Europe takes on U.S. tech giants and their tax havens

PARIS (AP) - A storm is brewing in Europe over how little Internet powerhouses like Google and Amazon are paying in tax.
Governments, hungry for money to prop up their struggling economies, are accusing the technology giants of incorporating themselves up in low-tax countries so they can avoid paying hundreds of millions of dollars to countries such as Germany, Britain and France - where most of their European income is derived.
In Britain on Monday, a lawmaker pushing to tighten laws said the multinationals' ability to escape corporate taxes "is outrageous and an insult to British businesses and individuals who pay their fair share."
According to court documents, French authorities raided Google's offices in Paris over the summer and seized documents in a tax dispute. More recently, according to a published report, the French government presented Google with a €1.7 billion ($2.18 billion) tax bill; Amazon acknowledged one for $252 million. Facebook is also in the line of fire.
In Italy, the undersecretary of the Economy Ministry revealed during questioning in parliament on Wednesday that the tax police inspected Google's books, adding that it found millions in undeclared income and unpaid sales tax.
The politicians are cracking down on U.S.-based multinational companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon, claiming they pay paying little or no tax in Europe in spite of generating billions in revenue there.
But there is nothing illegal to the multinationals' actions. Thanks to the way the European Union is run, companies operating in Europe can base themselves in any of the 27 member countries, allowing them to take advantage of a particular country's low tax rates.
By setting up overseas headquarters in low-tax jurisdictions such as Ireland or Luxembourg and shifting the profits out of the countries they've done business in, the online companies have managed to keep down both sales taxes and corporate income taxes on their overseas income.
Google's British chief, Matt Brittin, said last week that the company "plays by the rules set by politicians."
"The only people who really have choices are politicians who set the tax rates," he told the U.K's Channel 4 News.
The fact that the methods are legal hasn't stopped resentment brewing among governments, other brick-and-mortar businesses, and households feeling ever higher tax burdens.
The British Parliament's public accounts committee said Amazon, by accounting for the profits made in the U.K. elsewhere in the EU, paid 1.8 million pounds ($2.9 million) in British tax in 2011, on revenue of 207 million pounds. In Italy, the government said tax police determined Google had undeclared earnings of €240 million ($311 million) from 2002-2006 and had not paid value added tax of €96 million in the period.
Philippe Marini, the French senator who leads the country's finance commission, estimated France is missing out on some €1.3 billion in taxes from Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon. And, Marini noted, that amount would pale in comparison to what they likely owe Germany and Britain where sales figures are even higher.
"A bakery across the street is easier to control," Marini said. "And households can't relocate to Ireland just like that."
The companies say they comply with the law and are cooperative in countries where they operate, but do not elaborate. Even people critical of their tactics say ultimately the job of an accountant is to keep a client's tax bill as low as possible. The companies also stress that they do pay some taxes - contributions to their employees' social security, for example.
France, however, is going after the tech companies aggressively: On June 30, tax authorities raided Google's Paris offices, according to court documents posted online after Google contested the seizure of its files. The tech giant has denied receiving a €1.7 billion bill from the French government and says it pays all legally required taxes.
Taxes fall under French privacy law, so specific amounts are not made public. But the raid on Google's Paris offices is a sign the French government believes the tech company has more than just incidental support staff in the French capital. France's budget minister, Jerome Cahuzac, said "a certain search engine needs to regularize its situation in France".
Facebook, Amazon and Apple have come under similar French scrutiny, according to published reports and public filings. Marini said French law is lagging behind, but hopes to catch up. Tech companies differ from, say, a grocery store in that their product is stored on servers and not on a shelf. And unlike a family, the companies can essentially locate - and re-locate - anywhere.
Both Amazon and Google are contesting the French actions, though Cahuzac said he's confident the government will win in court.
Britain and Germany have joined France in aggressively targeting the tech giants and, officials say, are coordinating against what one official calls "stateless income."
The G-20 meeting in Mexico earlier this month showed a measure of international support for tightening the rules. The U.K. Treasury chief George Osborne and German finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble called for a common front "to strengthen international standards for corporate tax regimes."
"Governments have to keep up in the race," said Marini, the French senator. "Companies have a much faster pace than either national or European law."
Helping the governments keep tabs on the tech multinationals is the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Originally set up in 1948 with the aim of stimulating world trade, the OECD now is taking the lead role in fighting tax evasion, said Pascal Saint-Amans, director of the organization's Center for Tax Policy since February.
The OECD has established a locked database detailing some of the world's most sophisticated tax schemes to allow government tax authorities to privately share revenue-shifting schemes they encounter.
