Big Bird flies high in 2012 presidential campaign

NEW YORK (AP) - Big Bird is flying high in the 2012 presidential campaign.
President Barack Obama's campaign deployed the beloved "Sesame Street" icon in a new TV ad Tuesday mocking Mitt Romney for saying he would defund public broadcasting if elected.
The foundation backing "Sesame Street" quickly disavowed the spot, and Romney dismissed it as un-serious even though the Republican hopeful brought Big Bird into the national political conversation at last week's presidential debate.
Big Bird has been a big deal since Romney, in outlining ways he would cut federal spending, said, "I'm going to stop the subsidy to PBS," adding, "I like PBS, I love Big Bird."
Romney's vow to de-fund public broadcasting has been a staple of his campaign appearances for months, but the nationally televised declaration last week in Denver - more than 67 million were watching - gave it a much broader audience than ever before.
Romney's comment drew immediate reaction on social media, with users posting online photos of Big Bird appearing down on his luck or searching for work. Mock Big Birds have followed Romney to campaign events, and the real Big Bird even made an appearance on "Saturday Night Live" last weekend.
"I feel like I'm famous now. I was walking down the street the other day and felt like everyone recognized me," Big Bird said.
The "Sesame Street" dis offered an opening to Obama, who has faced strong backlash for his widely panned debate performance. At rallies and campaign appearances every day since the debate, he has used Romney's remark and referenced other "Sesame Street" characters to mock his opponent in a way audiences find funny and relatable.
"He said he'd bring down our deficit by going after what has been the biggest driver of our debt and deficits over the last decade - public television, PBS," Obama told people at a fundraiser Monday in San Francisco. "Elmo has been seen in a white Suburban. He's driving for the border. Oscar is hiding out in his trashcan. We're cracking down on them."
The satiric Obama campaign ad, set to air on national broadcast and cable stations, echoes that theme. The ad shows images of convicted financiers including Bernie Madoff and Enron's Ken Lay, and suggests Romney believes Big Bird is responsible for their crimes.
"Big, yellow, a menace to our economy," the ad says. "Mitt Romney knows it's not Wall Street you have to worry about, it's Sesame Street."
While Romney's comment drew criticism from PBS the day after the debate, the Sesame Workshop, which supports "Sesame Street" and other public broadcasting shows, demanded that Obama's campaign remove the ad.
"Sesame Workshop is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization and we do not endorse candidates or participate in political campaigns," the organization said in a terse, two-sentence statement. "We have approved no campaign ads and, as is our general practice, have requested that the ad be taken down."
Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt said the campaign was reviewing the organization's concerns.
Romney, campaigning in Iowa, dismissed the Big Bird ad as inconsequential and suggested Obama was focusing on trivial matters rather than the economy and high unemployment.
"These are tough times with real serious issues, so you have to scratch your head when the president spends the last week talking about saving Big Bird." Romney told a cheering crowd. "I actually think we need to have a president who talks about saving the American people and saving good jobs and saving our future."
With his newfound political celebrity, Big Bird has emerged as the latest star in a campaign proxy war over a larger policy issue.
In 2008, Joe Wurzelbacher, or "Joe the Plumber," set off a proxy battle over tax policy when he asked Obama about his tax plan for small business. Obama's videotaped reply, in which he told Wurzelbacher that "when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody," prompted Republican John McCain to seize the statement as evidence that Obama supported socialist tax policies. Obama doubled down on his argument that higher income earners should be taxed more than the middle class.
This year, Big Bird is serving as a central actor in the debate over federal spending in tough economic times.
Public broadcasting has long drawn the scorn of many conservatives who see it as wasteful and having a liberal bias. Romney has framed it as a fiscal issue, suggesting shows like "Sesame Street" should charge for advertising like other television stations and shouldn't depend on the federal government for support.
Obama, for his part, has tried to frame the controversy as a matter of conservative overreach, suggesting that Romney and others would cut funding for much-beloved children's programming while giving tax breaks to the wealthy.
PBS receives a portion of its funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which receives an annual appropriation from Congress. In 2012, CPB received $445 million in federal funding. PBS said in a news release after last week's presidential debate that public broadcasting receives about one-100th of 1 percent of the federal budget.
