U.S. Senate candidate keeping low profile after rape remarks

ST. LOUIS (AP) - Missouri Congressman Todd Akin, a conservative Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate, is keeping a low profile after a television interview in which he said that women's bodies can prevent pregnancies in "a legitimate rape" and that conception is rare in such cases.
Akin, a six-term congressman running against incumbent Democrat Sen. Claire McCaskill, was asked in an interview broadcast Sunday on St. Louis television station KTVI if he would support abortions for women who have been raped.
"It seems to me first of all, from what I understand from doctors, that's really rare," Akin said. "If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," Akin said of a rape victim's chances of becoming pregnant.
Akin said in an emailed statement later Sunday that he "misspoke" during the interview, though the statement did not specify on which points or comments.
"In reviewing my off-the-cuff remarks, it's clear that I misspoke in this interview and it does not reflect the deep empathy I hold for the thousands of women who are raped and abused every year," Akin's statement said.
Akin also said in the statement he believes "deeply in the protection of all life and I do not believe that harming another innocent victim is the right course of action."
Akin campaign spokesman Ryan Hite says Akin has no public appearances planned for Monday. He was scheduled to speak on KMOX Radio to talk show host Charlie Brennan Monday morning but canceled that appearance.
Akin's comments brought a swift rebuke from the campaign of presumptive GOP presidential candidate Romney.
"Gov. Romney and Congressman (Paul) Ryan disagree with Mr. Akin's statement, and a Romney-Ryan administration would not oppose abortion in instances of rape," Romney spokeswoman Amanda Henneberg said.
McCaskill, who is seeking a second term, in an emailed statement Sunday called the comments "offensive."
"It is beyond comprehension that someone can be so ignorant about the emotional and physical trauma brought on by rape," McCaskill said. "The ideas that Todd Akin has expressed about the serious crime of rape and the impact on its victims are offensive."
This month, Akin won the state's Republican U.S. Senate primary by a comfortable margin. During the primary, Akin enhanced his standing with TV ads in which former Arkansas governor and presidential candidate Mike Huckabee praised him as "a courageous conservative" and "a Bible-based Christian" who "supports traditional marriage" and "defends the unborn."
Akin, a former state lawmaker who first won election to the U.S. House in 2000, also has a long-established base among evangelical Christians and was endorsed in the primary by more than 100 pastors.
Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization for Women, on Sunday called Akin's remarks "flat-out astonishing."
"That kind of rhetoric re-traumatizes sexual assault victims. ... That kind of talk, I believe, is intended to shame women," she told AP Radio. The left-leaning organization supports abortion rights and already opposed Akin's candidacy before his comments Sunday.
Akin was interviewed on KTVI's "The Jaco Report," and also talked about numerous campaign issues, such as voter ID laws, the economy and Medicare. KTVI said the interview was conducted earlier in the week.
Akin, a six-term congressman running against incumbent Democrat Sen. Claire McCaskill, was asked in an interview broadcast Sunday on St. Louis television station KTVI if he would support abortions for women who have been raped.
"It seems to me first of all, from what I understand from doctors, that's really rare," Akin said. "If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," Akin said of a rape victim's chances of becoming pregnant.
Akin said in an emailed statement later Sunday that he "misspoke" during the interview, though the statement did not specify on which points or comments.
"In reviewing my off-the-cuff remarks, it's clear that I misspoke in this interview and it does not reflect the deep empathy I hold for the thousands of women who are raped and abused every year," Akin's statement said.
Akin also said in the statement he believes "deeply in the protection of all life and I do not believe that harming another innocent victim is the right course of action."
Akin campaign spokesman Ryan Hite says Akin has no public appearances planned for Monday. He was scheduled to speak on KMOX Radio to talk show host Charlie Brennan Monday morning but canceled that appearance.
Akin's comments brought a swift rebuke from the campaign of presumptive GOP presidential candidate Romney.
"Gov. Romney and Congressman (Paul) Ryan disagree with Mr. Akin's statement, and a Romney-Ryan administration would not oppose abortion in instances of rape," Romney spokeswoman Amanda Henneberg said.
McCaskill, who is seeking a second term, in an emailed statement Sunday called the comments "offensive."