The main problem, for Saint-Amans, is that tax havens within Europe such as Ireland and Luxembourg ease the process that allows multinationals to send profits even further offshore to places like Bermuda. That makes it harder for the countries with the most staff and sales to track. Google, Apple, Microsoft and Facebook have international headquarters in Ireland; Amazon's international offices are in Luxembourg. But the biggest European markets for all those companies are Germany, France and Great Britain.
"At some point again you're back to the basics, which is where is the real activity? And that's something that we may have lost sight of," said Saint-Amans. "The low-tax regimes are more the consequence than the problem."
Saint-Amans, who previously worked on ending bank secrecy regulations, believes the problem of taxing "intangibles" can be similarly resolved in a year or two with a concerted effort from all the governments involved, including in the U.S. In the short-term, he said, the coordinated approach of France, Germany and Britain serves as a warning to multinationals trying to avoid taxes, as is the secure OECD database.
Governments, including in the U.S., have long tinkered with effective tax rates in order to attract and keep businesses. But there are signs of change even in the U.S., where all the major tech companies got their start.
"The ability not to pay tax on income that's booked offshore is now the single biggest corporate tax loophole in the code," said Reuven Avi-Yonah, an international tax expert at the University of Michigan who has testified before Congress.
The amounts booked offshore are considerable: For Apple, 61 percent of revenues come from outside the U.S. - and fully a quarter of that from Europe alone. "Apple doesn't have a single store in Ireland," Avi-Yonah said.
In a filing to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Apple said it had set aside $713 million for its 2012 foreign tax bill on overseas pretax earnings of $36.8 billion - a provision of almost 2 percent of what it made.
Google's overseas revenues accounted for 54 percent of its total, including more than 10 percent in Britain alone. Meanwhile Google is tackling government action on another front. German politicians are considering imposing a so-called Google Tax - a levy that would require search engines to pay each time they link to media content like newspaper articles or photographs.
According to a Senate committee memo from September, Microsoft used aggressive asset shifting to avoid $4.5 billion in American taxes from 2009 to 2011.
Avi-Yonah estimated the effective tax rate on overseas income at around 2 or 3 percent for multinational tech companies: Both in the U.S. and abroad, he said, "there's a general sense that these companies pay too little and don't really contribute their fair share."
Governments, hungry for money to prop up their struggling economies, are accusing the technology giants of incorporating themselves up in low-tax countries so they can avoid paying hundreds of millions of dollars to countries such as Germany, Britain and France - where most of their European income is derived.
In Britain on Monday, a lawmaker pushing to tighten laws said the multinationals' ability to escape corporate taxes "is outrageous and an insult to British businesses and individuals who pay their fair share."
According to court documents, French authorities raided Google's offices in Paris over the summer and seized documents in a tax dispute. More recently, according to a published report, the French government presented Google with a €1.7 billion ($2.18 billion) tax bill; Amazon acknowledged one for $252 million. Facebook is also in the line of fire.
In Italy, the undersecretary of the Economy Ministry revealed during questioning in parliament on Wednesday that the tax police inspected Google's books, adding that it found millions in undeclared income and unpaid sales tax.
The politicians are cracking down on U.S.-based multinational companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon, claiming they pay paying little or no tax in Europe in spite of generating billions in revenue there.
But there is nothing illegal to the multinationals' actions. Thanks to the way the European Union is run, companies operating in Europe can base themselves in any of the 27 member countries, allowing them to take advantage of a particular country's low tax rates.
By setting up overseas headquarters in low-tax jurisdictions such as Ireland or Luxembourg and shifting the profits out of the countries they've done business in, the online companies have managed to keep down both sales taxes and corporate income taxes on their overseas income.
Google's British chief, Matt Brittin, said last week that the company "plays by the rules set by politicians."
"The only people who really have choices are politicians who set the tax rates," he told the U.K's Channel 4 News.
The fact that the methods are legal hasn't stopped resentment brewing among governments, other brick-and-mortar businesses, and households feeling ever higher tax burdens.
The British Parliament's public accounts committee said Amazon, by accounting for the profits made in the U.K. elsewhere in the EU, paid 1.8 million pounds ($2.9 million) in British tax in 2011, on revenue of 207 million pounds. In Italy, the government said tax police determined Google had undeclared earnings of €240 million ($311 million) from 2002-2006 and had not paid value added tax of €96 million in the period.
Philippe Marini, the French senator who leads the country's finance commission, estimated France is missing out on some €1.3 billion in taxes from Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon. And, Marini noted, that amount would pale in comparison to what they likely owe Germany and Britain where sales figures are even higher.
"A bakery across the street is easier to control," Marini said. "And households can't relocate to Ireland just like that."