President Barack Obama's campaign deployed the beloved "Sesame Street" icon in a new TV ad Tuesday mocking Mitt Romney for saying he would defund public broadcasting if elected.
The foundation backing "Sesame Street" quickly disavowed the spot, and Romney dismissed it as un-serious even though the Republican hopeful brought Big Bird into the national political conversation at last week's presidential debate.
Big Bird has been a big deal since Romney, in outlining ways he would cut federal spending, said, "I'm going to stop the subsidy to PBS," adding, "I like PBS, I love Big Bird."
Romney's vow to de-fund public broadcasting has been a staple of his campaign appearances for months, but the nationally televised declaration last week in Denver - more than 67 million were watching - gave it a much broader audience than ever before.
Romney's comment drew immediate reaction on social media, with users posting online photos of Big Bird appearing down on his luck or searching for work. Mock Big Birds have followed Romney to campaign events, and the real Big Bird even made an appearance on "Saturday Night Live" last weekend.
"I feel like I'm famous now. I was walking down the street the other day and felt like everyone recognized me," Big Bird said.
The "Sesame Street" dis offered an opening to Obama, who has faced strong backlash for his widely panned debate performance. At rallies and campaign appearances every day since the debate, he has used Romney's remark and referenced other "Sesame Street" characters to mock his opponent in a way audiences find funny and relatable.
"He said he'd bring down our deficit by going after what has been the biggest driver of our debt and deficits over the last decade - public television, PBS," Obama told people at a fundraiser Monday in San Francisco. "Elmo has been seen in a white Suburban. He's driving for the border. Oscar is hiding out in his trashcan. We're cracking down on them."
The satiric Obama campaign ad, set to air on national broadcast and cable stations, echoes that theme. The ad shows images of convicted financiers including Bernie Madoff and Enron's Ken Lay, and suggests Romney believes Big Bird is responsible for their crimes.
"Big, yellow, a menace to our economy," the ad says. "Mitt Romney knows it's not Wall Street you have to worry about, it's Sesame Street."
While Romney's comment drew criticism from PBS the day after the debate, the Sesame Workshop, which supports "Sesame Street" and other public broadcasting shows, demanded that Obama's campaign remove the ad.
"Sesame Workshop is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization and we do not endorse candidates or participate in political campaigns," the organization said in a terse, two-sentence statement. "We have approved no campaign ads and, as is our general practice, have requested that the ad be taken down."
Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt said the campaign was reviewing the organization's concerns.
Romney, campaigning in Iowa, dismissed the Big Bird ad as inconsequential and suggested Obama was focusing on trivial matters rather than the economy and high unemployment.
"These are tough times with real serious issues, so you have to scratch your head when the president spends the last week talking about saving Big Bird." Romney told a cheering crowd. "I actually think we need to have a president who talks about saving the American people and saving good jobs and saving our future."
With his newfound political celebrity, Big Bird has emerged as the latest star in a campaign proxy war over a larger policy issue.
In 2008, Joe Wurzelbacher, or "Joe the Plumber," set off a proxy battle over tax policy when he asked Obama about his tax plan for small business. Obama's videotaped reply, in which he told Wurzelbacher that "when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody," prompted Republican John McCain to seize the statement as evidence that Obama supported socialist tax policies. Obama doubled down on his argument that higher income earners should be taxed more than the middle class.
This year, Big Bird is serving as a central actor in the debate over federal spending in tough economic times.
Public broadcasting has long drawn the scorn of many conservatives who see it as wasteful and having a liberal bias. Romney has framed it as a fiscal issue, suggesting shows like "Sesame Street" should charge for advertising like other television stations and shouldn't depend on the federal government for support.
Obama, for his part, has tried to frame the controversy as a matter of conservative overreach, suggesting that Romney and others would cut funding for much-beloved children's programming while giving tax breaks to the wealthy.
PBS receives a portion of its funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which receives an annual appropriation from Congress. In 2012, CPB received $445 million in federal funding. PBS said in a news release after last week's presidential debate that public broadcasting receives about one-100th of 1 percent of the federal budget.
