U.S. Navy ship collides with oil tanker in Gulf
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — A U.S. Navy guided missile destroyer was left with a gaping hole on one side after it collided with an oil tanker early Sunday just outside the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
The collision left a breach about 10 feet by 10 feet (three by three meters) in the starboard side of USS Porter. No one was injured on either vessel, the U.S. Navy said in a statement.
The collision with the Panamanian-flagged and Japanese-owned bulk oil tanker M/V Otowasan happened about 1 a.m. local time. Photos released by the Navy showed workers standing amid twisted metal and other debris hanging down from the hole.
The cause of the incident is under investigation, the Navy said, though the collision was not "combat related." There were no reports of spills or leakages from either the USS Porter or the Otowasan, the Navy said.
Navy spokesman Greg Raelson said the destroyer now is in port in Jebel Ali, Dubai. "We're just happy there were no injuries," he said. "An investigation is under way."
The USS Porter is on a scheduled deployment to the U.S. 5th Fleet, which is based in Bahrain, an island nation in the Gulf, near Iran.
The Strait of Hormuz, at the mouth of the Gulf, is a crowded and tense waterway where one-fifth of the world's oil is routed. Tensions have risen there over repeated Iranian threats to block tanker traffic in retaliation for tighter sanctions by the West. The sanctions are aimed at persuading Iran to abandon its uranium enrichment program, so far without success.
Tensions in the Strait of Hormuz show no sign of abating.
The United States stoked the flames recently with an announcement that it will send U.S. Navy minesweepers and warships into the Gulf for exercises. The U.S. military maneuvers scheduled for September, to be joined by ships from about 20 American allies.
This is part of a Pentagon buildup in the Gulf with more troops and naval firepower, seeking to rattle Iran and reassure Saudi Arabia and Washington's other Gulf Arab partners worried about Iran's influence and power.
Iranian commanders and political leaders have stepped up threats and defiant statements in recent weeks over the Strait of Hormuz.
While it appears unlikely that Iran is ready to risk an almost certain military backlash by trying to close Hormuz — which is jointly controlled with Oman — the comments from Tehran show that Iranian authorities see the strait as perhaps their most valuable asset in brinkmanship over tightening sanctions.
Iranian officials have been quick to counter statements about closing the strait with observations that the situation is not likely to become that severe, indicating recognition that a step like closing the strait would have grave implications.
Warnings from Tehran in the past about possible closure have been enough to boost oil prices to offset the blow of sanctions. It's also among the potential flashpoints if military force is used against Iran over its nuclear program.
If attacked, Iran could severely disrupt oil supplies and send the shaky global economy stumbling backward again.
Three years ago, The USS Hartford, a nuclear-powered submarine based in Groton, Conn., collided in the strait with the USS New Orleans, a San Diego-based amphibious ship.
The New Orleans' fuel tank was ruptured, and 15 sailors on the Hartford suffered minor injuries. The collision caused $2.3 million in damage to the New Orleans, and the cost so far of repairs to the Hartford is $102.6 million.
The submarine's commanding officer was relieved of his duties, and the sub's chief of the boat, an adviser to the commanding officer, was reassigned. Several crew members were punished.
The collision left a breach about 10 feet by 10 feet (three by three meters) in the starboard side of USS Porter. No one was injured on either vessel, the U.S. Navy said in a statement.
The collision with the Panamanian-flagged and Japanese-owned bulk oil tanker M/V Otowasan happened about 1 a.m. local time. Photos released by the Navy showed workers standing amid twisted metal and other debris hanging down from the hole.
The cause of the incident is under investigation, the Navy said, though the collision was not "combat related." There were no reports of spills or leakages from either the USS Porter or the Otowasan, the Navy said.
Navy spokesman Greg Raelson said the destroyer now is in port in Jebel Ali, Dubai. "We're just happy there were no injuries," he said. "An investigation is under way."
The USS Porter is on a scheduled deployment to the U.S. 5th Fleet, which is based in Bahrain, an island nation in the Gulf, near Iran.
The Strait of Hormuz, at the mouth of the Gulf, is a crowded and tense waterway where one-fifth of the world's oil is routed. Tensions have risen there over repeated Iranian threats to block tanker traffic in retaliation for tighter sanctions by the West. The sanctions are aimed at persuading Iran to abandon its uranium enrichment program, so far without success.
