KOMO investigators uncover more problems with Kiewit Construction
»Play Video
SEATTLE -- Drinking on the job, leaks and cracks with the new 520 Bridge pontoons, and now the Problem Solvers have uncovered alleged construction flaws at Safeco Field and with the iconic Bay Bridge in California.
All of the problems lead back to the contractor in charge of the most expensive construction project in state history: rebuilding the 520 bridge. Kiewit Construction has been at the center of our ongoing Problem Solver investigation into allegations of shoddy, even potentially dangerous work on the 520 bridge.
The KOMO 4 Problem Solvers have now learned that the California legislature has launched its own investigation because of major questions about Kiewit's construction of the iconic Bay Bridge.
When the destructive Loma Prieta earthquake hit California's Bay area in 1989, bridges became a tragic and visible weakness, including the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, a critical lifeline for the region.
Twenty-three years later, the new east span under construction is designed to withstand another major earthquake. But one year away from the Bay Bridge completion, Sacramento Bee Investigative Reporter Charles Piller has uncovered critical questions about the safety of its construction and the primary contractor - Kiewit Construction.
"There is a big uncertainty left in the structural stability of that bridge," Piller said.
In particular, uncertainties about the stability of the single high tower that stabilizes the span's west end. Thirteen concrete piles form the base of that tower -- concrete that required testing. But when Piller went looking, half of the test reports were missing. Only after Piller started asking questions were the test results released.
He says one test was never found and another showed serious flaws.
"Olson Engineering found a massive section of what appears to be unset concrete," he said. "The key question is - why did Kiewit withhold that report?"
Additionally, Piller says California's Department of Transportation - CalTrans - has now uncovered test problems with two other piles, meaning four of the 13 structural elements Kiewit built are question marks.
"And what we have in the Bay Bridge and the tower foundation are now four problems that are critical problems," he said.
Other problems found
"Tell us what we got for six and a half billion dollars," California State Senator Mark DeSaulnier said following the Bee's investigation.
DeSaulnier has called for California's legislative analyst office to review the concerns about the Bay Bridge safety and Kiewit Construction.
"If they have hidden information in the testing, if they've failed the testing, that's what the extra investigation that we are going through right now hopefully will find out for us," he said.
But Kiewit also had problems with foundations for another California structure. Piller says CalTrans rejected nearly 80 percent of the concrete piles Kiewit built for the Benicia Martinez Bridge.
"That is a level of quality that is so far below the norm for building these kinds of structures, that you have to ask yourself why were they hired?" he said.
So are there parallels between the construction problems in California and other public projects Kiewit is building in Washington state?
Long before Kiewit started work on the 520 project, they were the general contractor building Safeco Field -- home of the Seattle Mariners. But in 2006, the Mariners sued Kiewit for $3 million, alleging construction defects -- problems with the paint meant to preserve the steel beams. That suit is under appeal. Just last week on another local construction job - contractor Kiewit announced problems with the planned opening of the new South Park Bridge: it will now be delayed until 2014, causing additional hardship for area businesses and residents.
With the 520 Bridge pontoons, a Problem Solver investigation uncovered dozens of hours of videotape inspections inside the massive concrete structures, revealing that all six of the first pontoons built in Aberdeen have leaked. One video inspection noted rebar on the outside of one pontoon is already rusting where it was exposed to seawater.
We obtained thousands of pages of internal documents through the public records act: The records detailed the extensive cracking and that many of the crack repairs, "are brittle and have already failed." The records note that critical rebar in three of the biggest pontoons is,"missing", that the contractor opted to, "proceed at risk," in spite of that, and two of WSDOT's own engineers found that it was, "not structurally acceptable." In fact one engineer wrote that Kiewit is, "taking a huge gamble with a critical public asset."
California's State Senator DeSaulnier: "With the concrete and the pilings - specific to your project? There's a pattern there."
Late Monday, Kiewit responded by e-mail saying it, "firmly stand behind the safety and quality of work we've done on the many bridges we've built in North America, including the SR-520 pontoon bridge and those you reference in California." Kiewit adds that they also, "take any quality issues associated with the SR-520 project very seriously." And, "we are committed to delivering a safe, high-quality final product."
Why can't the state fire this company, sue them for all the wasted money, and start over with a company that knows what they're doing?
Why is KOMO the only one who thinks there is a conspiracy. Here is another positive story about the repairs and condition of the pontoons ! http://kxro.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/520-pontoons-still-in-good-condition/
Â
 @Hugh Jardon Do you work for Kiewit Construction or something?
