US halts Mexico flights for migrants

TUCSON, Ariz. (AP) — The U.S. government has halted flights home for Mexicans caught entering the country illegally in the deadly summer heat of Arizona's deserts, a money-saving move that follows a seven-year experiment that cost taxpayers nearly $100 million.
More than 125,000 passengers were flown deep into Mexico for free since 2004 in an effort that initially met with skepticism from Mexican government officials and migrants, but was gradually embraced as a way to help people back on their feet and save lives.
The Border Patrol hailed it as a way to discourage people from trying their luck again, and it appears to have kept many away — at least for a short time.
But with Border Patrol arrests at 40-year lows and fresh evidence suggesting more people may be heading south of the border than north, officials struggled to fill the planes and found costs more difficult to justify. Flights carrying up to 146 people were cut to once from twice daily last year.
And this summer, there haven't been any.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which includes the Border Patrol, said Monday that it anticipates flights will resume next month in a redesigned program.
A U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity because an agreement has not been reached said flights in the redesigned program would be for Mexicans arrested throughout the United States and run year-round. It would be designed for a mix of Mexicans who committed crimes in the United States and non-criminals.
"Removing Mexican nationals to the interior of Mexico is part of an effort to reduce repeat attempts to illegally enter the United States, avoid the loss of human life and minimize the potential for exploitation of illegal migrants by human smuggling and trafficking organizations as well as other organizations," the department said in a statement.
Mexico's Foreign Relations Department declined to comment Monday.
The flights had operated only in the summer and only in Arizona, designed as a humanitarian effort in response to the many migrants who have died over the last decade trekking through remote deserts in debilitating heat.
In an effort to keep the flights going with fewer migrants crossing, American authorities proposed mixing in Mexicans who commit crimes while living in the U.S.
"Everything comes down to dollars and cents," said George Allen, assistant chief of the Border Patrol's Tucson sector. "We're running into a more budget-conscious society, especially with the government."
He added, "Does it fit within our budget and is there an alternative that is not as effective but still effective?"
The Mexican government balked at seating hardened criminals next to families, elderly and the frail who recently crossed the border in search of work.
"Right off the bat, I can tell you that Mexico was not going to allow, nor will it ever allow, that kind of repatriation, which puts families' safety at risk," said Juan Manuel Calderon, the Mexican consul in Tucson.
U.S. and Mexican negotiators also discussed changing the route from El Paso, Texas, where many Mexicans with criminal records are held, to the central Mexican state of Guanajuato. In the past, the route has been from Tucson, Ariz., to Mexico City.
U.S. Homeland Security Janet Napolitano and Mexico Interior Secretary Alejandro Poire said in February that they planned to launch a pilot program April 1 to fly migrants arrested while living in the United States deep into Mexico. The pilot program was partly a response to complaints from Mexican border cities that too many deportees were being dumped on their streets and contributing to crime and unemployment.
"We wanted to maximize the flight and we couldn't come to an agreement," said Allen. "They were close. It may happen next year, but by the time it drug on, we got through July and for a short period of time, it wouldn't have been realistic."
The U.S. official who declined to be named said costs have been only one factor.
"The reason why (flights were halted this summer) is because we're still in negotiations with the government of Mexico," the official said.
The Mexican Interior Repatriation Program flights carried 125,164 passengers at a cost of $90.6 million since 2004, or an average of $724 each, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which manages all flights for deportees.
The flights ran as few as 38 days in 2009 and as many as 120 days in 2010, when a record 23,384 passengers were flown. Last year, there were 8,893 passengers flown at a cost of $5 million — an average of $562 each.
The flights became a key piece of Border Patrol enforcement in Arizona as the agency moved to end its decades-old, revolving-door policy of taking migrants to the nearest border crossing to try again hours later.
The agency's new strategy, introduced in Tucson last year and later extended to the entire border, relies on tougher punishments that were rolled out in recent years. One calls for jail for up to six months and another one buses migrants to border cities hundreds of miles away to be deported there.