Tensions in the Strait of Hormuz show no sign of abating.
The United States stoked the flames recently with an announcement that it will send U.S. Navy minesweepers and warships into the Gulf for exercises. The U.S. military maneuvers scheduled for September, to be joined by ships from about 20 American allies.
This is part of a Pentagon buildup in the Gulf with more troops and naval firepower, seeking to rattle Iran and reassure Saudi Arabia and Washington's other Gulf Arab partners worried about Iran's influence and power.
Iranian commanders and political leaders have stepped up threats and defiant statements in recent weeks over the Strait of Hormuz.
While it appears unlikely that Iran is ready to risk an almost certain military backlash by trying to close Hormuz — which is jointly controlled with Oman — the comments from Tehran show that Iranian authorities see the strait as perhaps their most valuable asset in brinkmanship over tightening sanctions.
Iranian officials have been quick to counter statements about closing the strait with observations that the situation is not likely to become that severe, indicating recognition that a step like closing the strait would have grave implications.
Warnings from Tehran in the past about possible closure have been enough to boost oil prices to offset the blow of sanctions. It's also among the potential flashpoints if military force is used against Iran over its nuclear program.
If attacked, Iran could severely disrupt oil supplies and send the shaky global economy stumbling backward again.
Three years ago, The USS Hartford, a nuclear-powered submarine based in Groton, Conn., collided in the strait with the USS New Orleans, a San Diego-based amphibious ship.
The New Orleans' fuel tank was ruptured, and 15 sailors on the Hartford suffered minor injuries. The collision caused $2.3 million in damage to the New Orleans, and the cost so far of repairs to the Hartford is $102.6 million.
The submarine's commanding officer was relieved of his duties, and the sub's chief of the boat, an adviser to the commanding officer, was reassigned. Several crew members were punished.
After hours of searching, I've come to the conclusion that the tanker does not exist (under that name). Someone please prove me wrong.
Â
It just seems odd to me that no one on the vessel has a camera, and we have pics of the destruction to one vessel and not the other.
Â
Weird eh?
So they are saying that somehow the command crew did not see the Otowasan. I really feel bad for all the crew who WERE ACTUALLY doing their damn jobs, because just being there is a stigma against them in our all-volunteer services. What I'd like to know is how long they are going to leave our Top Secret warship sitting in enemy territory. This smacks of the KC-130 incident where we just left the plane in enemy hands long enough for them to dissect it. If they are towing it straight away--to take it out and destroy it if nothing else, within 3-4 days, I'll eat my words gratefully. Somehow, I doubt I'll be eating words anytime soon. Just wouldn't fit the profile of what's been happening.
Oh no, better get Maaco!
I thought it was now US policy, after the USS Cole incident, to fire on other boats that got too close without authorization. (being sarcastic). My point is, if an oil tanker can ram one of our war ships, then how hard would it be for a speed boat full of explosives?
Oh come on guys! How hard can it be to pilot a ship?
 @stonetrails A lot harder than you think it is. Boats aren't cars. They can't stop or turn rapidly, especially an oil tanker. Just like a train, it takes time to stop a boat, and unlike a train on a track, it takes time to turn and maneuver.
Imagine it's 1 a.m.on a moonless night, a nice sea breeze as your ship slices smoothly thru the water.  The air is a balmy 77 degrees and the seas are calm and you're working topside on deck there. You're feeling pretty good when suddenly you hear the collision alarm followed by the collision. Then you remember the sharks you saw in the water earlier that day astern the ship and the silvery barracudas with the razor sharp teeth in the light of a battle lantern shining down in to the water just about dusk and darken ship. You hear the deafening screech and feel the 1000 foot long freighters crushing blow and you go sailing thru the air grabbing at everyhting and anything to keep from going over the side. Will anyone see you go in or hear your cry for help or your whistle? You're wearing your Mae West and it doesn't matter just yet because you hit the rail and bounce off it and over the side. You're still grabbing at things and you get a good hold of that rail as time stands still and you hear nothing but complete silence. You are outside your body looking down and see yourself briefly. You catch that rail now at the last possible moment and hold on for dear life with a death grip. You didn't know you were that strong. Now you need to haul yourself back aboard as you're dangling off the side of the ship. You don't want to go in the water for fear of being keel hauled or run over. Or sucked down. Or.... You think to yourself that the water should be warm. No time to think of all that just haul back aboard. You make it and see no one else has gone in. You don't see or hear anyone, so you call out. No answer. You go forward to see what you can do to help and then...
