Unions suffer sharp decline in membership

WASHINGTON (AP) - The nation's labor unions suffered sharp declines in membership last year, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said Wednesday, led by losses in the public sector as cash-strapped state and local governments laid off workers and - in some cases - limited collective bargaining rights.
The union membership rate fell from 11.8 percent to 11.3 percent of all workers, the lowest level since the 1930s.
Total membership fell by about 400,000 workers to 14.4 million. More than half the loss - about 234,000 - came from government workers including teachers, firefighters and public administrators.
The losses add another blow to a labor movement already stretched thin by fighting efforts in states like Wisconsin, Indiana and Michigan to curb bargaining rights and weaken union clout.
But unions also saw losses in the private sector, even as the economy expanded modestly. That rate fell of membership fell from 6.9 percent to 6.6 percent, a troubling sign for the future of organized labor, as job growth has generally taken place at nonunion firms.
"To employers, it's going to look like the labor movement is ready for a knockout punch," said Gary Chaison, professor of industrial relations at Clark University in Worcester, Mass. "You can't be a movement and get smaller."
Unions have steadily lost members since their peak in the 1950s, when about one of every three workers was in a union. By 1983, roughly 20 percent of American workers were union members.
Losses in the public sector are hitting unions particularly hard since that has been one of the few areas where membership was growing over the past two decades. About 51 percent of union members work in government, where until recently, there had been little resistance to union organizing.
That began to change when Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker signed a law in 2011 eliminating most union rights for government workers. The state lost about 46,000 union members last year, mostly in the public sector.
Union officials blame losses on the lingering effects of the recession, as well as GOP governors and state lawmakers who have sought to weaken union rights.
"Our still-struggling economy, weak laws and political as well as ideological assaults have taken a toll on union membership, and in the process have also imperiled economic security and good, middle class jobs," said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka.
In Indiana, where a new right-to-work law took effect last March, the state lost about 56,000 union members. The law prohibits unions from requiring workers to pay union fees, even if they benefit from a collective bargaining agreement. Michigan lawmakers approved a similar measure in December.
Another problem for unions is an aging membership that is not being replaced by younger members. By age, the union membership rate was highest among workers ages 55 to 64 (14.9 percent) and lowest among those ages 16 to 24 (4.2 percent).
In New York, the state with the highest union density, nearly one-quarter of the workforce belonged to a union. North Carolina had the lowest at 2.9 percent.
Among full-time wage and salary workers, union members in 2012 had median weekly earnings of $943, while those who were not union members earned $742.
The union membership rate fell from 11.8 percent to 11.3 percent of all workers, the lowest level since the 1930s.
Total membership fell by about 400,000 workers to 14.4 million. More than half the loss - about 234,000 - came from government workers including teachers, firefighters and public administrators.
The losses add another blow to a labor movement already stretched thin by fighting efforts in states like Wisconsin, Indiana and Michigan to curb bargaining rights and weaken union clout.
But unions also saw losses in the private sector, even as the economy expanded modestly. That rate fell of membership fell from 6.9 percent to 6.6 percent, a troubling sign for the future of organized labor, as job growth has generally taken place at nonunion firms.
"To employers, it's going to look like the labor movement is ready for a knockout punch," said Gary Chaison, professor of industrial relations at Clark University in Worcester, Mass. "You can't be a movement and get smaller."
Unions have steadily lost members since their peak in the 1950s, when about one of every three workers was in a union. By 1983, roughly 20 percent of American workers were union members.
Losses in the public sector are hitting unions particularly hard since that has been one of the few areas where membership was growing over the past two decades. About 51 percent of union members work in government, where until recently, there had been little resistance to union organizing.
That began to change when Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker signed a law in 2011 eliminating most union rights for government workers. The state lost about 46,000 union members last year, mostly in the public sector.
Union officials blame losses on the lingering effects of the recession, as well as GOP governors and state lawmakers who have sought to weaken union rights.
"Our still-struggling economy, weak laws and political as well as ideological assaults have taken a toll on union membership, and in the process have also imperiled economic security and good, middle class jobs," said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka.
In Indiana, where a new right-to-work law took effect last March, the state lost about 56,000 union members. The law prohibits unions from requiring workers to pay union fees, even if they benefit from a collective bargaining agreement. Michigan lawmakers approved a similar measure in December.
Another problem for unions is an aging membership that is not being replaced by younger members. By age, the union membership rate was highest among workers ages 55 to 64 (14.9 percent) and lowest among those ages 16 to 24 (4.2 percent).
In New York, the state with the highest union density, nearly one-quarter of the workforce belonged to a union. North Carolina had the lowest at 2.9 percent.
Among full-time wage and salary workers, union members in 2012 had median weekly earnings of $943, while those who were not union members earned $742.
I was in a union for two years and made minimu wage for two years. I paid my union dues out of that.
