Man fights to keep wife buried in front yard

STEVENSON, Ala. (AP) - James Davis is fighting to keep the remains of his late wife right where he dug her grave: In the front yard of his home, just a few feet from the porch.
Davis said he was only abiding by Patsy Ruth Davis' wishes when he buried her outside their log home in 2009, yet the city sued to move the body elsewhere. A county judge ordered Davis to disinter his wife, but the ruling is on hold as the Alabama Civil Court of Appeals considers his challenge.
Davis, 73, said he never expected such a fight.
"Good Lord, they've raised pigs in their yard, there's horses out the road here in a corral in the city limits, they've got other gravesites here all over the place," said Davis. "And there shouldn't have been a problem."
While state health officials say family burial plots aren't uncommon in Alabama, city officials worry about the precedent set by allowing a grave on a residential lot on one of the main streets through town. They say state law gives the city some control over where people bury their loved ones and have cited concerns about long-term care, appearance, property values and the complaints of some neighbors.
"We're not in the 1800s any longer," said city attorney Parker Edmiston. "We're not talking about a homestead, we're not talking about someone who is out in the country on 40 acres of land. Mr. Davis lives in downtown Stevenson."
A strong libertarian streak runs through northeast Alabama, which has relatively few zoning laws to govern what people do with their property. Even a neighbor who got into a fight with Davis over the gravesite - Davis said he punched the man - isn't comfortable with limiting what a homeowner can do with his property.
"I don't think it's right, but it's not my place to tell him he can't do it," said George W. Westmoreland, 79, who served three tours of duty in Vietnam. "I laid my life on the line so he would have the right to do this. This is what freedom is about."
Westmoreland declined to discuss his specific objections to the grave.
It's unclear when the appeals court might rule. Attorneys filed initial papers in the appeal on Friday. The decision could come down to whether the judges believe the front-yard grave constitutes a family plot that requires no approval or a cemetery, which would.
In the meantime, Davis has protested by running for City Council. A campaign sign hangs near a bigger sign in his yard that says: "Let Patsy Rest in Peace."
A law professor who is familiar with the case said it's squarely at the intersection of personal rights and government's power to regulate private property. While disputes over graves in peoples' yards might be rare, lawsuits over the use of eminent domain actions and zoning restrictions are becoming more common as the U.S. population grows, said Joseph Snoe, who teaches property law at Samford University in suburban Birmingham.
"The United States Supreme Court has said that the states, and the cities through the states, have the power to regulate. But if it goes too far ... then the government's got to pay, and there are certain things the government just doesn't have the power to do," he said. "As we get bigger and as government gets bigger and as people are more regulated ... you start having more and more disagreements."
Davis, a longtime carpenter, built the family's home on a corner on Broad Street about 30 years ago in Stevenson, a town of about 2,600 in northeast Alabama. Once a bustling railroad stop, the city is now so quiet some people don't bother locking their doors. Stars twinkle brightly in the night sky; there aren't many lights to blot them out.
Davis first met Patsy when she was a little girl. They were married for 48 years, but she spent most of her final days bedridden with crippling arthritis. Seated on a bench beside her marble headstone and flower-covered grave, Davis said he and his wife planned to have their bodies cremated until she revealed she was terrified by the thought.
"She said this is where she wanted to be and could she be put here, and I told her, 'Yeah,'" Davis said. "I didn't think there'd be any problem."
There was, though. A big one.
After his wife died on April 18, 2009, the City Council rejected Davis' request for a cemetery permit. The decision came even though the county health department signed off on the residential burial, saying it wouldn't cause any sanitation problems.
Ignoring the council's decision, Davis said he and a son-in-law cranked a backhoe and dug a grave just a few feet from the house. A mortuary installed a concrete vault, and workers lowered Patsy's body into the plot in a nice, metal casket.
The city sued, and the case went to trial early this year. That's when a judge ordered Davis to move his wife's remains to a licensed cemetery. That order is on hold to give the state appeals court time to rule.
For now, Davis visits his wife's grave each time he walks out the front door. He puts fresh artificial flowers on it regularly, and he washes off the marker when raindrops splatter dirt on the gray stone. At Christmas, he said, he and other relatives hold a little prayer vigil around the grave, which is beside an old wooden garage.
Edmiston said the man rejected several compromises from the city, including the offer of two plots in the municipal graveyard.
While state officials say they don't know how many people might be buried on residential lots in Alabama, burials on private property in Alabama are not uncommon, said Sherry Bradley, deputy environmental director for the state Department of Public Health.
While the state can regulate cemeteries, Bradley said it doesn't have any control over family burial plots. The city contends the grave at Davis' home is an illegal cemetery that falls under government oversight, said Edmiston, the city lawyer.