The one-way flights to Mexico City were aimed at first-time offenders and families. They were always voluntary and Allen said about 70 percent declined when they were introduced. But, as jail time and other punishments became more common, migrants increasingly jumped at the opportunity.
Without the flights, the Border Patrol is relying more on other punishments. It sends 70 people to federal court in downtown Tucson each weekday to face jail time. Deportation buses head east daily to Del Rio, Texas, and, when there are enough people to fill the seats, west to San Diego or Calexico, Calif.
Allen said Border Patrol data shows migrants who took the flights were less likely to be found again crossing the border illegally, though the agency has faced criticism for failing to release evidence of whether its tougher punishments are working.
In 2010, the Government Accountability Office said U.S. authorities had not shown the one-way flights were effective.
In Nogales, Mexico — about 60 miles south of the cavernous Border Patrol station in Tucson where most migrants arrested in Arizona are taken — more than a dozen deportees interviewed say they would accept a free flight home.
Juana Hernandez was dreading the two-day bus ride to her home in the central Mexican state of Michoacan and shared none of the Mexican government's objections to being seated alongside hardened criminals on a plane.
The flights appear to have discouraged migrants from crossing immediately after being deported but results over the long term were less clear.
Guillermo Martinez took a flight when he was deported a second time in 2010 but grew restless after an unsuccessful, two-year job search in his central Mexican state of Aguascalientes led to marital problems.
The Border Patrol arrested him in April with a group of 12 that agreed to pay a smuggler $1,500 each and spent nearly four months in an Arizona jail.
Martinez, who had only $17 in his pocket when he was deported last month, said he would accept another flight to Mexico City if it were offered and would try again to find a job back home.
Instead, he planned to stay in Nogales a couple months before trying to cross the border again, hoping to reach Atlanta, where his cousin promised a $12-an-hour job at a furniture factory. He dismissed the prospect of more jail time if he is arrested again.
"It would be lost time (in jail) but what do I have waiting for me if I return to Mexico?" he asked plaintively, sitting on back doorstep of a migrant shelter.
More than 125,000 passengers were flown deep into Mexico for free since 2004 in an effort that initially met with skepticism from Mexican government officials and migrants, but was gradually embraced as a way to help people back on their feet and save lives.
The Border Patrol hailed it as a way to discourage people from trying their luck again, and it appears to have kept many away — at least for a short time.
But with Border Patrol arrests at 40-year lows and fresh evidence suggesting more people may be heading south of the border than north, officials struggled to fill the planes and found costs more difficult to justify. Flights carrying up to 146 people were cut to once from twice daily last year.
And this summer, there haven't been any.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which includes the Border Patrol, said Monday that it anticipates flights will resume next month in a redesigned program.
A U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity because an agreement has not been reached said flights in the redesigned program would be for Mexicans arrested throughout the United States and run year-round. It would be designed for a mix of Mexicans who committed crimes in the United States and non-criminals.
"Removing Mexican nationals to the interior of Mexico is part of an effort to reduce repeat attempts to illegally enter the United States, avoid the loss of human life and minimize the potential for exploitation of illegal migrants by human smuggling and trafficking organizations as well as other organizations," the department said in a statement.
Mexico's Foreign Relations Department declined to comment Monday.
The flights had operated only in the summer and only in Arizona, designed as a humanitarian effort in response to the many migrants who have died over the last decade trekking through remote deserts in debilitating heat.
In an effort to keep the flights going with fewer migrants crossing, American authorities proposed mixing in Mexicans who commit crimes while living in the U.S.
"Everything comes down to dollars and cents," said George Allen, assistant chief of the Border Patrol's Tucson sector. "We're running into a more budget-conscious society, especially with the government."
He added, "Does it fit within our budget and is there an alternative that is not as effective but still effective?"
The Mexican government balked at seating hardened criminals next to families, elderly and the frail who recently crossed the border in search of work.
"Right off the bat, I can tell you that Mexico was not going to allow, nor will it ever allow, that kind of repatriation, which puts families' safety at risk," said Juan Manuel Calderon, the Mexican consul in Tucson.
