Answering some questions on the Russian meteor strike

I guess it's fitting a meteorology blog would finally get to use the whole "meteor" part of it...
A meteor exploded in the sky above Russia's Ural Mountains on Friday, causing a shockwave that blew out countless windows and injured hundreds of people with flying glass and created quite a few questions since human sightings of meteor explosions are quite rare.
Q: How big was the meteor?
According to NASA, it was about 15 meters across, or about 50 feet. That's roughly 1/4 the size of the asteroid 2012 DA14 that is making a close pass Friday. Or, on more Earthly terms, it's almost the size of 3 Buicks -- 2.76 1999 Buick LeSabres to be exact (or 2 1/2 Ford Excursions). The meteor was estimated to weigh about 7,000 tons. (Note: Original reports only gave it a 10-ton weight)
Q: How fast was it going?
Again according to NASA, the meteor was going about 33,000 mph when it exploded at somewhere around 100,000-150,000 feet above the ground. At that altitude, the speed of sound is about 660 mph so it was going about Mach 50. (Note, speed of sound is variable based on temperature and is about 761 mph at sea level.)
To compare, the Space Shuttle was usually going about 3,000 mph on blast off when it's at about 28 miles high. The SR-71 would go about Mach 3.2, while some X-aircraft, using rocket power, have reportedly approached Mach 10.
Q: Why was there such an explosive sound?
In addition to the light show, there was a deafening explosion sound that wiped out about 1 million square feet of glass across the town of Chelyabinsk
What everyone heard was an incredibly intense sonic boom.
Sonic booms are created when objects reach the speed of sound -- at that precise moment, sound waves that normally would be racing out ahead of an object get sandwiched on top of each other (for lack of better term) and intensify, much like if you were to take the three ocean waves and combine their energy into one.
But if you think a sonic boom from a jet plane breaking the sound barrier was loud (many of you might remember the Sonic booms when fighter jets scrambled to intercept a plane that encroached on restricted air space over Seattle during a President Obama visit in 2010) try taking something of much larger mass and much less aerodynamics and shove that through the sound barrier at super-super-sonic speeds.
You can find more information on what causes sonic booms at this relatively laymen term example, or for more of the physics geeks, a more technical explanation.
Or, maybe it was just simple marketing?
@scottskomo I really think people trying to bring the Sonics back to Seattle might have gone a little far with this sonic boom advertising:)
— Pam Stucky (@pamstucky) February 15, 2013
Here are some other questions and answers, courtesy of Associated Press writer Frank Jordans:
___
Q. What's the difference between a meteor and a meteorite?
A. Meteors are pieces of space rock, usually from larger comets or asteroids, which enter the Earth's atmosphere. Many are burned up by friction and the heat of the atmosphere, but those that survive and strike the Earth are called meteorites. They often hit the ground at tremendous speed - up to 30,000 kilometers an hour (18,650 mph) - releasing a huge amount of energy, according to the European Space Agency.
Q: How common are meteorite strikes?
A: Experts say smaller strikes happen five to 10 times a year. Large meteors such as the one Friday in Russia are rarer, but still occur about every five years, according to Addi Bischoff, a mineralogist at the University of Muenster in Germany. Most of them fall over uninhabited areas where they don't injure humans.
Q: How big was Friday's bang in Russia, and why did it cause so many injuries?
A: Alan Harris, a senior scientist at the German Aerospace Center in Berlin, said most of the damage would have been caused by the blast - or blasts - as the meteor broke up in the atmosphere. The rapid deceleration of the meteor released a huge amount of energy that would have been heard and felt many miles away. Witnesses say it shattered windows and sent loose objects flying through the air.
While estimates of the mass of the meteor range from 10-100 tons, and it is still unclear if it was made of rock or iron, "the explosive force of the airburst might have been some 10 kilotons of TNT," said Harris. But he noted that since the blast occurred several miles above the Earth, the damage isn't comparable to an explosion of that magnitude on the Earth' surface.
By comparison, the U.S. bomb dropped over Hiroshima during World War II had an explosive force of about 15 kilotons, but it detonated just 2,000 feet above a densely populated city.
Q: Is there any link between this meteor and the asteroid fly-by taking place later Friday?
A: No, it's just cosmic coincidence. According to NASA, the trajectory of the Russian meteorite was significantly different than that of asteroid 2012 DA14. "In videos of the meteor, it is seen to pass from left to right in front of the rising sun, which means it was traveling from north to south. Asteroid DA14's trajectory is in the opposite direction, from south to north," the U.S. space agency said.
Q: When was the last comparable meteorite strike?
A: In 2008, astronomers spotted a meteor similar to the one in Russia heading toward Earth about 20 hours before it entered the atmosphere. It exploded over the vast African nation of Sudan, causing no known injuries.
The largest known meteor in recent times caused the "Tunguska event" - flattening thousands of square miles of forest in remote Siberia in 1908. Nobody was injured by the meteor blast, or by the Sikhote-Alin meteorite that fell in eastern Siberia in 1947.
