U.S. special forces deploy to Syrian border
»Play Video
BRUSSELS (AP) - The United States has sent troops to Jordan to bolster its military capabilities in the event Syria's civil war escalates, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Wednesday, reflecting U.S. concerns about the conflict spilling over allies' borders and about the security of Syria's chemical weapons arsenal.
Speaking at a NATO conference of defense ministers, Panetta said the U.S. has been working with Jordan to monitor chemical and biological weapons sites in Syria and also to help Jordan deal with refugees pouring over the border from Syria.
About 150 U.S. troops, largely Army special operations forces, are working out of a military center near Amman, two senior defense officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the mission. The troops have moved back and forth to the Syrian border as part of their work, which is joint planning and intelligence gathering, one official said.
The revelation of U.S. military personnel so close to the 19-month-old Syrian conflict suggests an escalation in the U.S. involvement in the conflict, even as the Obama administration pushes back on any suggestion of a direct intervention in Syria.
News of the U.S. mission to Jordan also follows several days of shelling between Turkey and Syria, an indication that the civil war could become a regional conflict. One of the U.S. defense officials said the extra planning is aimed at avoiding those kinds of clashes between Jordan and Syria.
The development comes with the U.S. presidential election less than a month away, as Republican nominee Mitt Romney criticizes President Barack Obama for weak leadership in foreign policy. Romney has said he would send U.S. troops into Syria if needed to prevent the spread of chemical weapons, while Obama has said that movement or use of chemical weapons would have "enormous consequences."
Panetta has said that while the U.S. believes the weapons are still secure, intelligence suggests the regime might have moved some to protect them.
Syria is believed to have one of the world's largest chemical weapons programs, and the Assad regime has said it might use the weapons against external threats, though not against Syrians. The U.S. and Jordan share the same concern about Syria's chemical and biological weapons - that they could fall into the wrong hands should the regime in Syria collapse and lose control of them.
Jordan's King Abdullah II fears such weapons could go to the al-Qaida terror network or other militants, primarily the Iranian-allied Lebanese Hezbollah - a vocal critic of Jordan's longstanding alliance with the United States.
The Monterey, Calif.-based James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies provided a map purporting to show four Syrian production sites for chemical weapons, three for storage, one for research and development, and two with dual use infrastructure.
Steven Bucci, an expert in chemical weapons at the Heritage Foundation, has told Congress there might be as many as 50 chemical weapons sites. He said in an interview Wednesday that Syria's stockpile is potentially "like a gift from God" for militants since they don't have the know-how to assemble such weapons, while some of Syria's chemical agents are believed to have already been fitted into missile warheads.
Pentagon press secretary George Little, traveling with Panetta, said the U.S. and Jordan agreed that "increased cooperation and more detailed planning are necessary in order to respond to the severe consequences of the Assad regime's brutality."
He said the U.S. has provided medical kits, water tanks and other forms of humanitarian aid to help Jordanians assist Syrian refugees fleeing into their country.
"We have a group of our forces there working to help build a headquarters there and to insure that we make the relationship between the United States and Jordan a strong one so that we can deal with all the possible consequences of what's happening in Syria," Panetta said.
In Jordan, the biggest problem at the moment seems to be the strain put on the country's meager resources by the estimated 200,000 Syrian refugees who have flooded across the border - the largest number fleeing to any country.
Several dozen refugees in Jordan rioted in their desert border camp of Zaatari earlier this month, destroying tents and medicine and leaving scores of refugee families out in the night cold.
Jordanian men also are moving the other way across the border, joining what intelligence officials have estimated to be around 2,000 foreigners fighting alongside Syrian rebels trying to topple Assad. A Jordanian border guard was wounded after armed men - believed trying to go fight - exchanged gunfire at the northern frontier.
Turkey has reinforced its border with artillery and deployed more fighter jets to an air base close to the border region after an errant Syrian mortar shell killed five people in a Turkish border town last week and Turkey retaliated with artillery strikes.
