Story Published:
Jun 26, 2009 at 8:15 AM PST
Story Updated:
Jun 26, 2009 at 5:51 PM PST
SEATTLE -- Rallying to the defense of the sculpture of a nude woman on display next door to the new Burien library brought a flurry of e-mails that, in part,
called into question my artistic sensibilities.Brad Dawkins writes: "So you think 'remarkable beauty' consists of showing what an older woman looks like without any clothes on? Families with children will be walking past what you call art...I call it a slap in the public's face."
Caroline Wasser: "There is no purpose of showing a squatting, naked woman in a field...Just because someone calls it art doesn't mean it is right."
Walter Trillin: "I continue to watch as our society becomes more and more debased...If this is what you call art, it belongs in a museum, not outside a library where kids can gawk at it."
Tom Henshaw: "No way should that naked woman be allowed to stay there...It looks like she's relieving herself."
And finally, there was the voice mail I got from Abby Duncan.
At first I was crushed because I thought she said I was not cool.
On listening to the message again, what she actually said was that I am not couth.
That I can handle.
Thanks for writing everyone.
Have a great weekend.
Have something to say to Ken? Login or signup below to post a comment. Just be sure to read the rules and keep things civil. Or, you can e-mail him at kenschram@komo4news.com