's relatives haven't spoken publicly about their experiences of going to the prison to watch Foster die, only to be told the punishment has been delayed. An uncle previously on the witness list didn't return a phone call Friday from The Associated Press.
Foster, however, shared his thoughts of going through the mechanics of facing execution in Texas — and living to talk about it.
The process shifts into high gear at noon on the scheduled execution day when a four-hour-long visit with friends or relatives ends at the Polunsky Unit outside Livingston.
"That last visit, that's the only thing that bothers me," he said. "The 12 o'clock-hour hits. A dozen or so guards come to escort you."
By Foster's count, it's 111 steps to the prison gate and an area known as the box cage. That's where he's secured to a chair for electronic scrutiny to detect whether he has any metal objects hidden on his body.
It's the legacy of inmate Ponchai Wilkerson. Wilkerson, asked by the warden if he had a final statement after he was strapped to the death chamber gurney for execution in 2000, defiantly spit out a handcuff key he'd concealed in his mouth.
"You're in handcuffs, you're chained at the ankles, they give you cloth shoes and you have to shuffle to keep them on," he said.
As he waddles the 111 steps, he gets acknowledgement from fellow prisoners who tap on the glass of their cells.
At the prison gate, armed officers stand by as he's put in a van and secured to a seat for the roughly 45-mile trip to Huntsville that he says feels like a "90-mph drive." There are no side windows in the back of the van where Foster, accompanied by four officers, rides to the oldest prison in Texas. Only the back doors have windows.
"It's like stepping back in time, dungeons and dragons," he said of entering through two gates at the back of the Huntsville Unit, more commonly known as the Walls Unit because of its 20-foot-high red brick walls.
Prison officials then hustle him into the cell area adjacent to the death chamber.
"Going inside, it's a little spooky. You can tell it's been there a while," he said. "Everything's polished, but still it's real old. You look down the row. History just screams at you.
"It's almost like 'Hotel California,'" he said, referring to the song by The Eagles. "You can check out anytime, but you can't leave."
Both times he's been there, most recently last September, he's been treated "like a human being," Foster said. Officers look at him but don't smile, he said.
At one point, he saw someone walk by with a bulging envelope that he assumed contained the lethal injection drugs.
At 4 p.m., during his first trip to the death house in January 2011, he was served a final meal. He'd asked for several items, including chicken.
"It tasted so good," he said. "It actually had seasoning on it."
Two hours later, at the start of a six-hour window when his execution could be carried out, he received the Supreme Court reprieve.
Since then, inmates no longer get to make a final meal request. Procedures were changed after a state lawmaker complained that condemned inmates were taking advantage of the opportunity and that murder victims never get that chance.
Foster was looking forward to nachos and chicken, the same food served to other inmates the day last year that he made his second trip to the death house, but he never received it. Instead, his attorney tearfully brought him news of another Supreme Court reprieve just before dinner time.
He asked for a doggie bag but was refused. He was put back in the van and returned to death row.
"I've already told the chaplain: Take the phone off the hook before 4 o'clock," he said, anticipating his next trip Tuesday. "I want to get that last meal."
That's Texas justice for you. Maybe when the DOJ gets done dealing with the SPD, they should check it out. It might be a bit pricey.
An appeals commission should be set up just for death sentence cases. All death sentences should be automatically appealed to this commission. It should be staffed by a team of legal experts with a full staff. There should be an investigative staff with full subpoena powers. Lab work submitted by this commission should be fast tracked through the best national laboratories. They should have an open ended budget for their investigations, with no time limits. Their findings should be the last word. If they find any reason for doubt, the sentence would automatically be commuted to life at which point this commission would be done with the case. If they found the accused innocent they should be retried using the new evidence. If they could not find any evidence which contradicted the findings of the trial court, execution should then take place within 72 hours. No other legal appeal would be allowed. No matter how much it cost to run this commission, it would be but a fraction of what is now spent. In addition, every death row inmate would have equal access to the best appeal team ever.     Â
Its really a shame that those who support the death penalty don't care about those who were innocent and placed on death row. Could you tell any of these people who were dubiously placed on death row that you are sorry that they were there? This is why we have the Innocence Project. They continue to free those who are indeed innocent, before they get a needle in their arm.
Â
RIP to those who were truly innocent and to those who served time on death row, I am truly shameful and sorry that you ended up there, please don't hold any animosity towards those who put you there, for they know what they did not.
 @yentaleh You lack a grip on cause and effect relationships. Being pro death penalty does exclude having compassion.
Â
If a person commits a grievous crime with three or more credible witnesses, then absolutely that person deserves a swift death penalty. The death penalty in mass murder cases with an obvious perpetrator is the most humane option for everyone involved.
Â
Requiring three or more witnesses takes care of the possibility of innocent people getting the death penalty.
 @Commenter87643 It has also been proven that eyewitness's disagree on just about everything.
 @Commenter87643 Does this mean that if I saw something that did not match what you saw, that would make one of us credible and the other not?
