EU fines Microsoft $733 million for breaking browser pact

AMSTERDAM (AP) - The European Union has fined Microsoft €561 million ($733 million) for breaking a pledge to offer personal computer users a choice of Internet browsers when they install the company's flagship Windows operating system.
The penalty imposed by the EU's executive arm, the Commission, is a first for Brussels: no company has ever failed to keep its end of a bargain with EU authorities before.
In 2009, Microsoft Corp. struck a broad settlement with the Commission to resolve disputes over the company's abuse of the dominance of Windows, which had spanned more than a decade.
Back then, the company agreed to pay €860 million and promised to give Windows users the option of choosing another browser rather than having Microsoft's Internet Explorer automatically installed on their machines.
But Microsoft failed to stick to the deal for some 15 million installations of Windows 7 software in Europe from May 2011 until July 2012. The company admitted the failure last year, adding that it was a mistake.
The Commission's top competition regulator, Joaquin Almunia, said at a press conference in Brussels, Belgium, Wednesday that the fine reflected the size of the violation and the length of time it went on for. It was also intended to make an example of Microsoft and deter other companies from doing same thing. In theory, the commission could have fined Microsoft up to 10 percent of its global annual sales during the period the violation took place.
"A failure to comply is a very serious infringement that must be sanctioned accordingly," Almunia said.
Keith Hylton, a professor of law and antitrust specialist at Boston University said the fine was "far in excess of any benefit Microsoft could have gotten from the error, and vastly in excess of any harm to EU consumers, who are all aware of alternatives to Internet Explorer."
In all, Microsoft has now paid €2.2 billion in fines to the Commission since 1998, when regulators opened their first investigations into the company after Sun Microsystems complained it had been denied access to technical documents. Over the years, the EU has broadened its investigation to include whether Microsoft had abused Window's near-monopoly over the market for computer operating systems to corner other markets, including server software, streaming media software, and Internet browsers.
Anthony Sabino, an antitrust lawyer and professor at St. John's University, said the Commission was right to fine Microsoft for the latest lapse, but the size of the penalty seemed "disproportionate...perhaps even petty, given that Microsoft has paid its fines and yielded to all the demands of the EU."
"They have been slow to acknowledge that, while powerful, Microsoft is not invincible," he said.
Sabino added that Microsoft may be paying the price in part for its aggressiveness in the past in testing the limits of what regulators will tolerate.
Given the length of time the latest violation went on, and the number of users affected, "it does strain credibility" that Microsoft wouldn't have known it had failed to keep its part of the agreement, Sabino added.
For its part, Microsoft was apologetic.
"We take full responsibility for the technical error that caused this problem and have apologized for it," the company said in a statement. "We provided the Commission with a complete and candid assessment of the situation, and we have taken steps ... to help avoid this mistake - or anything similar - in the future."
Microsoft's Internet Explorer still has a 56 percent market share for Internet browsers on personal computers, according to statistics by Net Applications. Mozilla's Firefox has 20 percent while Google's Chrome has a 17 percent share. Microsoft is required to continue to offer consumers a choice of browsers through 2014.
But the wider competitive landscape has changed greatly since the Commission started its action against Microsoft. Software applications on mobile phones usually bypass browsers entirely. Tech companies are now often less concerned with Internet browsers and more concerned about Google Inc.'s dominance in Internet search technology, Facebook's dominance in social networking, and Apple's dominance on mobile devices.
"For technology companies, often the best policeman is technological progress itself," Sabino said.
Rather than imposing unilateral fines, Almunia has advocated negotiated settlements since he took over as commissioner in 2010. He believes that competition issues are best resolved quickly and that slapping big fines on companies years after the fact does little to help consumers.
But he said the whole point of a settlement is undermined when companies then don't abide by its terms.
"They must do what they committed to do, or face the consequences," he said.
Almunia conceded that the Commission had been "naive" in appointing Microsoft itself to oversee compliance with the agreement, and said the Commission won't allow that in the future.
The penalty imposed by the EU's executive arm, the Commission, is a first for Brussels: no company has ever failed to keep its end of a bargain with EU authorities before.
In 2009, Microsoft Corp. struck a broad settlement with the Commission to resolve disputes over the company's abuse of the dominance of Windows, which had spanned more than a decade.
Back then, the company agreed to pay €860 million and promised to give Windows users the option of choosing another browser rather than having Microsoft's Internet Explorer automatically installed on their machines.
But Microsoft failed to stick to the deal for some 15 million installations of Windows 7 software in Europe from May 2011 until July 2012. The company admitted the failure last year, adding that it was a mistake.
The Commission's top competition regulator, Joaquin Almunia, said at a press conference in Brussels, Belgium, Wednesday that the fine reflected the size of the violation and the length of time it went on for. It was also intended to make an example of Microsoft and deter other companies from doing same thing. In theory, the commission could have fined Microsoft up to 10 percent of its global annual sales during the period the violation took place.