Turkey's military chief, Gen. Necdet Ozel, vowed Wednesday to respond with more force to any further shelling from Syria, keeping up the pressure on its southern neighbor a day after NATO said it stood ready to defend Turkey.
Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in Washington on Wednesday that the Pentagon was planning for "a number of contingencies" and was prepared to provide the administration with options on Syria, if needed.
"But the military instrument of power at this point is not the prominent instrument of power that should be applied in Syria," he said.
Speaking at a NATO conference of defense ministers, Panetta said the U.S. has been working with Jordan to monitor chemical and biological weapons sites in Syria and also to help Jordan deal with refugees pouring over the border from Syria.
About 150 U.S. troops, largely Army special operations forces, are working out of a military center near Amman, two senior defense officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the mission. The troops have moved back and forth to the Syrian border as part of their work, which is joint planning and intelligence gathering, one official said.
The revelation of U.S. military personnel so close to the 19-month-old Syrian conflict suggests an escalation in the U.S. involvement in the conflict, even as the Obama administration pushes back on any suggestion of a direct intervention in Syria.
News of the U.S. mission to Jordan also follows several days of shelling between Turkey and Syria, an indication that the civil war could become a regional conflict. One of the U.S. defense officials said the extra planning is aimed at avoiding those kinds of clashes between Jordan and Syria.
The development comes with the U.S. presidential election less than a month away, as Republican nominee Mitt Romney criticizes President Barack Obama for weak leadership in foreign policy. Romney has said he would send U.S. troops into Syria if needed to prevent the spread of chemical weapons, while Obama has said that movement or use of chemical weapons would have "enormous consequences."
Panetta has said that while the U.S. believes the weapons are still secure, intelligence suggests the regime might have moved some to protect them.
Syria is believed to have one of the world's largest chemical weapons programs, and the Assad regime has said it might use the weapons against external threats, though not against Syrians. The U.S. and Jordan share the same concern about Syria's chemical and biological weapons - that they could fall into the wrong hands should the regime in Syria collapse and lose control of them.
Jordan's King Abdullah II fears such weapons could go to the al-Qaida terror network or other militants, primarily the Iranian-allied Lebanese Hezbollah - a vocal critic of Jordan's longstanding alliance with the United States.
The Monterey, Calif.-based James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies provided a map purporting to show four Syrian production sites for chemical weapons, three for storage, one for research and development, and two with dual use infrastructure.
Steven Bucci, an expert in chemical weapons at the Heritage Foundation, has told Congress there might be as many as 50 chemical weapons sites. He said in an interview Wednesday that Syria's stockpile is potentially "like a gift from God" for militants since they don't have the know-how to assemble such weapons, while some of Syria's chemical agents are believed to have already been fitted into missile warheads.
Pentagon press secretary George Little, traveling with Panetta, said the U.S. and Jordan agreed that "increased cooperation and more detailed planning are necessary in order to respond to the severe consequences of the Assad regime's brutality."
He said the U.S. has provided medical kits, water tanks and other forms of humanitarian aid to help Jordanians assist Syrian refugees fleeing into their country.
"We have a group of our forces there working to help build a headquarters there and to insure that we make the relationship between the United States and Jordan a strong one so that we can deal with all the possible consequences of what's happening in Syria," Panetta said.
In Jordan, the biggest problem at the moment seems to be the strain put on the country's meager resources by the estimated 200,000 Syrian refugees who have flooded across the border - the largest number fleeing to any country.
Several dozen refugees in Jordan rioted in their desert border camp of Zaatari earlier this month, destroying tents and medicine and leaving scores of refugee families out in the night cold.
Jordanian men also are moving the other way across the border, joining what intelligence officials have estimated to be around 2,000 foreigners fighting alongside Syrian rebels trying to topple Assad. A Jordanian border guard was wounded after armed men - believed trying to go fight - exchanged gunfire at the northern frontier.
Turkey has reinforced its border with artillery and deployed more fighter jets to an air base close to the border region after an errant Syrian mortar shell killed five people in a Turkish border town last week and Turkey retaliated with artillery strikes.