Please read the attached Seattle Times article to get a realistic story about the bridge pontoons. KOMO is not providing fair and balanced reporting. http://seattletimes.com/text/2019676918.html
Ah yes! And for another stellar example of Kiewit's quality concrete work, check out the severely cracked floors on the new Sound Transit Administration building where they store and maintain the light rail vehicles. When engineering and politics are mixed together on large public projects, the public's interests in quality work goes out the window.
KOMO, you should report the news honestly. Admit that the Sacramento Bee allegations have been dismissed by the Caltrans Director of Transportation and the Governor. Read about it ....http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2012/06/caltrans-new-bay-bridge-safe-well-tested?category=1530. You may as well have a National Inquirer reporter interview a Globe Magazine reporter about martians invading the Soviet Union.Â
Â
Another great reminder folks. Get out there and vote for change in this state today. Lets send Governor Kiewit out in style!
Why did Kiewit get the project? Â There may be numerous reasons. Â But at the end of the day, it likely comes down to who had the lowest price.Â
Â
It is not so much a question of who has the best or most honest reputation (They'd be hiring Lewis or GLY then) or who can orchestrate and deliver on a large project (Sellen Co.), it comes down to the 'cheapest price'.Â
Â
This sounds like a situation where Egg is on the face of both Kiewit and the State DOT. Â Both have (again, I say *apparently*) Â failed to do their jobs properly. Â Â
There's a slew of information pertaining to the 520 Pontoon replacement project by the DOT here:Â http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/biz/contaa/DESIGNBUILDCONTRACTS/SR520BRIDGEREPLACEMENT/Â
Â
No worries...Jay Inslee will fix the problem! <wink...wink>
 @Oppenheimer baseless opportunism. On your part.
My dad use to say, "You get what you pay for." Having worked for the state I know first hand that the state bureaucracy will accept bids based on little or no knowledge of what is being bid on, thus, end up with a shoddy product that they did not know was shoddy until someone like myself or someone on the outside like KOMO News discovered the problems.  And then the excuses and denials by the idiots who accepted the bids start rolling in and the smokescreen is put into place to fool state legislators into providing more money. My personal experience was on a multimillion dollar database that is still not being used after twenty years because no one knew what the were doing and still don't.
I wonder if KOMO 4Â Problem Solvers will have the same results as it did with their "waste on the water" ferry system stories had, absolutely none?
Looks to me like the state needs to start over, new contractor, new management within dept of transportation. Clean house a little and then move forward using the contractor that provides the best product.
The most extensive build for WA paid for by us by the lowest bidder!... Olympia get your head out of your rears and looks at the track record! screw the lobbyists money that may have gotten POOWIT the contract and remember you work for the people of WA state who will use this darn thing!...sounds seriously like this company is gambling that lawsuits will be cheaper than building it right... if they stand so well behind their project how about their EXECUTIVES hold a 24/7/365 hour vigil on the California bridge until the next big one hits and same for the 520 bridge to see if it sinks.. if they are confident they should not mind being strapped to the thing for 'testing'!
So they also did the bridge from I-90 to the Samamish plateau. Â That going to fall down too? Â Has anyone taken a look at it? Â
 @Sherry Chambers As I recall they didn't do a very good job stabilizing the hill and as a result lost a decent amount of concrete work for the on ramp coming off the hill. Â
It's not capitalism. It's inefficient and corrupt government, a government too inefficient to manage. Just think of what will happen with "Obamacare" IF it stays.
 @Maria de los Angeles I just love how you seem to think "Obamacare" has anything to do with a major construction project. Politics season... gotta love it.
There are some good things about Obamacare... (just a few,...very few...)
So its ok for companies to be corrupt but not government? They both go hand in hand. One can't be corrupt without the other. Should be jail time for any government worker who covers up a corrupt business and should be HUGE fines for any business caught trying to corrupt government officials along with jail time for the CEO. @Maria de los Angeles
 @Maria de los Angeles Yeah.. Just think!
Â
..wait...... what, will happen... exactly?
Just the nature of capitalism. Also an example of why free market capitalism can never exist. If they think they can get away with it they cut corners every time. Got to keep them profits up. Then you have the DOT employees and others who cover up for them for  a little pocket change. The government has got to start having meaningful fines that make this cutting corners very expensive for the contractors. On the 520 bridge start the fines at $1 million for each pontoon not done correctly.
 @Blindman What do you mean that free market capitalism cannot exist?  Accountability is happening right-as-we-speak!   Kiewit may end up going out of business in the State or the US, never to do business again.   That's free-market-accountability for you, and as it should be.   May the *best* guy win, not the most dishonest.
@Vertically Inclined, can you please state you source for "Kiewit may end up going out of business in the State or the US". http://kiewit.com/locations.aspx
 @Vertically Inclined  @Blindman I think Blindman's point might have been that the fact that the government would have to crack down on a private company due to shoddy work is often seen as an example of the government meddling in free-market affairs. It's a common mantra in the whole "free market economy" argument. Though in this case, since the government itself is the customer of this company, I don't think that particular argument stands here.