Union Schmunion,, Â I worked for 37 years for a company,, Â I was a shop steward,,, Â I retired in 2005,,, Â in 2010 the union I worked so hard for voted to eliminate medical,,, dental,,, Â and optical from the retirees so they could enjoy a pay raise,,, Â also,,, Â it's no secret that most unions have been all mobbed up. Here again,, it's like cops and robbers,, Â they need each other for job/position justification at the workers expense.Â
Funny how some of the brightest in our culture are unionized: Â ABA, AMA etc...
the ABA and AMA are a type of Union but it's far from the Unions of today. As an ex union retiree the current unions do more harm than good. When is the last time u needed to pass an exam to get into a union. Some trade skills , yes, but otherwise they just wnt your dues to promote the union leadership agenda. the members are on thier on.
Â
I seen a lot....without Union Rep,a manager calls an employee to his/her office,
that employee always get burnt or fired.IF an employee know his/her rights,asks
an Union Rep to go in the office with him/ her,supervisor and H.R. would talk much
"friendlier"....believe it or not !! So....make sure you use your RIGHTS...tell them to
talk to your Union Rep or Lawyer !!!
Most Union members believe that belonging to a Union is the greatest thing.
Â
Until they have a choice on whether or not to pay dues. Then? Not so much...
One and only job I had that was union... a packer at a grocery store chain... as a part time worker I was to be billed full time union rates even though I was only part time... I refused pay the dues any longer and in turn was terminated for not complying with the union... best to say unions made me hate them all on their own before I got older and got to see just how much trouble they cause as oppose to help!
He looks like a  cross between Stalin and Hitler.
And they have hugely disproportionane influence in Washington State why??????????? They also run amuck on college campuses in the search for membership and diminish the service students and their families receive in education.
The unions in the past were responsible for making changes in the safety of work enviornments, better wages, hours, and benefits for employees, and also for child labor laws. However they have used their power to the point of actually crippling government and business to the point of nonfunctional. I agree skilled labor should make a living wage, but when the demands exceed what is reasonable then it becomes a major problem. Everyone's idea of a living wage and how much their labor is worth varies by lifestyle and expectations.
 @Jatok true. Unions were a good and needed thing back in the days before we had labor laws because in the absence of law, businesses "can" and sometimes do run amok. I work for a company that is unionized in some locations and not union in others. The union people do make more money, but only to the point of covering union dues. Once you take that out, they make the same. What's the point? Union dues are only tax deductible if you itemize and have deductions beyond your standard deduction.
 @chandler You mean way back when deep water horizon exploded into flame due to willful negligence and 11 families lost fathers? Or when the upper branch of the Massey mine blew due to willful negligence while 700+ safety violations were being ignored leaving 29 families without fathers? Yeah, look how much better off the US worker is now that those pesky unions are all but gone. Hope you dont ever slow down and let a 16 yr old work you out of a job when ur 5 years short of a pension....oh wait, what pensiion? I er mean SSI... oh wait, thats going away also. lol it will be fun watching you all starve. I've never seen a bigger group of morons in all my life.
I feel ur emotion but thats what the issue is. If u look closely into the underpinning of ur comments u will find that there is a ton of monies being paid to have eyes looking else. wake up ur being conned.. By the way did those workers have a gun pointed at thier heads to work there?
@T_BONE_WALKER Well, with your spelling and syntax, you really shouldn't be calling people morons.
Bloomberg has a much better article about this. They compare us to Canada and dispel some myths about why the decline is happening. Turns out, surprise, a lot of it has to do with politics.Â
@lakeview Would you happen to have a link to that article? I'd be interested in reading it.
 @robmo Â
Â
Google is your friend..... Â Â Â Â Â Infidel
Â
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-23/the-real-reason-for-the-decline-of-american-unions.html
@unobtanium SILENCE!  I keeeeel you!
Â
Thank you!
The Unions need to fix some things.
Â
Clean up their operations, and their images.   Â
Â
Pick their battles more carefully, and make honest efforts to work with management when possible.Â
Â
Understand that things in business change, and if they don't adapt, they will eventually lose much more than they seek to keep or gain.  A company going out of business, or sending jobs overseas is not going to help the union membership.
Â
I do think that if a Union wins a raise for all employees, then all employees should be paying dues or fees equal to dues. But I can understand people's objections to be forced to join an organization, especially an organization with a checkered past, or that may not always have shown itself to work for the interest of the membership.
Â
Â
Â
 @newspuppy I also believe that the Union shouldn't protect people who abuse the system. If you can't get the job done, then you are in the wrong position and the company should not be afraid to replace you with someone who can.
The union leaders need to redefine who their customers truly are. Like any other customer service business unhappy customers do not stay long.
If you want to join a union that is your right. If you do not want to join a union that is also your right. Union membership should not be a pre-requisite job requirement for anyone.
Maybe if the Unions didn't sponsor candidates that believe in flooding labor markets with cheap, illegal labor that cause downward pressure on wages and has an effect up the labor ladder, I would feel for them.
good point
Union membership is declining, the average wage of the middle class is declining. I wonder if there is a connection there?
 @4ShotLatte Just looking at the last sentence would support that theory.