Turkey's military chief, Gen. Necdet Ozel, vowed Wednesday to respond with more force to any further shelling from Syria, keeping up the pressure on its southern neighbor a day after NATO said it stood ready to defend Turkey.
Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in Washington on Wednesday that the Pentagon was planning for "a number of contingencies" and was prepared to provide the administration with options on Syria, if needed.
"But the military instrument of power at this point is not the prominent instrument of power that should be applied in Syria," he said.
I am confident that every one in charge in the us govt is stark raving insane. Only GOD can help America and at this rate it will surely take a merical.
Just what we need, more US troops put at risk to defend Muslim terrorist's who want to destroy America. If a bunch of Arabs want to kill each other, who are we to step in the middle and say no?
Here we go again. Can we at least get out of Iraq before going into another country?
Hmm. Don't like the looks of this. Could get very ugly, and since when is the USA the world police?Â
Have you seen our Army up close? Â
Joint Base Lewis-McChord et al?
Â
I am just sure their presence will scare everyone straight.
.
Believe me, it this were happening in your town you'd all have a different post.
Let's keep our military home and send congress and Panetta to fight and the problem would be over in a week. Our military has done a good job but ten years of war is enough.
Just like Vietnam and Iraq,we messed up their countries and only do half-ass job then leave...
I can see this is gonna be another one again....no wonder they all hate us !Â
That's right, only a little over three weeks 'til the election . . . . SURPRISE ! ! !
Somewhere back a few decades, the power mongers of our so called democracy, I believe, decided it would be cheaper to capitalize the world than to try and build democracies,in other words, get them addicted to our western views and life styles, as lord knows we hold ourselves to be more civilly advanced, open-minded, yada,yada,yada.....This vision has been trump for both parties, no matter who sits in the oval chair, they just package it differently, and the media spins it differently, but it makes no difference, many around the world refuse its (attempt) at infusion. I can see their reasoning, and I can see where it is easier to swallow than a war of spending our blood to quell those who rise up against our sovereignty, but golly, when you try a passive-aggressive tactic on such a grand scale, what can you really expect? I don't really even fault Obama for trying diplomacy talk, via apologizing for the US in a wholesale manner, but again, it comes from the angle of superiority.......and could have very well led to this active surge of more violence, as they missed his intent and have used it to fuel more Muslims into the radical  movements......
Â
This will get ugly, real ugly, and will lead to WW3 (or its equivalent)Â
I pray our special forces personnel will be safe in their mission
We don't belong there and it serves no purpose other than to put more Amerikan kids in harms way. And we're wasting tax payers dollars on something that is a complete waste. Obama time and time again has just proven he's another war hawk. Wish Dennis Kucinich would run against him. I'd be tempted to jump party lines just not to have a war hawk as our commander and chief for a change.
 @Blindman The war profiteers are in charge. If it's not Obama sending us to Syria it will be Romney involving us in Iran.
This comment has been deleted
 @Funky-Munky Congress didn't have a say on sending these troops.  The President (advised by the Pentagon and his military advisers) is solely responsible for this deployment. Â
This comment has been deleted
Obama Administration claiming bad intelligence as their excuse for 4 dead in Libya...
Â
I'm confused ....Kurds were killed by WMD's by Saadam but Liberals claimed it was a lie because years later we invaded based on "bad intel" that Dems and R's both agreed on as a valid basis for attack...yet no WMD's were found so it must mean Iran NEVER had WMD's.... Â
Â
So the moral of the story is...Liberals can claim bad intel and it's ok but conservatives can claim bad intel and get hung even if it was true at one time...
Â
But we all know...these 4 murders of innocent American's happened because of....
1. It's Bush's fault
2. a radical Muslim hate movie
3. Obama's dog ate the original intelÂ
Another civil war? Didn't we learn anything from Viet Nam? Let these countries fight their own war and bring our men and women home! Enough already.
"Our troops will be home by Christmas..."