The companies say they comply with the law and are cooperative in countries where they operate, but do not elaborate. Even people critical of their tactics say ultimately the job of an accountant is to keep a client's tax bill as low as possible. The companies also stress that they do pay some taxes - contributions to their employees' social security, for example.
France, however, is going after the tech companies aggressively: On June 30, tax authorities raided Google's Paris offices, according to court documents posted online after Google contested the seizure of its files. The tech giant has denied receiving a €1.7 billion bill from the French government and says it pays all legally required taxes.
Taxes fall under French privacy law, so specific amounts are not made public. But the raid on Google's Paris offices is a sign the French government believes the tech company has more than just incidental support staff in the French capital. France's budget minister, Jerome Cahuzac, said "a certain search engine needs to regularize its situation in France".
Facebook, Amazon and Apple have come under similar French scrutiny, according to published reports and public filings. Marini said French law is lagging behind, but hopes to catch up. Tech companies differ from, say, a grocery store in that their product is stored on servers and not on a shelf. And unlike a family, the companies can essentially locate - and re-locate - anywhere.
Both Amazon and Google are contesting the French actions, though Cahuzac said he's confident the government will win in court.
Britain and Germany have joined France in aggressively targeting the tech giants and, officials say, are coordinating against what one official calls "stateless income."
The G-20 meeting in Mexico earlier this month showed a measure of international support for tightening the rules. The U.K. Treasury chief George Osborne and German finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble called for a common front "to strengthen international standards for corporate tax regimes."
"Governments have to keep up in the race," said Marini, the French senator. "Companies have a much faster pace than either national or European law."
Helping the governments keep tabs on the tech multinationals is the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Originally set up in 1948 with the aim of stimulating world trade, the OECD now is taking the lead role in fighting tax evasion, said Pascal Saint-Amans, director of the organization's Center for Tax Policy since February.
The OECD has established a locked database detailing some of the world's most sophisticated tax schemes to allow government tax authorities to privately share revenue-shifting schemes they encounter.
The main problem, for Saint-Amans, is that tax havens within Europe such as Ireland and Luxembourg ease the process that allows multinationals to send profits even further offshore to places like Bermuda. That makes it harder for the countries with the most staff and sales to track. Google, Apple, Microsoft and Facebook have international headquarters in Ireland; Amazon's international offices are in Luxembourg. But the biggest European markets for all those companies are Germany, France and Great Britain.
"At some point again you're back to the basics, which is where is the real activity? And that's something that we may have lost sight of," said Saint-Amans. "The low-tax regimes are more the consequence than the problem."
Saint-Amans, who previously worked on ending bank secrecy regulations, believes the problem of taxing "intangibles" can be similarly resolved in a year or two with a concerted effort from all the governments involved, including in the U.S. In the short-term, he said, the coordinated approach of France, Germany and Britain serves as a warning to multinationals trying to avoid taxes, as is the secure OECD database.
Governments, including in the U.S., have long tinkered with effective tax rates in order to attract and keep businesses. But there are signs of change even in the U.S., where all the major tech companies got their start.
"The ability not to pay tax on income that's booked offshore is now the single biggest corporate tax loophole in the code," said Reuven Avi-Yonah, an international tax expert at the University of Michigan who has testified before Congress.
The amounts booked offshore are considerable: For Apple, 61 percent of revenues come from outside the U.S. - and fully a quarter of that from Europe alone. "Apple doesn't have a single store in Ireland," Avi-Yonah said.
In a filing to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Apple said it had set aside $713 million for its 2012 foreign tax bill on overseas pretax earnings of $36.8 billion - a provision of almost 2 percent of what it made.
Google's overseas revenues accounted for 54 percent of its total, including more than 10 percent in Britain alone. Meanwhile Google is tackling government action on another front. German politicians are considering imposing a so-called Google Tax - a levy that would require search engines to pay each time they link to media content like newspaper articles or photographs.
According to a Senate committee memo from September, Microsoft used aggressive asset shifting to avoid $4.5 billion in American taxes from 2009 to 2011.
Avi-Yonah estimated the effective tax rate on overseas income at around 2 or 3 percent for multinational tech companies: Both in the U.S. and abroad, he said, "there's a general sense that these companies pay too little and don't really contribute their fair share."
Great. But don't forget to go after Romney, Cheney, the Bush "family" and their "friends" also!
I have been screaming about these multinational businesses hiding billions of income from our country by stashing it in these low tax little havens they have been using for years. Now Europe is after them, but when will out dead ars lawmakers get off their dead fundaments and start finding ways to bring some of that tax money home. My cry is not just because we are in a hurt right now, but your and my tax load would be a hell of a lot less if these mega multinational monsters would cough up some of their hidden tax money.