"It is beyond comprehension that someone can be so ignorant about the emotional and physical trauma brought on by rape," McCaskill said. "The ideas that Todd Akin has expressed about the serious crime of rape and the impact on its victims are offensive."
This month, Akin won the state's Republican U.S. Senate primary by a comfortable margin. During the primary, Akin enhanced his standing with TV ads in which former Arkansas governor and presidential candidate Mike Huckabee praised him as "a courageous conservative" and "a Bible-based Christian" who "supports traditional marriage" and "defends the unborn."
Akin, a former state lawmaker who first won election to the U.S. House in 2000, also has a long-established base among evangelical Christians and was endorsed in the primary by more than 100 pastors.
Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization for Women, on Sunday called Akin's remarks "flat-out astonishing."
"That kind of rhetoric re-traumatizes sexual assault victims. ... That kind of talk, I believe, is intended to shame women," she told AP Radio. The left-leaning organization supports abortion rights and already opposed Akin's candidacy before his comments Sunday.
Akin was interviewed on KTVI's "The Jaco Report," and also talked about numerous campaign issues, such as voter ID laws, the economy and Medicare. KTVI said the interview was conducted earlier in the week.
Low Profile ?? Just resign already, what a disgraceful and plainly stupid thing to say.
Oh come on people!I think there is clearly a strong possibility he was trying to say "If it's legitimately a rape..." not "If it's a legitimate rape..." Give him a break! I know his remarks about the body rejecting rape pregnancies is questionable at best, but give him the benefit of the doubt -- he knows full well there is no "legitimate rape."
 @A Believer Your comment makes absolutely no sense. There is no difference between "If it's legitimately a rape..." and "If it's a legitimate rape..."
 @alaska_dreamin The difference between a "legitimate rape" and "legitimately a rape" is this: "Legitimately a rape" would mean a rape that is not just a fabrication or false-accusation. A "legitimate rape" can mean either the same "a rape that is not just a fabrication or false-accusation" or it could also mean "a rape that is "acceptable or approved-of." CLEARLY he meant the former and not the latter. I believe this was just a mis-statement. There is a difference.It is the same difference in meaning between a "legitimate child" and "legitimately a child" in the English language.
 @A Believer "Why not make aborting 48 year olds a "choice" too then?"
Well, that was quick...you have regressed to the same dismal level of those who equate being gay with child molesters/bestiality. At your deepest heart, you KNOW that you have lost the argument - you simply don't want to see that truth - because it places your entire view of life at jeopardy.
Go back into the swamp and consider your navel. If that's the best you have to offer the world, work to excel at it.
 @alaska_dreamin We REALLY need a multiple like button...no one could have stated it better than you did so eloquently here.
I've known women who were abused - hell, let's call it what it was, RAPED - as children...they all carry these memories.
And, when the right wing crows about it's "charities", they somehow never bother to mention actually HELPING children recover from - or even avoid - such situations...because, to them, such children do not exist, or at worse are simply aberrations. To help them would be to admit they exist, and that would rip their concept of "family" to shreds...
And THAT would endanger their entire Brady Family view of the world.
 @A Believer No, that is not what he is said. What he said was, "If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down." Sounds to me like he was saying that if you are pregnant as a result of rape, it couldn't have possibly been rape because your body would have prevented the pregnancy. Like I said, ignorant and offensive.
 @OrcasThunder You will never convince @A Believer that a woman should have the right to choose, even in cases of rape, because he/she has no idea what it is like to be violated in the most intimate way possible and then find out that you are carrying the seed of the monster who violated you.
Â
You hear people say that they feel violated after someone has robbed their home, I can assure anyone that that is nothing compared to the violation someone feels after they have been raped. In my opinion only a monster would force a woman who has been brutalized in such a traumatic way to carry the child of her attacker.Â
 @OrcasThunder Yes, I do know what a 2 or 3 week gestational age fetus looks like. I also know that 49% of all abortions are done after 9 weeks, and all the way up to around 25 weeks. I guess you don't know what a 14 week old "fetus" looks like. So, 9 months discomfort is worth killing babies over then huh? A "choice" as you put it. Why not make aborting 48 year olds a "choice" too then? Seems some are making that "choice" based on flawed beliefs, too.