The saddest thing about all of this is that so much attention is on Big Bird instead of Big Barry and his epic failure at the debate. Stuttering, staring blankly at his notes and looking lost is what should be remembered of our "fearless leader". And Mitt's vision and leadership abilities should be commended. This is exactly what the media wants people to be discussing. Anything to try to distract us from what really happened.
OBAMA NEEDS TO GO!!!! Anybody else who can get the illegals out of our country, scrap the socialist programs, scrap Ocrapcare, scrap stealing from one family to give to another. I am sick and tired of being forced to give my wealth away to another. That should be an individual's free choice not forced by the hands of our thieving government. I decide if I want to give money to charities or individuals - not you dear government. My happiness is not COLLECTIVE - SO QUIT forcing that crap on me too. Every mans happiness is in their own hands so don't be coming to me for YOUR HAPPINESS and I certainly wouldn't come to you. These stupid programs are what ails our once great country. You people want communism? You want that? Head your butt over to a communist country then and get the hell out of America.
445 million wasted tax and another program that doubled under Obama called the Lifeline program, which cost $1.6 billion in 2011, up from $772 million in 2008. While not technically a tax, the program is funded by mandatory fees tacked on to consumers' phone bills, then disbursed through the Federal Communications Commission and states.
I remember getting federal cheese but OBAMA is taxing my Phone bill to give out free phones to the poor.
 @Bill Bylthe Do you think the people of America should not help the poor?
Â
Giving them cell phones! Giving them Food Credit Cards that can be used to buy Cigarettes and booze... This does not help the poor this embarrasses the poor. I came from a poor family... federal cheese and the rest but as a child I went out and found any way to legally make a dime vs. having the government keep telling people don't worry we will take care of you cradle to grave. I am not talking about taking away short term safety nets our poor family immediately got off food stamps after we had enough to pay the bills but this type of Government mentality makes people too dependent.
@31F- IT SHOULD BE a PERSONAL CHOICE TO HELP WHO WE WANT TO HELP OR NOT HELP. Sick of the government "guilting" me into this crap. It is crap too. The government should not take from one man to give to another, that should be an individuals choice to do so and not guilted into it DOING IT - it's a dirty shame. Next thing you know they will take your land! The government are thieves! Altruism is crap!!! A human being should not ask me to give up my happiness for them and likewise. PHUCK COMMUNISM!!!! It is people like you that make me really sick. I'm an individual and my self esteem is not for sale as well as the fact that my happiness is NOT COLLECTIVE!
 @alildifferent "People like me... " I only asked a simple question.  Wow, I sincerely hope you don't have a heart attack or something...  take it easy.
I wonder we going sleep like Big Bird.
 I wonder sentence structure grammar.
Here's a novel idea I propose to BOTH parties, AND their "sheep"........how about y'all STOP talking about Sesame Street, and it's IMAGINARY characters, and FOCUS on REAL issues like homelessness, foreign policy, the budget, and unnecessary WARS? JUST like politicians to avoid anything SERIOUS during an election year, and use "weapons of mass distraction" to keep the sheeple otherwise occupied. WAKE THE HELL UP PEOPLE and pay attention to the REAL issues!
The number 1 cost for tax Payers should be to protect this Country and Americans. $445 Million could have paid for better Security against terror Attacks like the one in Libia. Emails and other comments from Officials  are pointing to refusals to provide security for the 4 dead Americans by Staff under Hillary. What is really sick is this BS line it was a protest that went bad when they knew it was a terror attack on September 12, 2012. Sound familiar? A Clinton running this and a cover up and no one in the Liberal Media is reporting this lie. A Piece of this $445 Million could have been used to protect our Foriegn Diplomats instead we are being told a lie in order to mask it long enough for someone to get elected. Â
 @Bill Bylthe When I was deployed, my entire Brigade (25th ID) used hummv's with canvas doors.  We were told to find scrap metal in Kuwait, and tie it to the sides of the vehicles for protection (i.e. more shrapnel).  This was under your beloved administration.  That is, one in which money went to defense.  Give me a break Mr. Blythe, your rants are baseless, faulty, and ill-informed.  Under GWB, funds were not protecting soldiers, diplomats, etc...Â
 @Bill Bylthe "The number 1 cost to tax payers should be to protect this country", interesting.  I served with many tax payers in Iraq who paid the ultimate sacrifice to protect this country.  Should that really be the number 1 cost?  I still wonder what me and the other soldiers I served with  were protecting.  Maybe, so you could spread trash about how much you hate your own country.  Oh I feel so proud :(
 @Bill Bylthe If you had watched Sesame Street, you would have learned how to spell words properly, by the way.Â
Â
Â
 @caphillkid Watching Sesame Street hows that working for you? Still not heard back any logic to explain why $445 Million for PBS when we have Americans Dying because someone is cutting Security Budget for our American Diplomats in Libya...
