Microsoft renews plea for crackdown on Google

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Microsoft began the new year harping on a favorite theme: The software maker is arguing that government regulators need to crack down on Google to preserve fair competition in the Internet and smartphone markets.
The latest refrain came Wednesday in a blog post by Dave Heiner, Microsoft's deputy general counsel. His attack amounted to a last-ditch appeal to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the European Commission as they wrap up wide-ranging investigations into Google's business practices. Resolutions to those probes are expected early this year, perhaps within the next week at the FTC.
Microsoft fears Google, perhaps its biggest nemesis, will emerge from the antitrust probes without being required to make significant changes.
"Hopefully, Google will wake up to a New Year with a resolution to change its ways and start to conform with the antitrust laws," Heiner wrote. "If not, then 2013 hopefully will be the year when antitrust enforcers display the resolve that Google continues to lack."
For the past two years, Microsoft has been among the companies marshaling a campaign aimed at persuading regulators to force Google to changes its ways. Among other things, regulators have been looking into allegations that Google has been highlighting its own services in its influential search results while burying links to competing sites. The investigations also have delved into the way prices are set in Google's digital advertising system, the Internet's biggest marketing vehicle, and examined whether Google has been refusing to license key patents to mobile devices vying against gadgets powered by Google's free Android software.
Heiner mostly rehashed complaints that cast Google as a conniving company that abuses its dominance of Internet search, as well as its leadership in online video and smartphones, to thwart its rivals to the detriment of consumers.
Google Inc. has steadfastly maintained that it hasn't done anything wrong while trying to give people better access to the information and other services they want.
In an attempt to make his case, Heiner focused on previously aired allegations that Google has cut off Microsoft Corp. from the data it needs to improve the YouTube viewing experience of Windows smartphones users.
YouTube, which is owned by Google, hasn't designed a Windows Phone application for its popular video service. Microsoft views the snub as a calculated attempt to lessen the appeal of Windows Phones as they try to challenge Apple Inc.'s pioneering iPhone and the wide array of smartphones relying on Android. The YouTube apps designed for the iPhone and Android phones have become staples on those devices.
As a counter-measure, Microsoft has been trying to build its own YouTube app for Windows Phones for the past two years, only to be blocked by Google's refusal to license vital coding information, according to Heiner. YouTube's own leadership wants to cooperate with Microsoft, Heiner wrote, but those executives were overruled last month by their bosses at Google.
"Google's refusal deprives consumers who use competing platforms of a comparable experience in accessing content that is generally available on the Web, almost all of which is created by users rather than by Google itself," Heiner lamented.
In a statement, Google denied Microsoft's claims and stressed that all of YouTube's features are available through mobile Web browsers. "We've worked with Microsoft for several years to help build a great YouTube experience on Windows phones," Google maintained.
Limiting YouTube access to mobile browsers apparently wasn't good enough for Google on the iPhone. Even before Apple dropped YouTube as one of its built-in applications when it released a new iPhone operating system in September, Google had released an alternative to fill the void. The new iPhone app ensured users wouldn't have to visit YouTube through a browser.
Google also offers a YouTube app for Microsoft's Xbox 360 video-game console, which comes with an Internet connection that makes it easier to watch online video on television sets instead of the much smaller screens on computers and smartphones.
Microsoft Corp. wrangled with antitrust regulators for much of the 1990s in legal battles that focused on whether it was using its pervasive Windows operating system to squelch other software alternatives. The company ultimately had to make several concessions while keeping most of its business intact, but the regulatory fight proved to be a major distraction that diverted management's attention just as Internet search was helping to turn the Web into a hotbed of data, entertainment and technology. Google helped to orchestrate that shift over the past 14 years, providing it with the means to branch into smartphones and other fields while Microsoft's growth has slowed amid the upheaval.
The latest refrain came Wednesday in a blog post by Dave Heiner, Microsoft's deputy general counsel. His attack amounted to a last-ditch appeal to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the European Commission as they wrap up wide-ranging investigations into Google's business practices. Resolutions to those probes are expected early this year, perhaps within the next week at the FTC.