 @A Believer You seem to have a massive misunderstanding of what a 2 or 3 week old fetus looks like.
And your dismissive concept of that "9 months" tells me that you must be male...the woman's body is NOT a vessel for the man's convenience. Or God's either, for that matter.
 @OrcasThunder 9 month "sentence" to care for a baby the way her body was designed to do,. Or taking a long drill and drilling a hole through the brain of a baby then clipping off his arms, head, and legs so they can rip it out of her... let's see... what to choose, what to choose... which do you think is right to do?
 @A Believer "She has the option to give it up for adoption."
Sooo...she only gets a 9 month sentence...how nice...
 @OrcasThunder Not to the unborn baby either! Like I said, rape isn't an excuse for aborting a life. The baby is no more at fault for the raping as the mother is, and therefor he/she shouldn't be killed in vengeance because the mother can't control her feelings about being raped. She has the option to give it up for adoption.
 @A Believer Not to the individual rape victim.
You are like Sarah Palin - you would require a rape victim to pay for the rape kit - to prove she was raped...
 @alaska_dreamin No. I guess I'll have to explain it to you... he was saying that because over 95% of "real, not fabricated" rape victims don't actually become pregnant, that the whole "we must have abortion for all those raped pregnant mothers out there" is less valid than they promote.
 @A Believer So, by your explanation, he meant to say that that most women who get pregnant from rape must be making a false accusation. Yep, even if he meant to state it the way you think he did, his comment is still ignorant and offensive at best.
Also, rape is no reason to give a baby the death penalty, regardless of what the mother feels.
 @A Believer Do you feel the same about the woman taking measures PRIOR to the rape to prevent pregnancy - like birth control?
 @A Believer Hey, you guys quote the bible...
What's the difference?
 @OrcasThunder So, you're quoting a left-wing liberal activist website and a devout satire news site as evidence against Christian contraception beliefs? LOL!
 @A Believer "Birth control is acceptable to most non-Catholic Christians"
Â
Really?
Â
http://www.jewsonfirst.org/contraceptives.html
http://www.rajbits.com/pforh/index.php?id=55&option=com_content&task=view
Â
Of course, there may be hope...
http://www.newsmutiny.com/pages/ChristianBirthControl.html
 @OrcasThunder Birth control is acceptable to most non-Catholic Christians if it is a form that does not kill a fetus (IE: Birth control pills or condoms, etc.) The "plan-B" or RU486 pills are still not approved because they actually cause a very early abortion of a planted fetus in its earliest stage.
What the Congressman said IS offensive. Thats a fact. But Obama's response is offensive and hypocritical, when you figure he supports abortion for ANY reason, even as a form of BIRTH CONTROL.
Â
No problems. If you have sex, and decide you dont want to be pregnant? No problem. Just butcher it. Denying the right for a women to have an abortion in case of rape, is just as bad as a woman deciding to KILL her baby, just because it is an inconvenience, or it would interfere with the lifestyle that got her in this situation in the first place.
Â
Â
 @Nuclearian Wow, I had to figure that one of you guys would finally take a break from being all bent over your work bench industriously wiring that pipe bomb together. Of course, maybe you just got back from the Post Office.Â
 @kennewickman So sorry. I am not a democrat.
 @Nuclearian Hey, time for you to listen up there Mr. Morality Policeman, there would not be a soul on here who would have mistaken you for a Democrat. Your Republican message comes through loud and clear.
Your remark about these women's life styles getting them into that situation to begin with is offensive. Sounds to me like you have a very low opinion of all women. Not all situations are black and white and this is no different.
 @Jatok Not at all. Just the women that seem to get pregnant and then think "oh, just get an abortion".
 @A Believer In other words, you can't back up your statements with facts so you are running away, that is a sound strategy.
 @A Believer Yep a true conservative, when you can't find real facts to back up your statement you fall back on God. Newsflash, we do not live in a theocracy.
 @A Believer  @alaska_dreamin No...just don't see the value in waiting for loony-tunes...
 @OrcasThunder  @alaska_dreamin  @Nuclearian I'm now "unfollowing" this thread, so don't expect any further responses on this issue.