 @TheTruncheon Remember where those words were uttered?  An historic conservative... General Douglas Macarthur during the Korean war, shortly before the Chinese nearly annihilated the Army's 2nd Division and the Marine's 1st Division. Ironic that you use it here
 @TruthinAdverts Actually, it's true I was attempting to be ironic, but was referring to the general sentiments believed by the peoples of Europe as WORLD WAR ONE began in August of 1914....
Oh good, we are spreading more fascist, corporatist, "Democracy". We will be there shortly to murder your innocent women and children while sinking your country into civil war, then we will be there to save you and steal all the natural resources and exploit the labor of whomever is still left breathing. What time will we be in Iran? I heard they want a McDonalds and starbucks.
Â
I wish all americans could get a real close up view of what real war looks like, especially on their own soil. They might start to rethink the business models of the 6 industries that control our government and our war machine and simply let people of the world live in peace like other countries do. Of course, shareholders would never go for that.
Â
In WW2 when the Nazi party was stealing resources from other countries and exploiting slave labor (just like us), It took the utter destruction of every major city in Germany before the people there woke up to what their government had been doing. I had hoped americans were smarter but I am obviously mistaken.Â
Â
lol You people think they hate you because of your freedom, what about the other 180 free countries in the world? Why do they just hate us and not them? Same reason most of the world hated Nazis?
 @T_BONE_WALKER Of course the Nazi's also had that "cram people into concentration camps and gas 'em" policy", but alas... I digress.Â
@T_BONE_WALKER we are not a democracy. We are a war state and must always be at war.
 @T_BONE_WALKER I call "Goodwin's Law".
 "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."
@T_BONE_WALKER "We will be there shortly to murder your innocent women and children while sinking your country into civil war, then we will be there to save you and steal all the natural resources and exploit the labor of whomever is still left breathing."
Â
Hmmmm, if I am not mistaken, Syria is already locked in a bloody battle. The Syrian government has been slaughtering the citizens for a long time.
Â
Personally, I wouldn't wish war on anyone, on anyone's soil, foerign or domestic. I am continually amazed that with all the evidence of the damage of war, to people and property, armies and non-combatants, that anyone would be willing to take up arms against anyone. Yet you go so far as to 'wish Americans could get a close up view of war on their own soil"? I am at a complete loss. Your logic is completely flawed. You have a right to your opinion, but it is just that, an opinion.
 @what?  @T_BONE_WALKER "Syria is already locked in a bloody battle"
Â
Yes it is called a civil war. Obama has paid Al-Qaida to disrupt the peace there so as to sink the country into civil war, so we can ride in there and steal their resources and exploit their labor just like everywhere else we go. http://article.wn.com/view/2012/09/30/Obama_administration_sending_45_million_in_aid_to_al_Qaeda_i/
Â
Personally, I wouldn't wish war on anyone, on anyone's soil, foerign or domestic. I am continually amazed that with all the evidence of the damage of war, to people and property, armies and non-combatants, that anyone would be willing to take up arms against anyone. Yet you go so far as to 'wish Americans could get a close up view of war on their own soil"?
Â
By not being outraged at what your government has been and is doing to people all over the world, you are condoning the slaughter of families by US troops in the name of corporate profits and therein lies the reason WHY we are starting wars continuously. We start wars to steal labor and resources and while you're at a "complete loss" has it ever occurred to you that we are always at war? You are "Amazed" at this? This is exactly why US citizens need to see it up close, so they know what they visit the families of the world with everyday and at no fault of their own. This would help for even you to become aware at what you have supported. Talk about flawed logic? You dont even have the knowledge of what has happened for you to develop any logical input on the matter but you question logic or opinions?
Â
You are one of the many that would find great value in seeing it up close because then you'd learn the why of it all and then you could claim some logical input.
Â
Its just like when the world blamed the German people for the lies and deeds of the Nazis, they will blame you for your part, like it or not.
Â
Â
See the Muslims do not have WMD's just ask them.... Funny how all the Democrats and Obamites are now concerned about WMD's in Syria,,,I'd almost bet some are stamped with Iraq on them...  And the Empty Chair still has Ambassador blood on his hands...
Â
Does O want another war...or just some posturing for the election?