Or these super smart spellers running our country do not know how to make common sense decisions like ... If they bombed it before .....lets see will they bomb it again?
DAAAAAAAAAAAAA
History would have been changed if "Idiot" Clinton had not ignored the CIA 12 times while he was obsseesed with spewing his DNA all over the White House Walls. The Cia and Military had the chance 12 times during this "Idiots" terms to take out Bin Laden with Cruise missiles. Instead "Idiot" Clinton ignored them and  was more interested in signing NAFTA into Law that cost millions in lost Jobs and also
signing into law repealing the "Glass Steagall Act" which destroyed the housing market and caused millions of defaults on Mortgages. Â
 @Bill Bylthe  @caphillkid (Somewhat off-topic, and not really related to you at all, just having to do with financial stigma).. What kills me the most about all of the issues we are having with money being spent (federal/taxpayer or otherwise, is that it's STILL costing about $300 Million a DAY to keep soldiers in Iraq/Afghanistan. I am not saying that I want people to come to us and blast us instead of us being there, but I feel that if they had left it alone, or  maybe found some sort of other arrangement, then we would have not been in the massive debt that we are in now because of it. Bush and the like were worried about destroying our country, so he went to war.. to cause the economy to struggle, and possibly destroy it that way instead.
Â
Overall, the war(s) have costed 1.38 TRILLION dollars, and I can't see it being done anytime soon. $300 Million dollars a day is down from the around $720 Million a day ($500,000/minute) that we were spending at its peak.. It sure makes the $445 million sound like a blip on the map in comparison, doesn't it?Â
Â
(Disclaimer: This was not aimed at anyone in particular, I just read quite a bit about this earlier today, and it's ridiculous, it makes me almost ashamed to be an American when things are taken care of like this.)
Â
Â
/vent off
 @Bill Bylthe You can't even spell Libya...
 @caphillkid  @Bill Bylthe I guess the liberal medias spell checker did not find this along with you more worried about typos then the actual topic... Sounds like a Clinton "I speak and write so well" but so dumb and stupid I sign NAFTA into LAW that wipes out millions of jobs in America... Wait that is right Clinton never read NAFTA before he signed it... so all the proper speech and proper grammar in the world did not help this "Idiot" Clinton make a decision that had any thought to it... Its $445 Million of wasted Tax Payers money... you can spell it wrong but it still it rips off the Tax Payers when we have 100's of other areas that taxes should be spent on like Teachers and Schools.
 @Bill Bylthe Amen !!
This is another great lie from the low information conservatives.Â
Â
A fraction of PBS' operating budget comes from federal tax dollars.Â
Â
The amount of education that PBS provides to very young kids is something that just can't be measured.Â
Â
It's one of the easiest investments to make in our kids.
Â
That conservatives and Romney would even talk about ending funding to PBS is just insane and makes no logical sense.Â
Â
I find it quite telling that for someone who apparently won the debate, nobody remembers a single pro-Romney talking point or zinger from the debate. All that the American people have heard about is the stupid idea that you're going to fix our debt by going after PBS.
Â
And the scary thing is that plenty of people will come along here and make ridiculous statements like below mine simply because they don't know what the truth is nor do they care to learn about the truth. It's just all liberal bias blah blah blah...Â
Public Broadcasting, which receives an annual appropriation from Congress. In 2012, CPB received $445 million in federal funding. PBS said in a news release after last week's presidential debate. So BETH FOUHY from Associated Press / CPD and Congress are all Conservative Liars?