Â
I know where God stands on it, and that's all that is important, and I'll die to defend that principle if I must. Will you all be willing to die for your pro-abortion convictions? Ask yourself that.
 @OrcasThunder Yes. Reliable.
Â
I'm using your (liberal) resource to prove a conservative point. If you are calling the Guttmacher Institute unreliable, then you are questioning all pro-abortion statistics, which bolsters my case even more. (Guttmacher Institute has always had a pro-abortion stance.)
Â
So, your choices are to agree with my verified stats which support my arguments that abortion should be stopped, or argue against your own research agency's stats that prove all your stats may be wrong.
Â
Either way, NO ONE really has a right to kill babies â regardless of the U.S. laws. God's laws supersede any human laws.
 @A Believer  @alaska_dreamin  @NuclearianÂ
So what? It is STILL the woman's right!
 @A Believer "reliable"?
Â
"Pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute produces bogus abortion statistics"
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/proabortion_guttmacher_institute_produces_bogus_abortion_statistics/
 @OrcasThunder  @alaska_dreamin Long enough to reveal your impatience I guess.
 @alaska_dreamin  @A Believer "Citation?"
How long do you want to wait?
 @alaska_dreamin Guttmacher Institute Periodical: Family Planning Perspectives, Vol. 20, No.4 P. 170. And, about 8,000+ others if you Google "93% of all abortions". The stat is reliable.
 @A Believer Citation?
 @alaska_dreamin  @Nuclearian 93% of all abortions are being done for birth control.
 @Nuclearian Wow, you think that all women who have an abortion think "oh, just get an abortion" and you think I am a moron. Just because you have seen women who use it as a form of birth control does not mean that all women who have abortions use it as birth control. My assessment of your intelligence remains unchanged.
 @OrcasThunder  @A BelieverÂ
Its NOT forcing a belief. Its the babies RIGHT to life. Constitutional right to LIFE. But I guess "liberals" obviously do not believe in constitutional rights, unless it is in support of women wanting to slaughter their children, which the Constitution does NOT allow.
 @alaska_dreamin And you are a moron if you think all women dont. I have seen women who used abortion as their birth control.
 @A Believer
"Clearly your beef is with ALL Christians"
Hardly. How could I, since several of my family and friends are good Christians who practice the Word as it should be? No, my "beef" is with those who wear the suit, but don't walk the mile.
Â
"quit trying to blame all the world's problems on me"
Thou doth take on a bit too much of "I am godly" there...where did you get the impression that I blame YOU for all the world's ills? Obviously you are not responsible for anything.
 @OrcasThunder Clearly your beef is with ALL Christians and not just me. Since you don't know what, in fact, I do for the needy, I'd stick to personal-level remarks and quit trying to blame all the world's problems on me. To have quality of life, you must first have life. Your arguments seem to always center around excuses for why everyone should be allowed to kill any baby they like, simply because it "might" not have the perfect life. You'll have to come up with something better than that for me to respond to you any further.
 @A Believer "Answer to question #4: Teaching children about contraception is a no brainer, but should only be done by parents"
And apparently the good religious Christian families are doing a bang up job in avoiding that responsibilities - thinking that "virginity contracts" are sufficient.
Maybe not...
"among the major religious groups, evangelical virgins are the least likely to anticipate that sex will be pleasurable, and the most likely to believe that having sex will cause their partners to lose respect for them. (Jews most often cite pleasure as a reason to have sex, and say that an unplanned pregnancy would be an embarrassment.) But, according to Add Health data, evangelical teen-agers are more sexually active than Mormons, mainline Protestants, and Jews."
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/11/03/081103fa_fact_talbot
 @A Believer "Answer to question #2: Yes, a living child will always get enough from the government, church, other charities, or individuals to support life."
BULL!
The right wing has been actively fighting this for decades! Look at the efforts to reduce aid to children, free or low cost breakfast and lunch meals for underprivileged kids in schools. They want to cut food stamp programs and low cost or free medical care for families with kids. They do not want government aid going to food banks.
Â
"to support life."