There definitely are better ways to select a contractor. But these big contractors are at the top of the game. They donate to politicians big time. There are none better arguing their cases in court. They donate to judge races. Top level department leaders are often donators or other cronies of governors, etc. For sure, such highly skilled contractors make sure the State buys off on every move prior to making that move. So, WSDOT approved the materials, the mix design, the move from Aberdeen to Seattle, all along the way the contractor surely sought and received State approval. Better to have China built it and shipped them here with the gov and her designee inside to check for leaks on the way over. LOL
So you know this from first hand experience? Nice try.
She may not have firsthand experience in this but I do and she is right on the money. How about you?
With Kiewit's army of attorneys and the State's army of newbie law graduates, I wonder who would win in court. What they should have done is what the did with the Narrows Bridge and the San Francisco bridge: have it built in China and shipped here. It would also have given the PRA employment too. ;-)
@Maria de los Angeles Guess who built the Narrow's Bridge???? Wait for it??? Kiewit. I'm not a Kiewit sympathizer by any stretch, but research facts before you talk.
 @Maria de los Angeles Pretty obvious their tactic is to lawyer up, the Safeco case is 6-yrs old and under appeal. Meanwhile has the issue been resolved? Can you imagine what kind of delays and safety issues could be held up in court for years to come? I really hope the Governor steps up and puts an end to this nonsense.
 @Maria de los Angeles To hell with taking them to court. With the way they are playing with peoples' lives, we need to take them out behind the woodshed and teach them a life lesson.
Governer Gregoire, I voted for you twice. Where is your leadership on this? Â Where? Â this contract needs to be ended, and Kiewet needs to be replaced. Period. Â Do something!
 @MPS Are you joking? She doesn't care, she has no election to try to win so why would she step in here?Â
 @MPS 2 x fail vote.
When the new bridge opens, you won't ever see my car on it.
Â
Hey Governor, do something about this please? Fire the useless waste of air and get someone responsible in there.
OH, and when the bridge fails later, they better sue Kiewit for every last penny and then some.
The problem is from the top down. Paula Hammond has run the state DOT into the ground. Her fiasco with the Nalley Valley project, the State Ferry system, and now 520. The continued problems will not be fixed until she is relieved of her duties. Since she is a crony of the current state administration, lets hope that her time is about to end.
Paula Hammond wasnt qualified for the job in the beginning and these epic failures show she still isnt. Governor Gregoire needs to put political niceties aside and not worry about who/what the incoming governor wants to do with DOT. She needs to fire Hammond immediately before any more damage is done & suspend Kiewit's contract pending further investigation. Let the chips fall where they may & let Jay Inslee prove his mettle by fixing this mess ASAP.
@EMDF9A that contract needs to be flat out cancelled... If they deliver the items without defects, then DOT should accept them.. if they have defects, reject them, and let Kiewit replace them at their cost... that would put a damper on how sloppy they are..
Did anyone read the Seattle Times post regarding the 520 bridge? Quite interesting. http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2019593025_pontoons03m.html.
@andrewsfam I did and posted on it. The times quickly buried their article and the posts and still are suppressing locating the article. Go on their website and search for "pontoons".
That's it.... Take them to court and seize every asset they own! Shut them down.....
 @Funky-Munky ...unfortunately, Paula & Christine will bow this off, like the drinking uncovered...no big deal to them.Â
They may feign anger or concern about the safety aspect, but in a good faith attempt to keep the project on track, they will not care in the end.
AS far as how much more this will cost the tax payers...10's of billions perhaps to correct the errors, that really does not matter.....might come with a new slogan even...
"520 tolls....2078 sound good"
 @Sydthepiper Ugh! :(
Lowest price and trumped up qualifications does not a good contractor make. Even all of the State's calling on references and reviewing of of past projects of the same likliness can a good decision be based. Some of these contractors just know how to play the game and have been doing it so long they are practically a shoe in to win the contract. This is a very large contractor. They have been around the block more times than not. They know how to work the system.
If the state continues with this contractor then they are to blame just as much as anyone.
Oh, you silly state law. These sorts of contracts MUST go to the lowest bidder?
Â
I'd rather look at reviews and past work, and hire the best REGARDLESS of price. To me, if you have a superior end product that you KNOW you'll have for the long haul, it's worth every extra penny.
Â
@WAbornnraised I think that prevailing wages needs to be eliminated as well.
 @WAbornnraised Actually the requirement is for the lowest cost "qualified" bidder. People should expect to see more time and effort in studying the "quality" of the bidder not just the final price, which never is the final price anyway.