Microsoft fears Google, perhaps its biggest nemesis, will emerge from the antitrust probes without being required to make significant changes.
"Hopefully, Google will wake up to a New Year with a resolution to change its ways and start to conform with the antitrust laws," Heiner wrote. "If not, then 2013 hopefully will be the year when antitrust enforcers display the resolve that Google continues to lack."
For the past two years, Microsoft has been among the companies marshaling a campaign aimed at persuading regulators to force Google to changes its ways. Among other things, regulators have been looking into allegations that Google has been highlighting its own services in its influential search results while burying links to competing sites. The investigations also have delved into the way prices are set in Google's digital advertising system, the Internet's biggest marketing vehicle, and examined whether Google has been refusing to license key patents to mobile devices vying against gadgets powered by Google's free Android software.
Heiner mostly rehashed complaints that cast Google as a conniving company that abuses its dominance of Internet search, as well as its leadership in online video and smartphones, to thwart its rivals to the detriment of consumers.
Google Inc. has steadfastly maintained that it hasn't done anything wrong while trying to give people better access to the information and other services they want.
In an attempt to make his case, Heiner focused on previously aired allegations that Google has cut off Microsoft Corp. from the data it needs to improve the YouTube viewing experience of Windows smartphones users.
YouTube, which is owned by Google, hasn't designed a Windows Phone application for its popular video service. Microsoft views the snub as a calculated attempt to lessen the appeal of Windows Phones as they try to challenge Apple Inc.'s pioneering iPhone and the wide array of smartphones relying on Android. The YouTube apps designed for the iPhone and Android phones have become staples on those devices.
As a counter-measure, Microsoft has been trying to build its own YouTube app for Windows Phones for the past two years, only to be blocked by Google's refusal to license vital coding information, according to Heiner. YouTube's own leadership wants to cooperate with Microsoft, Heiner wrote, but those executives were overruled last month by their bosses at Google.
"Google's refusal deprives consumers who use competing platforms of a comparable experience in accessing content that is generally available on the Web, almost all of which is created by users rather than by Google itself," Heiner lamented.
In a statement, Google denied Microsoft's claims and stressed that all of YouTube's features are available through mobile Web browsers. "We've worked with Microsoft for several years to help build a great YouTube experience on Windows phones," Google maintained.
Limiting YouTube access to mobile browsers apparently wasn't good enough for Google on the iPhone. Even before Apple dropped YouTube as one of its built-in applications when it released a new iPhone operating system in September, Google had released an alternative to fill the void. The new iPhone app ensured users wouldn't have to visit YouTube through a browser.
Google also offers a YouTube app for Microsoft's Xbox 360 video-game console, which comes with an Internet connection that makes it easier to watch online video on television sets instead of the much smaller screens on computers and smartphones.
Microsoft Corp. wrangled with antitrust regulators for much of the 1990s in legal battles that focused on whether it was using its pervasive Windows operating system to squelch other software alternatives. The company ultimately had to make several concessions while keeping most of its business intact, but the regulatory fight proved to be a major distraction that diverted management's attention just as Internet search was helping to turn the Web into a hotbed of data, entertainment and technology. Google helped to orchestrate that shift over the past 14 years, providing it with the means to branch into smartphones and other fields while Microsoft's growth has slowed amid the upheaval.
Talk about pot kettle.
Oh how IRONIC this story is! Â I just had to chuckle. Â I've been reading stories for YEARS about Microsoft being unfair, now this.
Â
Does Microsoft need a little cheese to go with their WhINE?
I CHOOSE Google because Bing sucks. Google pays me for having a website/ video content and hosting ads there. Quiet down Microsoft, we don't need more government regulation.
So when you search for something on google, say directions to a store. Google should feed up yahoo maps first? uh, no.What Microsoft doesn't like about Google is that Google has put out a product that works well, and is licensed for free (android). Google makes its money off advertisement, not the production and sale of the software like Microsoft.Sueing google because they didn't spend the time and money to make a youtube app for the windows mobile platform (yet unproven) is stupid. They made an app for the Iphone because it is a proven platform. Millions of people use it, therefor millions of people could potentially have access to google's products, and thus google can make money off their advertisements.Instead of one corporation trying to beat down the other with lawsuits, they should try and create a product that competes well against the other company's product.Â
 @Jalharad I love the free market!  The best will always win in the end.