U.S. and Mexican negotiators also discussed changing the route from El Paso, Texas, where many Mexicans with criminal records are held, to the central Mexican state of Guanajuato. In the past, the route has been from Tucson, Ariz., to Mexico City.
U.S. Homeland Security Janet Napolitano and Mexico Interior Secretary Alejandro Poire said in February that they planned to launch a pilot program April 1 to fly migrants arrested while living in the United States deep into Mexico. The pilot program was partly a response to complaints from Mexican border cities that too many deportees were being dumped on their streets and contributing to crime and unemployment.
"We wanted to maximize the flight and we couldn't come to an agreement," said Allen. "They were close. It may happen next year, but by the time it drug on, we got through July and for a short period of time, it wouldn't have been realistic."
The U.S. official who declined to be named said costs have been only one factor.
"The reason why (flights were halted this summer) is because we're still in negotiations with the government of Mexico," the official said.
The Mexican Interior Repatriation Program flights carried 125,164 passengers at a cost of $90.6 million since 2004, or an average of $724 each, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which manages all flights for deportees.
The flights ran as few as 38 days in 2009 and as many as 120 days in 2010, when a record 23,384 passengers were flown. Last year, there were 8,893 passengers flown at a cost of $5 million — an average of $562 each.
The flights became a key piece of Border Patrol enforcement in Arizona as the agency moved to end its decades-old, revolving-door policy of taking migrants to the nearest border crossing to try again hours later.
The agency's new strategy, introduced in Tucson last year and later extended to the entire border, relies on tougher punishments that were rolled out in recent years. One calls for jail for up to six months and another one buses migrants to border cities hundreds of miles away to be deported there.
The one-way flights to Mexico City were aimed at first-time offenders and families. They were always voluntary and Allen said about 70 percent declined when they were introduced. But, as jail time and other punishments became more common, migrants increasingly jumped at the opportunity.
Without the flights, the Border Patrol is relying more on other punishments. It sends 70 people to federal court in downtown Tucson each weekday to face jail time. Deportation buses head east daily to Del Rio, Texas, and, when there are enough people to fill the seats, west to San Diego or Calexico, Calif.
Allen said Border Patrol data shows migrants who took the flights were less likely to be found again crossing the border illegally, though the agency has faced criticism for failing to release evidence of whether its tougher punishments are working.
In 2010, the Government Accountability Office said U.S. authorities had not shown the one-way flights were effective.
In Nogales, Mexico — about 60 miles south of the cavernous Border Patrol station in Tucson where most migrants arrested in Arizona are taken — more than a dozen deportees interviewed say they would accept a free flight home.
Juana Hernandez was dreading the two-day bus ride to her home in the central Mexican state of Michoacan and shared none of the Mexican government's objections to being seated alongside hardened criminals on a plane.
The flights appear to have discouraged migrants from crossing immediately after being deported but results over the long term were less clear.
Guillermo Martinez took a flight when he was deported a second time in 2010 but grew restless after an unsuccessful, two-year job search in his central Mexican state of Aguascalientes led to marital problems.
The Border Patrol arrested him in April with a group of 12 that agreed to pay a smuggler $1,500 each and spent nearly four months in an Arizona jail.
Martinez, who had only $17 in his pocket when he was deported last month, said he would accept another flight to Mexico City if it were offered and would try again to find a job back home.
Instead, he planned to stay in Nogales a couple months before trying to cross the border again, hoping to reach Atlanta, where his cousin promised a $12-an-hour job at a furniture factory. He dismissed the prospect of more jail time if he is arrested again.
"It would be lost time (in jail) but what do I have waiting for me if I return to Mexico?" he asked plaintively, sitting on back doorstep of a migrant shelter.
You say migrants in the headline, then in the story you say "Mexicans caught entering the country illegally"
Not to nitpick but if they entered the United States of America "Illegally" they are lawbreakers, not migrants.