"A failure to comply is a very serious infringement that must be sanctioned accordingly," Almunia said.
Keith Hylton, a professor of law and antitrust specialist at Boston University said the fine was "far in excess of any benefit Microsoft could have gotten from the error, and vastly in excess of any harm to EU consumers, who are all aware of alternatives to Internet Explorer."
In all, Microsoft has now paid €2.2 billion in fines to the Commission since 1998, when regulators opened their first investigations into the company after Sun Microsystems complained it had been denied access to technical documents. Over the years, the EU has broadened its investigation to include whether Microsoft had abused Window's near-monopoly over the market for computer operating systems to corner other markets, including server software, streaming media software, and Internet browsers.
Anthony Sabino, an antitrust lawyer and professor at St. John's University, said the Commission was right to fine Microsoft for the latest lapse, but the size of the penalty seemed "disproportionate...perhaps even petty, given that Microsoft has paid its fines and yielded to all the demands of the EU."
"They have been slow to acknowledge that, while powerful, Microsoft is not invincible," he said.
Sabino added that Microsoft may be paying the price in part for its aggressiveness in the past in testing the limits of what regulators will tolerate.
Given the length of time the latest violation went on, and the number of users affected, "it does strain credibility" that Microsoft wouldn't have known it had failed to keep its part of the agreement, Sabino added.
For its part, Microsoft was apologetic.
"We take full responsibility for the technical error that caused this problem and have apologized for it," the company said in a statement. "We provided the Commission with a complete and candid assessment of the situation, and we have taken steps ... to help avoid this mistake - or anything similar - in the future."
Microsoft's Internet Explorer still has a 56 percent market share for Internet browsers on personal computers, according to statistics by Net Applications. Mozilla's Firefox has 20 percent while Google's Chrome has a 17 percent share. Microsoft is required to continue to offer consumers a choice of browsers through 2014.
But the wider competitive landscape has changed greatly since the Commission started its action against Microsoft. Software applications on mobile phones usually bypass browsers entirely. Tech companies are now often less concerned with Internet browsers and more concerned about Google Inc.'s dominance in Internet search technology, Facebook's dominance in social networking, and Apple's dominance on mobile devices.
"For technology companies, often the best policeman is technological progress itself," Sabino said.
Rather than imposing unilateral fines, Almunia has advocated negotiated settlements since he took over as commissioner in 2010. He believes that competition issues are best resolved quickly and that slapping big fines on companies years after the fact does little to help consumers.
But he said the whole point of a settlement is undermined when companies then don't abide by its terms.
"They must do what they committed to do, or face the consequences," he said.
Almunia conceded that the Commission had been "naive" in appointing Microsoft itself to oversee compliance with the agreement, and said the Commission won't allow that in the future.
I have to ask myself; Windows is owned by Microsoft, and Microsoft isn't headquartered in the EU. Therefore, why in the Hell would Microsoft care about what the EU wants? Unless you're hopeless with computers, you can simply add Firefox or Chrome into your system and make it the default for browsing...Even the French should be able to do that... my mind, she is blown!
EU I am holding my middle finger up for you!
It seem like everytime you turn around they are being slapped with a fine in Europe.
I'm surprised they even to business over there.
Joaquin Almunia looks like the human equivalent of the grumpy cat neme.
And Y does this country want to have any thing to do with the UN/EU if we don't write them a check they find other ways. Just ask Boeing too. Is this Microsoft second or third hit by the EU
It seems that Service Pack 1 for Windows 7 clobbered the browser choice screen required by the EU sanctions. Somebody in Redmond (likely several somebodies) got super, duper fired for that one.Â
But at this point I question the relevance of the ruling. Anyone with enough awareness to think, "You know what? IE sucks!" knows that alternatives exist. Anyone browsing the Web with IE is going to get offered Chrome or Firefox on a regular basis, and both browsers are commonly bundled with all sorts of freeware programs. Honestly, you have to be diligent NOT to get a second browser installed on your PC.
How's that new currency working out for you, EU?
@Poisonous GiraffeÂ
1 Euro is currently worth $1.299 on the currency markets. That's way above it's all-time low in 2002 of 84 American cents. So, it appears to be holding up thus far, despite many predictions of collapse over the years.Â
@Whobeke @Poisonous GiraffeÂ
Good point. I remember some discussion and speculation last year that maybe the EU thought it was a mistake to consolidate their currency.
Wait, so Microsoft must allow the choice of another browser, but why dont I get the choice of Chrome on my iPhone when updating to a new iOS? Or what about if I want to install Lion on my Mac, I only get the default Safari. And I am curious, do the Chromebooks allow you to choose IE, Chrome, or Firefox? Why doesnt only Microsoft have to comply with this?