 You...you...you ..
Â
Reminds me of a crappy Tom Robbins novel.
Heads will roll on this one ......... all those men on watch with all their navigation gear and a billion dollar ship and they can't see where they are going. God help us. They are making a joke of our navy.
Then go sign up and show em how it's done. A billion dollar ship of our naval variety is pretty damn spry, and the people and gear are indeed the best on the planet. But it will NOT turn on a dime, nor can it overcome it's own massive inertia to haul back in reverse on demand. If ANYONE on here has been to the Strait, they know that the description 'crowded and tense' just doesn't always cover what happens there. While this ship appears to be critically or terminally damaged across the beam; and while the command crew and some others are likely screwed, this could indeed have been much worse.  Myself; I'm thankful that my family member that is attached to a guided missile frigate was not there. I'll wait for the rest.
Aren't you geniuses over there to PROTECT the oil tankers, not sail into them??
 @Jeff LOL! :) Excellent Comment.
Well... Get on the ball ABC and KOMO.
No-one has yet to paste a current pic of the damage to the Otowasan.
 @SG1 Probably is none. It's like a mini-cooper being hit by an F350. Might have just scratched his bow.
Even on my little boat we have this wonderful new invention called "radar". You can set it up, so that if anything comes within a certain distance, an audible alarm sounds. It isn't super expensive - probably less than the NAVY pays for a toilet seat. It works in fog, at night - anytime! You can even see a shape on your handy-dandy screen that looks a little like a boat coming towards you. There's also a cool thing called "AIS". All big ships have it, and it not only identifies the ship, but also its speed, course, destination. Maybe the Pentagon will invest in these neat inventions, to avoid these costly taxpayer funded collisions...Or, start telling the truth! Nah!
Liberalism is taking over the military. Â 10 x10ft? Â What a lie!! Â The defect is considerably larger. Â Look at the official consumer price index--- Â Cenus Bureau at it's best!! Â ... lie about CPI. Â Why, Â they take out food and energy prices.
Â
My oh My!! Get out the mustard and catsup!! Â Let's play ball with these incompetent idiots.Â
Maybe you should look at how tall the people are standing next to the breach before making a moronic comment. Learn to read key words. Breach does not mean the whole side of the ship.
"The United States stoked the flames recently..."
And the liberal comes out in this AP reporter. Promising and acting to keep free trade flowing through the strait is NOT stoking the flames. Iran has repeatedly and openly threatened to choke it off. We are simply enforcing international law.
Incompetency. No other possibility.
 @Klondiko Or someone REALLY wanted to get sent home soon...
Google seems flooded with the Navy vessels pics... But I cant locate anything other than undamaged photos of the Japan ship.  Censorship?  Make my curiosity perk! I would imagine the tanker was smunched pretty good too.
Imagine that.
Â
An empty tanker could not have caused that damage. It rides to high in the water. Only a fully laden vessel could have done this. So we have three choices.
Â
The Destroyer turned into the path of the tanker (this is not a glancing blow).
The tanker rammed the destroyer.
Or there is something the media doesn't doesn't want us to know.
Â
You pick.
 @bobalouie I agree. Ships don't just t-bone each other. This was a slow moving, but deliberate ramming from the looks of it. Probably trying to run the blockade after being warned to stop. Is an oil tanker big enough to carry weapons or uranium into Iran?
 @bobalouie remember the govt owns the media if they don't want you to know, you never will.
I'd like to see a photo of the tanker.
Need body work...
Â
Call 1-800- STOOPID (786-6743)
Ehh, that will buff out. Absolutely, some cutting compound, some wax, definitely can get the security deposit back.
 @Howard Beale hope they bought the insurance most reject that and later get into trouble with their rentals.
That was a bad time for the navigator to be playing World of Warcraft.