 @K. Coleman The best will not always win in the end...the cheapest will win.
 @cyclops  @K. Coleman Um, have you heard of Apple Inc?
 @Jalharad No,  Google will just put all software companies out of business because no one can compete with free.  It completely destroys innovation.  Will you be happy in the future when all the software we use comes from Google?
 @cyclops  @Jalharad I heard this argument about Microsoft in the 90's and early 00's...  Now look at the landscape.  Totally different.
 @K. Coleman   No...Microsoft charged money for their software..Google gives it away for free.  Would you compete in business with a competitor who gives away their product for free?  You won't be in business long. Â
LOL! Â How about making a mobile operating system that people actually want instead of copying almost verbatim the Apple model (i.e. prices for tablets, charging 30% to developers for sales, etc.)? Â It's a good way to make yourself irrelevant. Â Google basically made Android the new Windows Mobile OS.
Â
Microsoft, and Bill Gates, used shady tactics for years until they couldn't strong arm anyone with their racket. Â Not that I hate Windows or anything but its "funny" when a company flails with the "if you can't join 'em, sue em" strategy.
Â
All companies copy each other, as they should, but you don't really ever see too much innovation at Microsoft even though they have the money and talent to do so. Â It's kinda sad.
 @KennyGambler Google takes 30% of the developers sales also.  MS is right with this one.  They haven't done anything near to what Google has done when it comes to anti competitive business practices.
 @cyclops Then why not charge less until their app market grows bigger?
Â
What exactly has Google done to MSFT as anti-competitive? Â Are you talking about giving the OS away for free to OEMs? Â MSFT can do the same thing, if they so desire, and do an ad-based business model like Google. Â Besides, MSFT drove out Netscape by giving away Internet Explorer in the late 90s.
Â
How about developing good software and services? Â All I see from MSFT is lack of creativity perhaps due to internal politics/bureaucracy.
 @KennyGambler No offense taken but I don't work for MS and I have written commercially available software independently so I know a few things. I agree...MS bundling IE and calling it necessary was absolute BS, but they did recoup some of the expense because they actually charged for the OS.  Ok...so they kind of gave away 1 piece of software.  If every company had to give away their software to compete with Google there would be no more software companies.  The ultimate anti competitive business.  Disclaimer....I actually make money with Android but I still hate Google with a passion.  I do not want to be forced to see ads on every single thing I do online.
 @cyclops No offense, but you're either a MSFT employee or someone that doesn't have much knowledge of recent technology history.
Â
MSFT integrated Internet Explorer into the Windows operating system. Â If you understand OS design, then you would understand that integrating a Web browser into the file system interface is not necessary. Â If your beliefs as consistent, then you would see that this is anti-competitive.
Â
This is different than not writing a YouTube app for Windows Phone, it's a free market.
 @KennyGambler That is one thing MS never seems to understand...they have to be cheaper to gain market share  from the current players.  They just don't get it.  What has Google done anti-competitive?  Spending millions and millions and millions of dollars developing software and then giving it away for free....that hurts everyone.  MS included IE in their OS which means they charged money for it. Â
Google's view on privacy and protection of personal information makes the Chinese government look progressive.
 @Howard Beale Ouch! <GRIN>
Wait a minute, the company that has single-handedly put multiple companies out of business due to their own abuses is now crying foul??? Microsoft, meet Karma.
 @I am in Tacoma Microsoft should be sued for posting signs all over their property touting how people who work for them are legal to do so. What they really do is sub-contract work out so that in case of an audit the contractor who hires illegals to complete the job will ultimately take the blame. Microsoft is surely not operating at the highest standard or in total transparency.Â
@SoTweetie In what capacities would one find illegals working at Microsoft?
For once I agree with Microsoft. Â Google should be fined and dismantled for their anti competitive business practices.