Scientists believe that a far larger meteorite strike on what today is Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula may have been responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs about 66 million years ago. According to that theory, the impact would have thrown up vast amounts of dust that blanketed the sky for decades and altered the climate on Earth.
Q: What can scientists learn from Friday's strike?
A: Bischoff says scientists and treasure hunters are probably already racing to find pieces of the meteorite. Some meteorites can be very valuable, selling for up to $670 per gram, depending on their origin and composition. Because meteors have remained largely unchanged for billions of years - unlike rocks on Earth that have been affected by erosion and volcanic outbreaks - scientists will study the fragments to learn more about the early universe.
Harris, of the German Aerospace Center, says some meteorites are also believed to carry organic material and may have influenced the development of life on Earth.
Q: What would happen if a meteorite hit a city?
A: A blast at low altitude or on the surface would result in many casualties and cause serious damage to buildings. The exact extent would depend on many factors, including the mass of the meteorite, its speed and composition, said Harris.
Scientists have been discussing for several years how to prepare for such an event - however remote. European Space Agency spokesman Bernhard von Weyhe says experts from Europe, the U.S. and Russia are working on way to spot potential threats sooner and avert them. But don't expect a Hollywood-style mission to fly a nuclear bomb into space and blow up the asteroid, like the movie "Armageddon."
"It's a global challenge and we need to find a solution together," he said. "But one thing's for sure, the Bruce Willis 'Armageddon' method won't work."
Anyone know if this was spotted in space in advance? Or was it a complete surprise. This kinda stuff scares the hell out of me!
@Scoondog This one was a surprise. So far, NASA has managed to track only about 1% of the near-Earth asteroids the size of 2012 DA14, the fly-by they did expect yesterday. At about 45 meters, its diameter was three times the diameter of the one that hit.
They're working on it, but meanwhile, yesterday's event provides a convincing argument against the philosophy behind William Ernest Henley's poem Invictus. We're not the masters of our fate.http://www.livescience.com/27188-russian-meteor-explosion-faq.html
@relatively @Scoondog Oh so it was too small to be detected? It's amazing how much they are able to see out there in space... where' s Carl Sagan when you need him?
I don't think it was a meteor. The contrail wasn't consistent with the ionization trail left behind by a meteor. In addition the contrail was below the level of clouds which is to low for an ionization trail. If one looks at the contrail one could see a mixture of different colors. While an ionization trail is made up of particles from the meteor - and that could effect the light reflection appearing to be different colors - I don't think that is likely in this case.Â
My personal opinion is it was likely space junk - probably a defunct satellite. There are thousands of them up there and the trajectory and speed would match. Additionally, the left over fuel, chemicals and other man made materials would explain the large contrail seen.Â
@seattleemtUm, not sure what you are on about, but it was most DEFINITELY a meteor, no ifs, ands or buts, confirmed by scientists the world over. And your "space junk" hypothesis is just hilarious. Did you graduate high school?
@seattleemtI am not so sure I agree with your assertion that it was not a meteor (but I'm no scientist!)
First, the estimated speed, as stated in this story is well over the speed of any orbiting satellite, at least from what I've read. How would the "space junk" gain that sort of velocity from a natural loss of orbit?Â
Secondly, the story states the explosion occurred between 100,000 to 150,000 feet - isn't that above the level of most clouds? There clearly was a trail before the explosion.Â
Third, if the reentering object was large enough to cause an explosion upon reentry, I believe there would have been warning given to the public, as has been done in the past, that falling debris may pose a risk. Larger satellites that lose their orbits are tracked, and their reentries are known and projected ahead of time.
Since we see all the other ones floating around space and we have been keeping track of one 4 times larger. Im curious why we didnt see this one coming or if it was even big enough to see coming?
The one thing I have not heard anything about is WHY it exploded.Â
@lakeview NO, it is EASY to say with absolute certainty! The heat of entry into our atmosphere of a combined speed of some 33,000 mph produces alot of kinetic energy - the rapid heating destabilizes the structure of a stone or stoney-iron meteoroid of this size so when it becomes a meteor, it explodes. Basic physics, people. No guesses whatsoever.
@lakeview Its kinda hard for anyone to say with absolute certainty. Most likely it is due to it heating up while entering our atmosphere along with the friction that would occur when it hits out atmosphere as well.  Ice embedded in it call also heat up very quickly expanding and break up the object with extreme force.  There is also the chance that there were flammable or explosive materials that reacted with the heat and/or oxygen on our planet allowing it to explode/burn.
@APenny4MyThoughtsI always thought it was air friction, too, but it looks like the current consensus is that the heat mostly comes from "atmospheric ram pressure." When something is traveling that fast relative to Earth's atmosphere, the air in front heats up as it gets compressed. Also, apparently just the extreme pressure can cause a meteor to break up explosively.
http://www.space.com/3113-meteors-meteor-showers-science.html
"2.76 1999 Buick LeSabres to be exact..."
:)
@ScottSKOMO (in this reference frame)
@ScottSKOMO Apollo 10 return was 24,790 mph, so this thing came in at almost 8,000 mph faster than any human has ever gone.
@ScottSKOMO Wow. The 15 meter figure from NASA is a lot bigger than other sources I saw.