Â
To the guy that thinks if he could get a job in Mexico, good luck with that. They put illegal aliens in jail at hard labor if you get caught in Mexico illegally.
If there were no jobs here and there were in Mexico, I would jump the fence into Mexico if that is what it took to feed my family. Having said that, I think we need to come down hard on employers who hire these guys, since they then have a huge advantage competing with other business doing things the right way. You know, paying payroll taxes, L&I taxes, a proper wage. We also need a program where Mexicans can come into this country legally to work, with a document good for three years, renewable for another three years. This is so we know where they are and are obeying our laws. At the end of the six years, they MUST return to their country to renew again if they so choose. Existing immigrants in this country have one year to register and receive this work document. Any immigrant picked up after one year is deported and never given a document so he cannot return. We just need to know who they are and where they are.
Â
As for driver's licenses and anchor babies, I really have no idea what to do. Maybe a driver's license after testing if and only if they have one of these work permits. And the license expires when the permit expires. Anchor babies - well, is it the child's fault their parents are illegal? And does it matter? Tough issue.Â
Why are these Illegals entering our country?Â
Because their home country is a place where the poor have no chance to earn money or improve their lives. These countries have two classes, rich and poor, with a very small middle class. Churches also are very strong in these countries, helping to control the minds and lives of the poor, in the best interest of the rich. Money and Companies from this country also contribute to the exploitation of these workers in their own country, "Banana Republic"Â
So they come here: The employers who can't outsource their type of business outsource their employees. Agricultural workers are the most common, food processing, home building, landscaping. construction , service - cleaning, restaurant. and many other jobs are held by these workers. Then there are the drug dealers.
Round them up and ship them out sounds good but who will do their jobs? How will you keep them out? Who will pay for keeping them out? If you are serious about getting rid of the illegals, fine and jail the employers. No jobs and they will leave.
W Bush should have invaded Mexico rather than Iraq, he would have found more weapons of mass invasion. Follow the money, the employers in this country don't want the illegals to leave. The leaders and money from this country don't want to overthrow the control of Mexico by the rich and the Catholic Church, allowing for the poor to make a better life for themselves and move toward a middle class.
 @rockguy No the majority of the companies only Hire women because they do a better job! So men are having to cross
 @Jake Easton == Simple minded.
Flights have been a been discountinued in favor of Trebuchet... first time offenders get a parachute... second timers yeah... NEXT
@Freespeech You cant say fancy words like Trebuchet, it confuses people I'll translate for them so they get it. Freespeech meant to say fancy catapult. Â
They all must go!! Every one of them!!
 @None Who's going to mow your lawn, pick your vegetables and do stuff you think you're too good for?
@Larry*X*K @None The neighborhood kids who want to make some money.. just like I did when I was a kid... mowed lawns, picked berries, filberts (hazelnuts), cucumbers, black caps... (so I would have money for school clothes, and spending..)
 @Stock Woodie We should its Americas fault that there is even as much violence in Mexico as there is here! If we didn't buy drug or do drugs they wouldn't produce the drugs causing this whole war on drug control!
 @Jake Easton No one owns the land per say, however, the United States of America does reside on the land it protects. Try going to North Korea, China, or Iran (or any other country for that matter) without the proper authority and see what happens. How does Mexico help the U.S. economy? Maybe we should send the "billions of dollars" tax bill their way.
 @Mr. H   @You guys are dumb why do you think you own the land! If it wasn't for Mexico our economy would be worst! Mexico is in the top 10 for overall wealth, and power. The U.S. well is in top 10 for Power and DEBT!!!!!
 @Larry*X*K  @None I hope you are kidding. What do you think they are your slaves? Who used to do all those jobs? They haven't always been here.
 @Larry*X*K Sounds like you're pretty naive Larry. There are plenty of people that will do labor, you'll just have to pay a little more for them. Instead of subsidizing illegal immigrants, lets use that money to subsidize farmers to help pay for slight increased wages. I'd much rather have our money go to farmers than illegal immigrants. Cut off ALL jobs to illegals and they will leave on their own accord.Â
BTW, I mow my own lawn, tend to my own plants and vegetables.