I'm not buying it. That's not a 'collides with tanker' accident. That's a tanker broadside accident.
Â
How does a 500' Aegis Destroyer get in front of an oil tanker?
Â
This stinks.
Â
Â
 @bobalouie I'm resistant to speculation, but I have to agree. As you noted, this isn't a destroyer collided with tanker, this is tanker broadsided destroyer. If this does have the AGEIS system on it this is a pretty WTF incident.
Â
Given all the tension in the region, I doubt we'll ever know the REAL story. Here is another thing to make you go hmmm -- where are the pictures of the damage to the oil tanker.
 @Howard Beale Not a chance in hell a tanker could sneak up on a destroyer. You couldn't get two guys in a row boat close to it let alone something the size of a tanker. These destroyers are being watched from far above and everything else.
Â
Â
@MikeCoomer It onlye takes a few minutes of inattentiveness for something like this to happen, especially in a crowded location like the Straits. I know when I went through on USS Ronald Reagan, we entered the straits at night, rigged for dark and quiet running.
 @Howard Beale  @greenecho Sorry fellas, but accidents do happen and have happened before. The ocean is a different place at night and if you're not constantly alert in a crowded shipping lane accidents can, and do, happen. Google USS Ingersoll. We were in Singapore when they struck a tanker in the Malacca Straits, also at night. I believe it hit sick bay and 2 or 3 folks were killed. Accidents happen. Don't blow this out of proportion.
Â
Mike
 @greenecho I guess I'll speculate a little further.
Â
Was the destroyer in a collision? No question.
Â
Was the destroyer rammed versus it ramming something? Sure looks that way.
Â
Do I think it was an oil tanker? Not a freakin' chance in Hell.
I agree Howard. Given the size of the average tanker (can't find this one on google), I'd say that was a love tap. This one had to be fully loaded, and the destroyer was WAY outta line. How fast does a loaded tanker go in the straights?
Â
I say agin, This stinks.Â
And the price of gas in Seattle goes up.
 @beakyboy remember ONE oil refinery is all we have in America so when it goes down ALL GAS goes up....lol WTF
with all of mother amerikas technology, how does this still happen? Pathetic!
Hopefully the captain of the naval vessel knows how much a Slurpee costs because he is going to be selling those along with a hot dog with chili, cheese and onions. The US Navy is quite shy about assigning 100's of sailors and a multi-million dollar piece of equipment to anyone who can't find there way around in the dark.
 @MedicalEquipMan Really? Tell us about the fire on the USS Miami. Some things are about who you know, politically. That aside, accidents happen and repairs to these ships cost millions. That is why cutting the defense budget is a serious concern.
Whoever was at the helm of the USS Porter at the time should be practicing the phrase "would you like fries with that?".
 @Mountainguy The helmsman probably doesn't have anything to worry about.  It's the OOD, the Conning Officer and the CO who need to be worried.
I thought the kamikaze's ways were all but done with then this happens.
 the chief on that Navy ship  dont want him borrowing my car !
 @armchairquaterback Probably about 25 - 30 chiefs on that ship.
Well that makes my, "honey don't be mad but I was in a fender bender," look a lot better.
Looks like it should buff right out.Â
Looks like a simple passageway to me. A compartment on the other side with a hatch bent inwards and the same above. Stretchers like these are found in passageways here and there about the ship. Should be a quick fix. It does look a bit ugly though.Â
Those stretchers are 6 feet long and so this gaping hole is much bigger than 10 feet by 10 feet. And they are pumpig water out using 250 gpm pumps no doubt. Seems like a lot of damage to me. That port does not have a dry dock either. At least It hadn't when my grandnephew sailed thru the straights recently. Those damage control guys must have done a heck of a job there he said. I just go off the phone with him. In the big scheme of things the damage is minimal as that ship is shored up most likely and can sail on easily in those waters with nary a problem. Seems like they were in one of the two lanes there and the tanker veered off course into the ship. Sometimes the computer controlls go wacky and blinky and then there are big problems. Judging by the damage the vessells were going very slow. I imagine the collision alarm went off just before contact and the crew immediately closed all the required hatches and fittings.  Â
 @Granny_MAC Will probably be repaired in Bahrain like the New Orleans was a few years ago with a similar collision.