If nothing else, Edmiston said, the appeals court might decide what constitutes a "family burial plot" in Alabama, and what's a cemetery.
"It would be far-reaching if they say anyone can bury someone in their front yard if there are no drainage issues," he said.
As it is, Davis said his five children will bury him in the yard beside Patsy after he dies, and they and his 15 grandchildren will care for the property from then on.
"That's my perpetual care," said Davis, referring to the city's worry about what the grave will look like after he dies.
Davis is adamant that he won't move the body, regardless of what any court says.
"If they get it done it'll be after I'm gone," said Davis. "So if they order her to be moved, it's a death sentence to me. I'll meet Mama sooner than I planned on it."
Davis said he was only abiding by Patsy Ruth Davis' wishes when he buried her outside their log home in 2009, yet the city sued to move the body elsewhere. A county judge ordered Davis to disinter his wife, but the ruling is on hold as the Alabama Civil Court of Appeals considers his challenge.
Davis, 73, said he never expected such a fight.
"Good Lord, they've raised pigs in their yard, there's horses out the road here in a corral in the city limits, they've got other gravesites here all over the place," said Davis. "And there shouldn't have been a problem."
While state health officials say family burial plots aren't uncommon in Alabama, city officials worry about the precedent set by allowing a grave on a residential lot on one of the main streets through town. They say state law gives the city some control over where people bury their loved ones and have cited concerns about long-term care, appearance, property values and the complaints of some neighbors.
"We're not in the 1800s any longer," said city attorney Parker Edmiston. "We're not talking about a homestead, we're not talking about someone who is out in the country on 40 acres of land. Mr. Davis lives in downtown Stevenson."
A strong libertarian streak runs through northeast Alabama, which has relatively few zoning laws to govern what people do with their property. Even a neighbor who got into a fight with Davis over the gravesite - Davis said he punched the man - isn't comfortable with limiting what a homeowner can do with his property.
"I don't think it's right, but it's not my place to tell him he can't do it," said George W. Westmoreland, 79, who served three tours of duty in Vietnam. "I laid my life on the line so he would have the right to do this. This is what freedom is about."
Westmoreland declined to discuss his specific objections to the grave.
It's unclear when the appeals court might rule. Attorneys filed initial papers in the appeal on Friday. The decision could come down to whether the judges believe the front-yard grave constitutes a family plot that requires no approval or a cemetery, which would.
In the meantime, Davis has protested by running for City Council. A campaign sign hangs near a bigger sign in his yard that says: "Let Patsy Rest in Peace."
A law professor who is familiar with the case said it's squarely at the intersection of personal rights and government's power to regulate private property. While disputes over graves in peoples' yards might be rare, lawsuits over the use of eminent domain actions and zoning restrictions are becoming more common as the U.S. population grows, said Joseph Snoe, who teaches property law at Samford University in suburban Birmingham.
"The United States Supreme Court has said that the states, and the cities through the states, have the power to regulate. But if it goes too far ... then the government's got to pay, and there are certain things the government just doesn't have the power to do," he said. "As we get bigger and as government gets bigger and as people are more regulated ... you start having more and more disagreements."
Davis, a longtime carpenter, built the family's home on a corner on Broad Street about 30 years ago in Stevenson, a town of about 2,600 in northeast Alabama. Once a bustling railroad stop, the city is now so quiet some people don't bother locking their doors. Stars twinkle brightly in the night sky; there aren't many lights to blot them out.
Davis first met Patsy when she was a little girl. They were married for 48 years, but she spent most of her final days bedridden with crippling arthritis. Seated on a bench beside her marble headstone and flower-covered grave, Davis said he and his wife planned to have their bodies cremated until she revealed she was terrified by the thought.
"She said this is where she wanted to be and could she be put here, and I told her, 'Yeah,'" Davis said. "I didn't think there'd be any problem."
There was, though. A big one.
After his wife died on April 18, 2009, the City Council rejected Davis' request for a cemetery permit. The decision came even though the county health department signed off on the residential burial, saying it wouldn't cause any sanitation problems.
Ignoring the council's decision, Davis said he and a son-in-law cranked a backhoe and dug a grave just a few feet from the house. A mortuary installed a concrete vault, and workers lowered Patsy's body into the plot in a nice, metal casket.
The city sued, and the case went to trial early this year. That's when a judge ordered Davis to move his wife's remains to a licensed cemetery. That order is on hold to give the state appeals court time to rule.
For now, Davis visits his wife's grave each time he walks out the front door. He puts fresh artificial flowers on it regularly, and he washes off the marker when raindrops splatter dirt on the gray stone. At Christmas, he said, he and other relatives hold a little prayer vigil around the grave, which is beside an old wooden garage.