 @buggy  @None Of course I don't think they are slaves.
Nowadays kids want to be rap starts or NBA 'heroes' and not interested doing chores like mowing yards. Just saying, these are different times with different values
"complaints from Mexican border cities that too many deportees were being dumped on their streets and contributing to crime and unemployment". Really? Then why is is OK to have them infest our streets? The cost of flying them out of here may seem high, but it is saving us even more in having to support them through welfare, medical, food stamps, law enforcement costs etc.... I say round them all up send them to a central holding facility and then ship them back.
I have to laugh at the responses to my 'suggestion'. If you were able to check my comments on the old intense debate, you'd see that I am NOT pro criminal no matter the ethnic background. I am however very PRO immigrant.
Less than 2% of the people living in the USA do NOT have immigrant ancestors, and I count myself as one of the blessed whose foreparents had the guts to get up and GO to a promising land.
Â
Fixing this mess requires a two pronged effort:
Â
1) Require fixing MEXICO! It might be cheaper for us just to annex it! Perhaps if the people of Mexico felt they were being invaded, they would rise up and fix their own country instead of hoping for a fix for their lives in another country.
Â
2) As this is an election year, we have an opportunity to elect people that will not ignore this situation:
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/a/Arizona-Desert-Trash.htm
but WILL take steps to begin FIXING our very broken immigration process. It is a NATIONAL disgrace. When you fill out your ballot, if you can't see that your legislator has had the fortitude to tackle this problem, then you have an obligation to VOTE THEM OUT and vote IN someone that will.
 @Commenter87643 Like I said Mexico has Power and more Wealth than the Us as of Forbes!!!
You guys are cruel can you guys imagine being in their shoes. Living their lives. How would you make money??? Instead of Bit*c*ing  about it you should be lucky that you live here in the U.S.
@Jake Easton We are lucky to live here in the US, but immigration problem is just that, and people are fed up with everything from the catch and release programs. Those that make it here recieve better care than US citizens and people are flat done putting up with it . My family and I live about an hour from the border so unlike yourself I have the right to talk about this subject.Â
 @Kodiak  @Jake I'm not weighing in on the illegal argument. I'm just curious. Kodiak? If you live in Florida, why do you post on KOMO? Wouldn't you be more interested in something closer to home?
 @Kodiak I live in EL paso 1 month a year actually!
I live in Texas, and just recently relocated here after 37 years of living in wa. I still post on KOMO and read Seattle news because I have friends and family there still and a couple running for political office, so I like to keep myself educated.
 @chandler I live in SC at this time due to military transfer almost two years ago. I call Wa home. My 2 oldest children still live in Wa and we are transferring back up there next summer. I read Komo news every day to know whats' going on in my home state. Kodiak probably does read the news closer to his/hers residence as well, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't read the news around our Country or even world.
 @chandler  @Kodiak If you took 1/2 a minute to do a background check on Kodiak, you'd find the big K living in Texas.
100% Deportation. No Amnesty. No Exceptions. NO MORE EXCUSES!!!
 @TheTruncheon Fine and Jail anyone who hires and Illegal. They will self deport.
I think illegals with NO criminal status may be bused deeply into Mexico at Mexico's expense. Illegals who are also criminals may be flown out over the closest large body of water and pushed off the plane. Bet that'd be a deterrent, but dangit, that's also a form of littering, so we can't do it.
 @Commenter87643 The way you talk by having you walk our streets its the worst type of TRASH!
 @Commenter87643 It's a good thing that nobody cares what you think. Perhaps hateful people like you who spew venomous garbage from their mouths should be the ones we should be concerned about.Â
Put them in the back of a tractor trailer, without air conditioning, and let them try their luck......again. When our government wastes our tax dollars to FLY these criminals home, while cutting back on programs for OUR citizens due to "lack of funds," I get REAL pissed off. Time to stand UP, SPEAK UP, and put our foot DOWN on the governmental ignorance that is robbing our fellow Americans while giving free rides to illegals.