Â
"Among full-time wage and salary workers, union members in 2012 had median weekly earnings of $943, while those who were not union members earned $742."
"Among full-time wage and salary workers, union members in 2012 had median weekly earnings of $943, while those who were not union members earned $742."
Â
.... funny my non union job pays me more than double that - I accrue vacation up to 200 hours max a year gradually - and I have healthcare for my wife and me for $180 a month and they are 80/20 for everything! .... if your curious how I got that... a few heavy certifications from eight months of studying and good negotiation skills for my job was all I needed to get what I wanted - and I even have a minimum annual COL increase of 3% a year.... and I did that all by myself
Â
signed,
middleclass and proud of it - Freespeech...
 @benevolent misanthrope I have not merged into management I really don't want to either - that is likely to hold me back but I have plenty of room to grow in my new position - one side gets their hands dirty while the other side minds the store ( I like being involved not riding shotgun ) - OTJ experience is what determines your rate of pay... I took my licks in when I was first starting out but I always kept pushing upwards all on my own - I didn't need a union and I have no use for one in my profession. - I highly doubt being unionized would have done anything but take away from my paycheck when I was the lowest on the pay ladder... honestly folks should be taking care of themselves since most of the reasons for a union are eroding away and hence they are losing support - and forced union joining is not 'added' membership | I for certain know I will never join one again and I will most definitely move my kids away from any sort of job that would even have a union on it. - don't even get me started on the union workers I have worked with only doing exactly what the job called for and never going above and beyond because that was another 'union person jobs' to me they are more a hindrance than anything else.
Â
A friend of mine who only interned as a engineer was making six figures when I was only in the 45k starting out .... (he was younger and had no college degree either - a 1 year internship in a high demand application is all he needed) - his networking and people skills got him his job - this did not last for him through the recession but he was at that level for five years up til the big bust and are you going to tell me he needed a union? ... of course he was very good at what he did and is right on par with me now... so anything is possible if someone works hard or has a good in somewhere to get a leg up on something | what the unions would have people believe is that without them we are doomed... I don't buy it and honestly I can accomplish just about anything on my own as long as I work hard enough and play the corporate game smartly.
 @Freespeech Negotiation skills are always important.
Â
My point, which you confirmed, was that an Associates and 11 years of OTJ experience =/= "...eight months of studying and good negotiation skills for my job was all I needed..."
Â
You have to work hard and pay your dues one way or the other. And, still, that is no guarantee. You likely work harder than a lot of people in management who make a lot more money than you.
 @benevolent misanthrope with the benefits and all figured in that is close but I take maximum fed tax withholding so I get a return each yearand with the 401k matching figured in but not just because I got that certification... I have been in this field I am in for 11 years professionally and the only way with my associates degree to switch up to a higher paying position I got that certification and got a job that recognized the value of all the skills I have prior to taking up the new job so even though I was below a few requirements my experience and other knowledge of the inner workings was valuable to justify my request... a 8 month piece of paper will not get a complete newbie with 0 everything my position...it took me awhile to get to this ... likely I would have been here sooner or higher maybe if the recession had not made me take a 1/3 paycut just so I was not sapping off unemployment becoming a darn vegetable....I took a underpaying job for less money and rode this recession out - I got back to where I was and past in just the last two years...the COL increase is in my hiring agreement and this year by that line my pay went up 3% @ 2013 ... so doubt all you want - but I suggest you look at learning your own negotiation skills unless you like your middle brother talking to big brother for you...
 @Freespeech So, for eight months of studying, you make more than $94,000/year with annual 3% COLA. I seriously doubt that.
 @theToucan  @4ShotLatte what about those union members who no longer "have" jobs--like Hostess. That sentence should be amended to read "...while union members whose union demands forced the company out of business had median earnings of $0."
 @chandler  @theToucan  @4ShotLatte You could not have picked a worse example than Hostess. Their union made concession after concession, while upper management compensation went through the roof. No company can long survive incompetent management.
Its not rocket science to figure out why. Unions are not needed anymore. All they do is protect the weaker and more worthless workers and pay them WAY TO MUCH at the same time. I'm not saying all Union workers are worthless, I'm saying that the Unions protect the ones that just show up to collect a check and not pull their own weight. There's no need for Unions anymore because we have "Labor Laws" to protect the worker now.Â
 @Seahawker Unions are like any other "click", they protect the people the leaders like and do nothing for the ones who are unpopular. The real offensive thing is that despite your "popularity level" within the union, you pay those dues every month to be protected like everybody else, only to find that you have no help when you really need it if you aren't one of the "inner circle". Besides that, I have a real problem with being required to join a union and pay dues if I want to get a job in a certain field or company, and then having my dues usually being sent to the Democratic party. Unions should not be in bed with ANY political party; if that were the case, I'd have a little more respect for them, but as it stands, especially in this state, they are a thinly veiled front for the Dems. It is because of this that I have refused jobs that required union membership, as I I feel it is wrong to be forced to give money to a organization I do not agree with.