 @Commenter87643  @MC Who's to say though that you don't have a corrupt prosecutor Commenter87643. Corrupt police, and judicial system could raise hell if they so wanted. The 3 credible witness theory is good but in theory only. Given real life situations, this would never work either.
 @Commenter87643 Then what would make them CREDIBLE? so where do we look  for credible witnesses? a witness is a witness, so say if there are 3 out of six who agree on some things but not others, are they considered crediible? what makes a credible witness credible?
 @MC They wouldn't count as 3 credible witnesses then would they? If they can't agree.
 @Commenter87643 17 people have been freed from death row because they were innocent. 8 men have died because of malfeasance, so therefore in your words they don't deserve compassion, because they're just collateral damage.
 @yentaleh Yes, that is a sad deal, murder is murder, either way, even if the State says it's ok...I'm certainly not defending anyone who murders, however LEGAL STATE MURDER is not the answer either.
 @MC Yea I wish I knew, but it sounds like this inmate just wants it all to end. His last words in the story are apathetically poetic.
Â
"I've already told the chaplain: Take the phone off the hook before 4 o'clock," he said, anticipating his next trip Tuesday. "I want to get that last meal."
 @yentaleh Thank you, wow, makes you wonder if Texas is making some very  serious mistakes, as I said before, this is the 3rd. time going to the execution hold area for him, so I just wonder why he got 2 other stays? must be some reason.....
 @MC The 17 that were freed, 12 came from Texas, with the latest being Anthony Graves in 2010. With the 8 that have died, 6 out of the 8 who died, died in Texas.
 @yentaleh I said no such thing. Those 17 people that you cite WERE NOT sentenced under the 3 witness rule.
Â
Again, being FOR the death penalty does NOT rule out compassion. One does not exclude the other.
 @yentaleh Were these 17 people you speak of freed from the Texas prison? and the 8 who have died also from the Texas prison?
@yentaleh Lets hope the "third time is the charm".  Stick a needle in him, heâs done.
 @oldster70 <sigh> will his death make you sleep better at night? Where is your club? And how's that dragging your wife around by the hair working for you?
 @yentalehÂ
Another TD worthy comment...
So you prefere to disagree with someone without having to logically explain why.  Good to know. thanks for admitting that.
 @yentaleh How about this for civilized... seeing a person come up and beat someone to death right in front of you ... then threaten that if you talk they will do the same to you... are you telling me the person seeing that deserves to live in fear because it is uncivlized? ... gimmie a break and stuff that bleeding heart somewhere else... any person who commits murder or any violent crime should all have a date with their maker! I wonder how you feel if you were the person in that situation and then being told we cannot execute this person because we are to civilized!
 @T H I S  @LocalLady I see and thank you for the clarification.
 @LocalLady You do realize that you are comparing your cousin not being allowed into Canada to the US government killing potentially kiling an innocent man, right?Â
Â
 @yentaleh that was to @LocalLadyÂ
 @yentaleh:Â
So, if we are such a barbaric country, why bother commenting on our news, on our use of capital punishment? Why not just leave us to ourselves?
Â
I have NO sympathy for the Crown - some of the rules & laws they have are completely assinine & backwards - yet you call the US "barbaric".Â
Â
An example: my cousin, when she was younger, was a "wild child" nad has a conviction on her record. So, according to the laws, she is not allowed to travel to Canada unless she first writes a letter of appeal to the Queen, begging forgiveness & for permission to enter Canada. Her debt to socoiety, as imposed on her under US law, has been fulfiiled. She has led a clean & sober life for 30 years now. Why should she have to apologize to the Queen & beg forgiveness? It's completely stupid.
 @T H I S Who is this in reference to? Me? I will explain, I'm consider myself a civilized person and people in a civilized society don't kill because of misplaced revenge. Murder is murder, state sanctioned or not. This (amongst several other reasons) why the US is considered a barbarian country where the morals of hate rule the day.
 @LocalLady So to those who are truly innocent, you have no love, compassion, and/or kindness? Who really deserves the thumbs down?
 @oldster70 So what IF he truely IS innocent? there is a reason for the 2 stays already...could the word be DOUBT?
 @LocalLady  @yentaleh: I agree that, you have a right to your feelings and yes the statistics are low with regards to death row inmates, (17 people have been freed from death row because they were truly innocent.) However, how about the 8 men who were put to death and later on because of time and new and/or hidden evidence that was found showing that they were innocent? How do you think their families are feeling? What do you think they're going through? Their loved ones were murdered, systematically murdered. Will they have any closure and will the victim's family have any closure too? Probably not. Mistakes happen, poor police and prosecutions happen. Life without parole is far better than death, because then you don't have ANYONE who is innocent dying because of miscarriage of justice.
 @yentaleh:Â
VERY FEW as an overall percentage are truly innocent. For them, yes I have compassion - but I have absolutely NO compassion for those who are guilty. Too many claim they deserve compassion after showing NO compassion or mercy to their victims.