 @LoudNoises Wow - it is a good thing the Native American's didn't do that to us when "we" landed after invading their country.Â
Â
Your hateful rhetoric does NOBODY any good.
 @commonHuskyfan And what do you think the Native Americans did to those they found here when they "invaded"? Do you really believe that they were the first people here in what we call the United States of America?
 @LoudNoises You are evil. What goes around comes around!
 @Jake Easton It's not "evil" to kick intruders out of your home and make every effort to ensure they never return to break in again. This is NO different. Wake up and SMELL THE INVASION.
 @TheTruncheon  @Jake Easton The people who employ the invited the intruders.
@Jake Easton @LoudNoises Jake until you live it you have no room to talk!
No KOMO, migrants apply for entry, get permission and cross borders with everyone else. These people are ILLEGALS
 @HawkEye We are not living in Mississippi or Arizon guys we live in the North! Quit acting like Hill-billies this is really low especially for Seattle -_-
Just because you are born or live north of the Mason Dixon doesn't make you automatically intelligent....the fact is Seattle is one of the stupidest supposedly smart places I've ever lived....common sense is in short supply...however the farther you move away from Seattle things start to become rational... @Jake Easton  @HawkEyeÂ
 @Stock Woodie Then why do you guys care. Like America hasnt robbed Mexico before common you guys see what you wanna see go to Mexico and you will see what I mean, and I'm not talking about going to Cancun or Cabo I mean Juarez or Tijuana!!!!
 @Jake Easton It's not just about jobs. Keep your blinders on; one day you might see the light.
 @Truth Percolates  @HawkEye Yeah its only a few morons on here that had their lame jobs taken by immigrants so now they are mad :P
@Truth Percolates Ouch!!... but, unfortunately, I do agree,... Seattle is the dumbest "smart" place in the country, right under D.C. We have smart people with no common sense, and no spine to stand for themselves.
They rely on the government, and believe the government will solve everything.. Unfortunately
 @Jake Easton And do you think that the North doesn't have any illegals? They are all over in the PNW and only getting worse. I don't remember seeing even that many in the 90's up in the Pacific Northwest. I moved away for six years with the military and then moved back up in '05 and it was as obvious as you can get, that there was a big influx of illegals. I visited my friends just outside Portland Oregon in '05 and I thought I was in Mexico for a few minutes. Legal Migration is great, dandy or whatever you want to call it. That's LEGAL! Illegal trespassing, draining our resources and committing crimes on our citizens should NOT be allowed and yet places like Seattle and Portland almost encourage it by way of not doing anything to fix it.
 @Jake Easton  @Robinsnest Yes! Haven't you SEEN it??? OK, actually, it's not on their foreheads, it's in the sheer number of people. According to SEVERAL sources, about 1,000,000 people immigrate to the US each year. So when you begin to see huge numbers of people that weren't here LAST year, then you can know that at least half of them are NOT legal. THAT'S HOW YOU KNOW.
 @Robinsnest How do you know they are illegal do they have a sticker on their forehead???
@Jake Easton @HawkEye @Sid Vishess
Well I live in the deep south, about an hour from the border, its a really big problem y'all wouldn't understand up north in the PNW. Not even the Mexicans we live with like the illegals. Go post your "hillbilly" propaganda someplace else.
 @Kodiak  @Sid Vishess  @Jake  @HawkEye Like I said EL paso no you shut the f up!
 @Kodiak  @Jake  @HawkEye Don't tar us Northwesters all with the same brush.Although we have a significant illegal problem here, we realize that border States have it much worse.  Doesn't help that this Administration fudges its deportation numbers and fights the States at every opportunity.
 @HawkEye E-verify for all workers. Harsh penalties for employers. Jail. Seizure of assets.
Crop forfeiture. We don't have to do anything to the illegals themselves. Just the people that hire them. Oh, that and cutting off ALL Federal dollars to sanctuaries' jurisdictions. And no State issued ID. Or social services other than  emergency medical care which we send a bill to the Federal Government.