What you seem to miss in this is that simply being "alive" is NOT helping the kids to have a life that goes beyond the poverty and low esteem and poor success rates of the kids who grow up in poverty face every day...you seem to think that, as long as you provide "charity" you are "supporting" them. Remember the words "Whatsoever you do onto them, you do onto me..."? Well, is charity, handouts, no viable education and employment opportunities the best that you would do for your Christ?
Your answers to poverty are to house them in broken-down housing units, feed them obesity enhancing diets, expect little of their schools beyond teaching them how to count to ten and read to the comic book level - but not allowed to teach them how to prevent children from having children - and then blame them for being lazy and worthless because they can't compete in your dog eat dog capitalist world, where even a BS doesn't mean squat, just perhaps an entry into the factory floor making widgets for the Boss...
You are entitled to your opinion. We all realize that, but the bottom line is that you or no one else has the right to make these kinds of choices for anyone else. I respect your belief system, but that's what it is YOUR belief system and yes, there is a gray area just like anything else.
 @chickysgirlAnswer to question #1: Christians have never been required to adopt children by the church. They were always "empowered" to adopt or not adopt.
Answer to question #2: Yes, a living child will always get enough from the government, church, other charities, or individuals to support life. Adoptions aside.
Answer to question #3: It is better to impress all the knowledge about caring for others into our children. Christians usually do. Too bad the liberals are trying to take that capability away.
Answer to question #4: Teaching children about contraception is a no brainer, but should only be done by parents, NOT schools who can put an "acceptable" twist on sex while doing it. Sex as a teenager should be discouraged while teaching about contraception, not encouraged.
 @A Believer I would beg to differ that most adoption agencies are Christian. However, that is not the issue here. Do you also feel that Pat Robertson speaks for 'most' Christians? Because he very specifically told a woman on the air that men do not need to take on 'blended' families which included adopted children. Because adopted children can be 'weird'. How many Christian men now feel empowered because one of the church's leaders gave them that freedom to avoid that kiind of situation? Another question for you: since you are assuming the responsibility of taking away the liberties of a woman who has been raped and  knows she cannot provide adequate care for a child, are you also willing to assume the responsibilty for the care of that child in life? Wouldn't it be better to impress upon men that rape is seriously wrong in the first place? Or making sure that you teach your children the same values you have which supposedly should prevent unwanted pregnancies from occurring? Or how about making sure that teens who don't have the same values you might have at least know about contraception and have access to it? I often find this abortion debate interesting in that if we concentrated certain things that some religions preach against, such as the Catholic church and contraception; and if we promoted adoption of children from within our own country, there would be very little need for abortion.Â
 @A Believer "I don't know what you're talking about."
Obviously.
 @OrcasThunder I don't know what you're talking about. Most adoption agencies are Christian. Most life-help charities are Christian... many thousands of Christians give to these charities and help by adopting or becoming foster parents. What more do you require to stop the killing? The only reason there isn't MORE help for these children is because people who'd like to kill them are usually not the same ones who later want to help them.
 @A Believer "My beliefs force someone to allow another to live. Yes, we force LIFE on people"
And yet your "beliefs" do not require you to do what is needed to provide a LIFE for that child..THAT you will gladly leave up to the "choices" the mother has...however slim they may be...
 @OrcasThunder My beliefs force someone to allow another to live. Yes, we force LIFE on people â oh the horror!Your beliefs require a life to be viciously killed for no reason other than "I feel like it." Again... which do you feel is right? The choice is unfettered killing or unfettered saving. Black or White â NO gray.
 @A Believer It is the mother's choice to abort the pregnancy. It is NOT your choice to force YOUR beliefs on anyone.
 @OrcasThunder Actually I'm judging all babies, male or female, to be innocent of any parental wrongdoing, and therefor they don't deserve death. It isn't a mother's choice to kill her baby no matter the reason.
 @A Believer But you are judging ALL women to punish these few..
 @alaska_dreamin Oh yes -- at least some do. I know a few. You can't say "any woman" as a blanket statement. (about anything, really!)
 @Nuclearian You are a complete idiot if you honestly think that any woman ever thinks,"oh, just get an abortion." Abortion is NOT a decision that any woman comes to lightly or without a considerable amount of thought.