 @oldster70 I also do hope that by chance you run into someone who is innocent and spent time behind bars, but of course you wouldn't show any care or kindness because your heart is made of stone.
 @oldster70 I will see if I can find a box full of compassion for you.
I say eff their last meal. Murder victims usually don't get that privilage so why should the criminals get that option?
Executions don't deter violent crime, and it cost more to execute an inmate then to let them live in prison for the rest of their lives. Several states look at the cost of execution vs life in prison and the numbers of staggering (There are currently 3,000 people on death row and it costs from start to finish around 3 million dollars per inmate compared to those with life in prison where its a 1/4 of the cost.) I guess those in Texas are blessed to have the money to spend on executing convicts.
Â
Keep up the good work Texas. /s
Â
 Here are my sources:
Â
www.npr.org/templates/story.php?storyId=102570588
www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
 @yentaleh Why 'keep' then on death row? within 30 days of the death penalty sentence they should be executed. Simple. And no extra cost to house them. I guarantee you the crime rate will drop if people realize that you are dead within 30 days of a death sentence.
 @k_did Why kill them at all? Life behind bars w/out parole is worse than the death penalty. Why give them the easy way out? Knowing in 10-20 years that you maybe die, compared to knowing that you will be in prison until old age, disease, or by the hands of another inmate, is far worse in my opinion. (and in my uncle's opinion, he just got out of prison for a white collar crime. When he was in, he worked on death row in Connecticut before it was abolished earlier this year. He said the inmates never had it as good. Large cells, TV's, they even had their own yard. Now that the death penalty is gone in Connecticut those inmates are now in general population with life w/out parole several attempted suicide, and only one succeeded, says my uncle) Other countries have life sentences (Canada, UK, and all of Europe, Australia ect) Civilized countries, that don't see death as an option. Its about time the US did as well.
 @yentaleh  @k_did 60 Billion dollars a year and growing is the cost of U.S. inmates LWOP is only worse to those of us paying the bill! Prison nowadays is like a spa, good food, cable TV, computers and games req rooms and workout rooms; that is why so many don't care and in many cases want to go back. Make it the hell it is supposed to be and follow through on death penalties!
 @MC Six posts of mine ago, I wrote "The death penalty certain IS a deterrent to the convicted committing another crime. If you do not believe this, please cite references where there has been EVEN ONE CASE of a person committing another crime after their death!".
Â
So what part of that wasn't clear?
 @Commenter87643 Ok, if you had said that to begin with instead of saying "Name one case that a person comitted a crime AFTER THEIR DEATH" it makes perfect sense that persons like Dodd and others of his caliber CAN'T murder again, my point being "THE DEAD DO NOT MURDER"  weather it's Dodd, Bundy, or whoever,does that make any sense to you?Â
 @MC It makes NO sense that people like Westly Allan Dodd can never hurt anyone else? Tell that to his victims and their families.
 @Commenter87643 Oh, I saw your comments every time, and chose to ignore them, but after wasting so much space asking that same lame thing, I had to respond,  still makes NO sense.
 @MC Apparently not so juvenile that it didn't have to be repeated to you and yentaleh several times. And it's been my point all along. Death penalty is not to deter OTHER people from committing crimes, it is to deter a FAIRLY CONVICTED mass murderer from committing MORE crimes.
Â
 @Commenter87643 Your comment is lacking intellectual thought, you sir, are a joke.
 @Commenter87643 That remark is very juvenile, I'm reasonably sure anyone who can think standing up knows  "DEAD PEOPLE CAN NOT COMMIT A CRIME" your point being with a statement like that?
 @yentaleh  @LocalLady  @yentaleh: Name ONE CASE that a person committed a crime after their death. Your list of 8 names does NOT contain that information.
 @Commenter87643  @LocalLady  @yentaleh: scroll down I have a list of 8 names, Or better yet go here:
Â
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/executed-possibly-innocent
Â
You decide.
 @yentaleh  @LocalLady  @yentaleh: Your list does NOT show EVEN ONE CASE in which a person committed a crime after their death.
Â
I've only asked for ONE CASE.
 @Commenter87643  @LocalLady  @yentaleh: Look at the names that I have listed, go read their individual stories, then get back to me.
 @yentaleh  @LocalLady  @yentaleh: You have yet to show ONE case in which a person committed a crime after they were executed!
 @Commenter87643  @LocalLady  @yentaleh: If its such a deterrent, then why does the US have such a high murder rate? Canada, UK, and several other countries have much lower murder rates and these countries don't have a death penalty.
 @yentaleh  @LocalLady  @yentaleh: Your sentences are incomplete and often make no sense.
Â
One does not have to hate anyone to sentence them to death for terrible crimes.
Â
The death penalty certain IS a deterrent to the convicted committing another crime. If you do not believe this, please cite references where there has been EVEN ONE CASE of a person committing another crime after their death!
 @LocalLady  @yentaleh: I wouldn't care either way, I hope that I never meet you, for your hate is ilk.
 @yentaleh:Â
I truly wish this new commenting system had a TD function - this comment surely deserves it