Â
$445 Million! that would pay for a lot of Teacher Salaries instead of Sucking Tax dollars We got CNN MSNBC and other Broadcasting companies that could absorb this $445 Million dollar theft of US Tax Dollars. Liberal George Soros has got Billions lets see if he is willing to buy PBS then we don't have this Liberal dribble being forced down our throats and we have to pay for it.  Â
 @Bill Bylthe Federal funding is like 15% of PBS' budget.
Â
Did you ever stop to think for a moment that PBS provides education to young kids BEFORE they even are old enough for school?
Â
Using the argument that we should stop funding educational TV so that we can hire more teachers is one of the worst arguments I've seen from anyone here.
 @caphillkid  @Gaikokujin Wow I am a conservative
who cares about the environment. I am against NAFTA which wipes
 out Union Jobs in Textile and Auto Industry to name a few. I voted for Obama last election and do not belong to any party. I was against a Governor who received huge campaign donations from Tyson foods so that they could dump raw feces into the Arkansas river. I use only LED lights and environmental safe products... And to top it off you offend and disgrace one of my hobbies of helping mentally challenged persons at the "Special Olympics"
you are a real piece of work
 @Gaikokujin This is one of the funniest series of posts I've read here. It's like the special olympics of conservative blogging.Â
 @aintno1special  @caphillkid  @Bill Bylthe Absolutely spot on !!
Yes Correct but what would save Tax Payer Money money is Have PBS sell to the parents a DVD of the their PBS shows... then the rest who read to their children and educate their children don't have to pay their tax dollars on top of buying the books and educational products they currently use.
 @Sutekh  @caphillkid  @Bill Bylthe Indirectly if he is defending the fact that tax dollars should continue to be directed to PBS because as he says "Did you ever stop to think for a moment that PBS provides education to young kids BEFORE they even are old enough for school?"...kind of makes that argument.
@Sutekh @aintno1special @caphillkid    Maybe caphillkid meant when he texted " Using the argument that we should stop funding educational TV so that we can hire more teachers is one of the worst arguments I've seen from anyone here." caphillkid must have made a Typo :)
 @aintno1special  @caphillkid  @Bill Bylthe "I'm sorry but making an argument that TV needs to be there to educate our children VS qualified teachers is one of the worst, although overly accepted "norm", arguments I have seen from anyone here."
Â
Then it's a good thing that caphillkid wasn't actually making that argument, isn't it?
 @caphillkid  @Bill Bylthe Here's a great idea...instead of being a parent and taking time to actually teach you kid yourself before they go to school...rely on Sesame Street to do it for you.
Â
I'm sorry but making an argument that TV needs to be there to educate our children VS qualified teachers is one of the worst, although overly accepted "norm", arguments I have seen from anyone here.
Read the article again Corporation for Public Broadcasting recieved $445 Million a half a Billion dollars! that money could be going for schools and teachers. IF PBS is that good then lets see someone buy it instead of using  TAX Dollars to Fund it. This Country is in Massive Debt stated when "Idiot" Clinton signed repeal of the "Glass Steagal Act" in 1997  removing regulation checks and Balances  so Banks could not Buy/Sell Mortgages Wall STreet style and forced Banks to Not allow Mortgages to be funded for people who could not make the Payment. This "Idiot" Clinton put us in this Mess and the only way to fix it is tighten the free give aways and Repeal "NAFTA" another stupid law that "Idiot Clinton signed into Law that destroyed this economy.
This is a waste of Tax Dollars! That money could be going to pay for more teachers. So Big Bird! get one of your Liberal loving deep Pocket suporters to fund you or start a small business and stop sucking USTax dollars.
Obama, who failed to honor his 2008 campaign pledge to fix NAFTA with the dems controlling the Senate Obama's first 2 years is harping about this when he needs to start doing what he said he would do.
There are Foriegn Children slave labor companies dumping cheaper product threw Canada and Mexico
via That "Idiot" Clinton signing NAFTA into Law and allowing this Non-Environmental Asian and Non US companies to destroy the enviroment and expose the workers to deadly work environments. Before you respond I voted for OBAMA and I am not a republican or democrat.
  Â