Edmiston said the man rejected several compromises from the city, including the offer of two plots in the municipal graveyard.
While state officials say they don't know how many people might be buried on residential lots in Alabama, burials on private property in Alabama are not uncommon, said Sherry Bradley, deputy environmental director for the state Department of Public Health.
While the state can regulate cemeteries, Bradley said it doesn't have any control over family burial plots. The city contends the grave at Davis' home is an illegal cemetery that falls under government oversight, said Edmiston, the city lawyer.
If nothing else, Edmiston said, the appeals court might decide what constitutes a "family burial plot" in Alabama, and what's a cemetery.
"It would be far-reaching if they say anyone can bury someone in their front yard if there are no drainage issues," he said.
As it is, Davis said his five children will bury him in the yard beside Patsy after he dies, and they and his 15 grandchildren will care for the property from then on.
"That's my perpetual care," said Davis, referring to the city's worry about what the grave will look like after he dies.
Davis is adamant that he won't move the body, regardless of what any court says.
"If they get it done it'll be after I'm gone," said Davis. "So if they order her to be moved, it's a death sentence to me. I'll meet Mama sooner than I planned on it."
Fresh artificial flowers, huh?
stand up for your freedom ! because its going fast !!
Â
"I don't think it's right, but it's not my place to tell him he can't do it," said George W. Westmoreland, 79, who served three tours of duty in Vietnam. "I laid my life on the line so he would have the right to do this. This is what freedom is about."Awesome attitude!
 @Sovereign That's probably one of the best quotes I've heard from a public official. Too many people think that because they disagree, they need to change the other person.
Leave to poor man alone ~ he's not hurting anything!!!! Some people have nothing better to do than try and mind other peoples business!!!!! He's content to have her there ` it's where she wanted to be! Why does anyone else care!!!!!!! It's none of their business ` I say that once again!!!!!!
I believe the issue isnt that she is buried there as much as she isnt dead yet!
Would I do it? No. But it's his property, and his wishes. As long as there's no smell, noise or other obvious disruptions from the grave, I see no problem with it.
Leave the man be. He has his loved one near and I find that most endearing.Â
Â
Nothing to see or say here. Leave him alone.
""I don't think it's right, but it's not my place to tell him he can't do it," said George W. Westmoreland, 79, who served three tours of duty in Vietnam. "I laid my life on the line so he would have the right to do this. This is what freedom is about.""
Â
Best part of any article I've read all day. Â
This guy's biggest problem is that he is a Caucasian male. If were a Native American, nobody would touch this issue.
He can put it in his will what his wishes are, and if the family is unable to maintain the property, that it be set as a park for the town with the provision that he and his wife be left in peace right where they are. Depending on the age of the home, maybe he could see if it would be put on the historic registry and protected under those conditions. He needs a good attorney to explor this for him.
Oh for the love of all thats good, leave the poor man alone.  He did as his wife of 48 years asked him to do. I dont think its bothering any of his neighbors.  Isnt there enough other things in this world to worry about?  Sounds like this guy did things right and is respecting his wife's wishes each day.  Leave him in peace.
I love how they throw around the freedom word like we are free..lol we are not free we are slaves to our govt we lost all rights in 2001.
 @vampiregoat69 It started long before that. In the 50's. Read Atlas Shrugged - Ayn Rand predicted all this way back then.
 @vampiregoat69 Lost many of our rights long before 2001.
So you never really ever own your property now do you?? Good old governement "for the people", - - - -No scratch that," by the people",- - -Â No scatch that too.
 @SchönLicht People have not owned their property for a very long time when it comes to zoning ordinances and such.
Only in America, can you bust your ass your entire lifetime to achieve the "American Dream," and eek out enough money after being taxed to death by our wonderful government to still be able to buy a home. Then, once you've bought that home, you get taxed MORE for the land it sits on, and told what you can and can't DO with, or ON it. Leave this man alone, let him and his wife have some peace, and let her rest at HOME, rather than in a "licensed, overcharging graveyard." Death is BIG business, and you can bet your butt that there are a lot of lawmaking fingers in the pockets of those who benefit from it.
I feel for him, I really do, but that house may not remain in the same family 'forever' and what if someone wanted to add on or something.......I don't know. Â It could get weird, couldn't it?