@Kiara Because they are the biggest and they have the most money to settle with ... the EU is broke so they looking to get what they can from whomever they can.....honestly... it is not that hard to install an alternate themselves... I do and have done so already! EU just is out to get money nothing more!
EU always want our money,especially now they are so broke.
But,we can do the same,slap them with heavier import taxes on French Wines,
BMW or M.BENZ etc., don't let those damn OLD EUROPE get away !
@scychan California and Washington wines are good enough for me.Â
I wasn't surprised when IE was on the computer I bought. I used it to download Firefox. :o)
The EU is so broke they grab anything anywhere they can to bolster their finances.
I'm reading the comments below and it seems a lot of you fail to understand that Microsoft agreed to do this as an anti-monopoly gesture to do business in the EU. Again, they agreed to this. They broke their own agreement and got fined.Â
@lakeview "Well, Your Honor, the guy AGREED to give me his wallet, so it was a mutual contract. Sure, I had the gun but he AGREED. He said, 'Here, take it!,' so I did.
@Getov Mylon Like it or not, if Microsoft wants to sell their products in a certain country, they have to abide by that country's rules and regs. There has been plenty of anti-trust action taken against Microsoft here in our country as well. Not saying it is right or wrong, but they agreed to these regulations in the EU.Â
@lakeview @Getov Mylon I agree in regards of if MS wants to sell, then they need to abide by the rules. However the EU would probably sue if MS decided to skip the EU when releasing the next version of Windows (as an example)
@lakeview True, they did agree to this a decade or so ago and yes they should be fined for breaking their commitment. Although, 733 million seems a bit excessive, especially nowadays where there is lots of good competition in the browser market. The 733 million seems more like a money grab on the part of the EU than a reasonable punishment for a company that isn't even producing the best browser anymore. Â
$733 million for preloading browser on their product? If someone is so against IE, why can't they just go download another browser? It takes less than 10 minutes.Â
So this fine essentially says they can sue Microsoft for loading anything onto its OS that has a competing company. Microsoft is a private company that should have its say in what it ships. It appears Europe thinks it is necessary to play the nanny role.
So people need a choice of which browser to use, because they don't know how to type www.firefox.com to install firefox?
I didn't realize that IE has special powers that makes the user forget that other browsers exist & can install them with no problems.  I must be special to be able to block IE's evil power.
I also "love" the photo of him looking like he's pouting like a little b****
@choliscott Well actually it is true. A lot of people haven't even heard of Firefox, and are not even aware that IE exists. They just use the "internet" with whatever is there. And usually it's more like, "check my e-mail" and "read the news". They know that's on the internet, but might not be fully aware of the browser part of it or that there are other options, especially when you are talking about the cattle herds that are the European mass.  That said, it is a little odd that cell phones and Apples are allowed to ship with proprietary browsers, but Windows is not. Seems like a double standard.
@choliscott They don't even have to type www. ;)
Revenue for just the Windows biz in last 2  fiscal quarters:
Q1 2013 Windows : $3.24 billion, a 33% decrease from the prior year period.Â
Q2 2013 Windows : $5.88 billion, a 24% increase from the prior year period.
Yeah that .73 Billion will just kill them. I sure hope the lesson was well learned.Â
WOW. 12.5% of one whole quarter's revenue of one division.Â
MS will somehow have to survive on what's left of the measly $21.46 BILLION Revenue for that quarter. Better cut back on the towel service.
Lessee, MS grosses $20 Billion or so per quarter, so call it $80 Billion/yr. $733 million out of $80 Billion... less than 1% Yup. That'll teach em a lesson. Â Yawn
I agree with Poisonous Giraffe in that we should not expect competitor products on one system when we get it from another company. It's easy to customize after the fact if one knows what they are doing. Obviously the EU does not know how to do this. Leave Microsoft alone, the future will govern what the company does and how it acts for them if they do not remain current. The EU just sees Microsoft as cash flow for them since the economies of Europe are in the crapper any way.
How about we fine Europe (double for the French) for being so stoopid that they can't figure out how to download an alternate browser? The Dark Ages make so much more sense now.
@Getov Mylon You do realize MS was sued for the very same thing in the US right?
@Lrry*x*K @Getov Mylon Then we should punish ourselves for being so stoopid. Some people should not be allowed near a computer. Like I was telling the Princess from Nigeria that I send a few bucks to so she can get her emigration papers and then we can share $14,000,000 once the Barrister Obuongo releases the funds. Some people...
this is so dumb... oh no.. MICROSOFT put MICROSOFT IE on MICROSOFT windows.. what a shocker! Pretty sure when you get a new mac, you dont get the option of installing safari or chrome.