So.....
What we're whining about is how we write tax laws and create loopholes? Got it.
Then ya wanna go after the gamers instead of fixing the problem? Got it.
Â
Nothing to see here. Move along.
Â
Â
American capitalism is the scummiest thing on earth.Â
It's interesting that these American corporations do not have to pay taxes on any income generated and booked offshore yet my ex wife who is German had to pay US income tax on her earnings which was entirely generated in Germany. Yeah, screw the people and give the greedy outfits tax breaks
Nothing wrong with not wanting to pay higher taxes....
@Windowseat: I agree with you. There is nothing wrong with tax avoidance. It's tax evasion that is the dastardly crime.
Greed
I am pretty sick of the term "fair share". Especially since not one agency or government can actually specify "fair share".
Â
Now, if Governments have created laws that make revenue streams this difficult to determine and calculate, then why is the Corporation's fault for following them to their advantage?
Â
I bet each and every individual works and reworks their own tax returns (those who do their own anyway) until they get the best return OR lowest tax bill for the year.
There is something really goofy in the logic "taxes are too high in that country and their economic system is stupid"....but I'll go harvest $$$ from them while ducking the costs of their stupid economic system....which provides me with $$$. You don't like their tax structure and econ system? Fine - stay out of the country. But going in to harvest $$$ while ducking costs looks an awful lot like an illegal immigrant coming to the US and using our $$$.
"Google, Apple, Microsoft and Facebook". I've purchased products from all but one of these outfits. The other one relies on sponsor money, not mine. My purchase of sponsored products is based on my personal wants/needs, not an ad attached to a website. I hope they all keep paying low taxes. That keeps their costs and our payments low.
"Governments, hungry for money to prop up their struggling economies,"
Â
More like;
Governments, hungry for money to prop up their failing business environment models.
Socialism is expensive isn't it. If they are following the rules set up by the EU then why such a big fuss over tax money that is not owed? maybe I understood it wrong but it seems to me that the laws are poorly written and the companies are using that to there advantage. This is why a lot of companies ship jobs abroad, to find areas where the taxes aren't ridiculous.
 @KittySmasher Companies do not ship jobs oversees for tax purposes. They do so for cheap labor.
 @lakeview  @KittySmasher "By setting up overseas headquarters in low-tax jurisdictions such as Ireland or Luxembourg and shifting the profits out of the countries they've done business in, the online companies have managed to keep down both sales taxes and corporate income taxes on their overseas income."
Â
I guess those HQ's are staffed by androids.
 @NBA_Is_Useless  @Getov  @lakeview  @KittySmasher "Apple made official plans to hire additional employees at its European headquarters. Reuters reported that the current workforce of 2,800 would expand by up to 500 over the next 18 months at the building located in Cork, Ireland. "
http://9to5mac.com/2012/04/20/apple-to-hire-500-employees-at-european-hq-in-cork-ireland/
Â
Androids, no doubt...
@Getov Mylon @lakeview @KittySmasher Just because you incorporate in that location does not mean you employ anyone other than a single agent to represent your company in that area for legal matters.
 @KittySmasher What? Poorly worded and thought-out legislation could lead to unintended consequences? ZOUNDS! Good thing we don't have anything like that here in Dear Leader World.
The foreign countries will end up getting the tax revenue that these massive corporations should be paying to the U.S. Treasury before the U.S. government changes the rules to make them pay taxes here.Â
Â
Pathetic.Â
Â
Can't wait for the next GOP led campaign for another repatriation tax holiday...
gosh... I find it hard to fathom that multi-billion dollar Corporation heads would try to screw the rest of us... that can't be... can it??
Right...as if you wouldn't try to legally protect your own money. Either way you've gotta love the socialists constantly coming after corporations, thinking they're going to pay. They'll pay alright---through increased prices on their products to make up the loss. Then who pays? That's right Truthinadverts, YOU do.
 @jimbob Jimbob... say "socialist" more often... it didn't quite take the first time.
 @jimbob So my iPhone that costs 22 dollars to make by Foxconn in China from slave labor will increase in price from 800$ to 825$?Â
Â
The horrors! And don't forget: SOCIALISM!!! SCARY!
 @TruthinAdverts That (for the most part) multi-nationals act in the interest of their shareholders is just so hard to fathom. Sorry, I don't feel the need for us to pay for the retirement of 50 year old Greek pensioners. TFB.
Â
Remember, you ARE the owner of these publicly traded US multi-nationals.
 @Getov Mylon When U.S. companies do business in foreign countries, they are subject to their laws. If those laws make doing business unprofitable, then our companies won't be in those markets.Â