@Truth Percolates Hmm, the concern of chemical weapons has been there since the civil war erupted in Syria. It's isn't something 'manufactured' as a campaign gimmick...
 @what?  @Truth The concern over chemical weapons started shortly after the US provided them for Iraq to use on Iran. Then we used our chemical weapons as an excuse to murder Iraqi citizens and steal Iraqi oil and labor and to pave the way for US business (McDonalds and Chucky Cheese).
Probably Bush's fault.  Or will be if the liberals find out their deity is not who they think.  He will do whatever he needs to do to protect Muslims.
Â
It's not our fight. Â The Saudis could handle this as could other Arab Nations, but no, Barack Husein makes our children fight. Â For what?Â
@sentryone The vast majority of our troops in hot areas around the globe were placed there ever so lovingly by previous presidents. You can't hang that on Obama anymore than you can hang it on Mittens.
Let NATO or Europe pay for this as we can't afford it! Quit being the world's policeman. Lets start rebuilding America and taking care of American citizens -especially the middle/working and lower class!Â
 @HallandOates You still dont get it do you? Business dictates that we attack, steal and exploit. Politicians do what business wants or they dont get the corporate campaign contributions. Business runs your government making your country a fascist country. You could even call it a dictatorship because business controls your democracy. If you want health care, the government will give the insurance industry 30 million new paying customers without any words of cost control.
Â
We arent going there to be cops, we are going there because business wants to kill the cops and steal the resources. Business and profits demand it.
Â
This from the Godfather of right wing fascism, he named/created it.
Â
"Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power.â --Benito Mussolini
Â
From The Oxford Dictionary: The term Fascism was first used of the totalitarian right-wing nationalist regime of Mussolini in Italy (1922â43); the regimes of the Nazis in Germany and Franco in Spain were also Fascist. Fascism tends to include a belief in the supremacy of one national or ethnic group, a contempt for democracy, an insistence on obedience to a powerful leader, and a strong demagogic approach.
Â
Like or not, thats what we have become.
@T_BONE_WALKER @HallandOates "We arent going there to be cops, we are going there because business wants to kill the cops and steal the resources."
Â
Hardly. Syria has little resources. Syria has few comsumers to warrant commercial profit in the way you're implying it.
 @Dawgfan67 Lol, you thought we were talking physical geography? Syria and Iran have a mutual defense plan by and between them. US business wants to nail Iran and has been trying to induce war there for quite awhile now so they can steal the resources and exploit the labor there but, Iran hasn't attacked anyone in over 200 years and wont attack anyone so the US must make it appear as if Syria has done something, we attack Syria because of their civil war, we take their country, Iran holds up its end of the deal and retaliates, and US business is provided an opportunity to profit from the hard work the kids did while dying over there kicking Iran's ass (The real target all along). Hence, Syria being the gateway. We always create a "gateway" or reason, in WW2, Vietnam, Korea, Iraq both times etc.etc.etc. How long til you notice a pattern developing? .
Â
Now run along and get your crayons picked up boy!
 @T_BONE_WALKER Not so hot on the geography are you...LOL Gateway to Iran huh.....Keep spewing
 @Gaikokujin winner, winner chicken dinner.. :D)
 @TheTruncheon  @what? "It does have, however, the city of Damascus"
Â
It will be destroyed though & will be unhabitable.
They have the same resources as Iran, just not the quantity of petroleum, phosphates, chrome and manganese ores, asphalt, iron ore, rock salt, marble, gypsum, hydropower. Syria is also the gateway to Iran and any changes there impact the whole area.
Â
Do you still think we are going there to be nice to those people? You think we are saving people? lol OK
 @what? It does have, however, the city of Damascus, which many claim to be the oldest continuously inhabited city in the world. That's worth some tourist dollars at least.
The camels nose is under the tent.
The first words out of my mouth was "Oh crap" and I hardly ever swear. This sounds like we are sending advisers. Hey Vietnam vets, does that sound familiar?
Not a good idea....still too close to the Muslims and they don't like us,we might get terrorists attacks !