So instead of the EU trying to spur competition inside its borders to create a replacement for Microsoft products they instead levy huge fines against foreigners. A lot of people compare Europeans quality of life in comparison to Americans, I mean we have heard for years on end how great most of the European health care is compared to America and how great the social services are, like how much time a lot of European woman get away from the work force on paid leave to have children and still have their job when they decide to come back to work. And what about their guaranteed retirement plans paid for by the countries they live in. I would think all of this would just make the best damned worker in the world that is âfaster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, and able to leap tall buildings in a single boundâ. But no, all we get from the EU is anti competition fines levied because they know they can not compete on a level playing ground with the rest of the world. How many operating systems have actually came from the EU? Linux is all I can think of and they give that away. Don't get me wrong, I have used Linux many times and still run it for certain tasks but I would never try to run a for profit business on it and based on the acceptance of Linux not many other people are to.
"They must do what they committed to do, or face the consequences," he said.
Time for.. da-da-DAH... The COMFY CHAIR!
Mr. Mylon wishes to apologize for making forty- year-old "comedy" references. Now get back to work ya whippersnappers.
A choice of what browser you use is a good thing. I haven't used microsoft windows for years now. I'm more than happy with my Mac. Very few if any problems when compared the error prone PC.  No plans of  ever going back to the PC
@HallandOates What does this have to do with anything? And doesn't Mac come preloaded with Safari? Europe, under this argument, would be able to fine them based on forcing people to use Safari on their products. Good for you and your love of Mac's, but your personal preference has no relevance to this article. All a user needs to do is type in firefox.com and they'll have a new browser in a few minutes.
I don't understand this.... When I buy a new car, say, a Ford.. I get a Ford engine. I don't get a Chevy, or an Audi engine, and I am right to not expect it.
As far as I know, If I am making a product specific to my company, there's no damned way I would throw in bits from a competitor, and no one should rightfully expect me to.
Difficult to know whether this is arrogance or stupidity, but with Ballmer in charge it's quite likely both.
Honestly I am supportive of Microsoft, initially they were given the choice of installing other browsers or no browser at all, and they chose no browser at all and were ordered to change that to multiple browsers. They first abided by the ruling and were told no, and that was BS
Dude, it's 2013! People are still using IE?!? Good grief, talk about beating a dinosaur.
@Bianca I know it's not trendy to use, but it's still a very capable browser with advantages and disadvantages to other browsers. Do you know much about browsers? If you did, you wouldn't be using "dinosaur" as a reference for a product that still is continuously updated. Browser performance is still incredibly close. I might give a slight edge to Chrome, but it's not by much.
@Paddy @BiancaFrom a web developer's perspective, IE10 is by far the closest to being standards compliant. If you MUST use IE, make sure it's 10.
Microsoft is just a company to loot for these Europeans. It has nothing to do with "protecting" consumers. Downloading and running Chrome or Firefox just takes a few minutes of effort. Something even an EU apparatchik could accomplish.
There is no more money in the EU for the lawyers to go after so now its time to try and squeeze money from foreign companies. What a sad little place western Europe has become. Guess that's why I don't vacation there anymore. Oh and to @rightandexact WTF try and focus on the topic at hand. I know why they treated you like an idiot. You ramble incoherently about random crap. Focus young grasshopper............
@Ghost1518You are so verbally tough, I would love to become awesome at verbal judo like you. It was just wishful thinking on my end, hoping a fine of $733 million would put a substantial dent in Microsoft's wallet and they would have to downsize- but I know that won't happen anytime soon. An when did it become a problem to voice my opinion? You seem to have no problem yapping about your opinions.......................
I understand Europe is in mourning right now at the prospect of not receiving tourism business from you. I hope you're happy now.
If anything they should pay Microsoft for making IE so crappy that no one actually wants to use it except for people who don't know better.
The EU is just after money, Microsoft's browser is down to 3rd place just by it's self with no EU intervention.
2013    Internet Explorer    Firefox    Chrome    Safari    Opera
January    14.3 %                    30.2 %    48.4 %    4.2 %    1.9 %
Source: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
@SkaBobagree, except that the w3school page clearly states that the statistics are collected from W3Schools' log-files, so it's not the world-wide stats (BTW, it may reflect the usage of web-developers than the end users - Web devs use that page a lot).
 Here, maybe: http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-ww-monthly-201202-201302.
 Back to the EU issue, the consumers could care less whether they got IE pre-installed or not. The EU is broke, they got to dig someone.
When announcing the fine, did Joaquin put his pinky to his mouth...and then give an hysterical evil laugh?
Because that's how Dr. Evil would do it.
Just wondering.
anybody can download any browser they want to.....WTF are they talking about? I have been using Google Chrome and Mozilla for years.....