 @Doxie When this man passes on and the house goes to his child then they can make the decision to keep the house in the family. Or move their mothers remains to be buried next to each other. If they choose to sell the house then the new owners can choose to keep the body or have it moved respectfully to a local cemetery. Â
@Doxie Yeah it would be a shocking discovery when you go to add on that new bedroom. I think the question is, is not whether its ok or should be legal, but like what you pointed out, "what to do if". I will say this we build on native burial sites all the time.  I hope this man get to keep his wife right where she lay, and if his wishes are to be planted next to her I hope that happens as well.Â
 @Kodiak  @Doxie Whether or not anyone decides it is legal or illegal, it will always be lawful to have buried her there.  Let lawful and unlawful be your guide, and let other people in their own private agreements manage their own legalities therein.
 @Kodiak  @Doxie It was actually the 'building on Native burial grounds' that came to my mind.  But as long as it was disclosed, maybe it wouldn't be a problem.  I hope he can keep her there too, he obviously has put a lot of love into her site.  Heck, if Elvis and his parents can be buried at his home........this cannot be all that unusual.
@Doxie Camano Island was a burial ground for a Whidbey tribe. I remember as a kid digging up bones and even a few skulls. When I got older and started building my own houses out there we were always very careful and would notify the UW when we found artifacts or bodies so they could go back to their people. My tribe sold out and lets them go for sale, my wifes tribe preserves them in the Alutiiq museum. Â Â Bottom line is right now this is this mans home/ property, and It will be a shame if he has to exhume his wife and move her remains.Â
If people want to use thier front yard as a family plot, then nieghbors should just be okay with it-right? I don't think so. It sound good to say let it be, but if your a property owner and your ready to sell, where does that put in the market. Who is ready to buy a house next to a man who buried his wife in the front yard?
He made the decision that his house is not for sell and is okay, but that effects the others in the nieghborhood.
Honetly, would you buy a house in a nieghborhood where interning your loved ones in the front yard is not a problem?
 @snoopy84 sure, if it was in a town of two thousand people where people don't even bother to lock their doors. It's not like the guy lives in Issaquah where all the houses look alike and you can only tell where you are by the street numbers.
 @snoopy84 Yes, I'd not feel uncomfortable at all. Just like I wouldn't feel uncomfortable, or unsafe/sanitary to find out they'd buried a loved dog, cat, or bird.Â
Â
They did this in a sanitary matter, it's lined with concrete, she's in a casket. It's deep enough they don't have to worry about rain storms washing up bones or anything.Â
I would buy one in such a neighborhood long before I'd buy one in a neighborhood where a bunch of fascists on an HOA board dictate what color my trim must be, and which variety of plants I can put in.  "lowering property value" because of this is a baseless claim, and given the appearance of the house itself, the grave actually enhances the property's appearance with some color.
 @georgef I doubt you even get any trim...
Good Lord, leave the poor man alone, he isn't hurting anyone, and he seems to find comfort in having his wife close and keeping his promise of burying her at home. Losing his spouse of 48 years is terrible enough, let the man live in peace with the comfort that his wife is nearby.
That looks like a well built log cabin, it will be there for at least 75 years, longer if he used Cypress.
I don't see the problem here, provided that his wife was interred with all the appropriate laws obeyed. There is a reason why we put people in concrete vault. It's so that their decomposing corpse won't comtaminate the water supply. Not a bad idea when one is talking about this within city limits.
But if Mr. Davis put his lady wife in a sealed coffin within a concrete vault [or whatever the local laws require] then they should just leave him be.
 @svensson Concrete burial vaults have been known to leak and caskets will eventually decompose, even the steel ones. The primary reason to use the vaults is to allow recovery of the remains if a reason for such ever arises.
While I understand there could be some concerns in certain circumstances, it sounds like this man has buried his wife exactly the way she would have been buried in a cemetery, taking all due precautions.  He has built his beloved a lovely grave and it sustains him to see it there.
Â
Leave him alone. Decide these issues on a case by case basis. It's not like he dug a three foot hole and tossed her in there.
Â
Seems like life works out a whole lot better for everyone if people make most decisions based on their hearts instead of a piece of paper called "policy."
Always leave it to the big government to dictate what people do on their own property as usual. Guess it's a good thing I didn't let the city of Renton in on where I buried my cat.
@Zoso Or the city of Lake Stevens where I buried my horse!
Leave the poor man and deceased wife alone! It is HIS property and she wanted to be buried there. She ain't hurting no one by being there. Just looks like a flower garden to me.
Â
LEAVEÂ HER TO RIP.
Hope he never has a sewer or water leak. Oh wait! Probably doesn't have either.
 @Klondiko He lined her grave with concrete. No more risk than if she was in a cemetery where water lines and sewer lines also run around.Â
@Klondiko Apparenly you didn't read the part about this guy living in downtown?
 @keeper  @Klondiko It's a good point- Where do his lines run? What if he has to dig up, sewer, water, cable, telephone? Did he do the "call before you dig" thing?